diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2017-04-20 21:16:19 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2017-04-20 21:17:17 +0200 |
commit | 14c948987f0b5128af4dcf9864cf5fa62977c401 (patch) | |
tree | 4e5e872cff7af9949102f0abb30c3be5ff9d9374 /src/test | |
parent | 987a6c09562e1e1e9d6623b999ae9de268490e4b (diff) | |
parent | 68af6514987d9d7bfcd67caa9394edda6ab5ef2c (diff) |
Merge #9942: Refactor CBlockPolicyEstimator
68af651 MOVEONLY: move TxConfirmStats to cpp (Alex Morcos)
2332f19 Initialize TxConfirmStats in constructor (Alex Morcos)
5ba81e5 Read and Write fee estimate file directly from CBlockPolicyEstimator (Alex Morcos)
14e10aa Call estimate(Smart)Fee directly from CBlockPolicyEstimator (Alex Morcos)
dbb9e36 Give CBlockPolicyEstimator it's own lock (Alex Morcos)
f6187d6 Make processBlockTx private. (Alex Morcos)
ae7327b Make feeEstimator its own global instance of CBlockPolicyEstimator (Alex Morcos)
Tree-SHA512: dbf3bd2b30822e609a35f3da519b62d23f8a50e564750695ddebd08553b4c01874ae3e07d792c6cc78cc377d2db33b951ffedc46ac7edaf5793f9ebb931713af
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp | 45 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp index bc2f49ef3f..ed6782ea34 100644 --- a/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/policyestimator_tests.cpp @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(policyestimator_tests, BasicTestingSetup) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) { - CTxMemPool mpool; + CBlockPolicyEstimator feeEst; + CTxMemPool mpool(&feeEst); TestMemPoolEntryHelper entry; CAmount basefee(2000); CAmount deltaFee(100); @@ -78,16 +79,16 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) // At this point we should need to combine 5 buckets to get enough data points // So estimateFee(1,2,3) should fail and estimateFee(4) should return somewhere around // 8*baserate. estimateFee(4) %'s are 100,100,100,100,90 = average 98% - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(2) == CFeeRate(0)); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(3) == CFeeRate(0)); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() < 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() > 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(2) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(3) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() < 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() + deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(4).GetFeePerK() > 8*baseRate.GetFeePerK() - deltaFee); int answerFound; - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(1, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(3, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(4, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(8, &answerFound) == mpool.estimateFee(8) && answerFound == 8); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(1, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(3, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(4, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(4) && answerFound == 4); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(8, &answerFound, mpool) == feeEst.estimateFee(8) && answerFound == 8); } } @@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) // Second highest feerate has 100% chance of being included by 2 blocks, // so estimateFee(2) should return 9*baseRate etc... for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) { - origFeeEst.push_back(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); + origFeeEst.push_back(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); if (i > 2) { // Fee estimates should be monotonically decreasing BOOST_CHECK(origFeeEst[i-1] <= origFeeEst[i-2]); } @@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) while (blocknum < 250) mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); for (int i = 2; i < 10;i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] + deltaFee); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] + deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); } @@ -141,8 +142,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) int answerFound; for (int i = 1; i < 10;i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i) == CFeeRate(0) || mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i, &answerFound).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[answerFound-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i) == CFeeRate(0) || feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, &answerFound, mpool).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[answerFound-1] - deltaFee); } // Mine all those transactions @@ -157,9 +158,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) } mpool.removeForBlock(block, 265); block.clear(); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); for (int i = 2; i < 10;i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() > origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); } // Mine 200 more blocks where everything is mined every block @@ -179,9 +180,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) mpool.removeForBlock(block, ++blocknum); block.clear(); } - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(1) == CFeeRate(0)); for (int i = 2; i < 10; i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK() < origFeeEst[i-1] - deltaFee); } // Test that if the mempool is limited, estimateSmartFee won't return a value below the mempool min fee @@ -190,8 +191,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(BlockPolicyEstimates) mpool.TrimToSize(1); BOOST_CHECK(mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK() > feeV[5]); for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) { - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); - BOOST_CHECK(mpool.estimateSmartFee(i).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK()); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, NULL, mpool).GetFeePerK() >= feeEst.estimateFee(i).GetFeePerK()); + BOOST_CHECK(feeEst.estimateSmartFee(i, NULL, mpool).GetFeePerK() >= mpool.GetMinFee(1).GetFeePerK()); } } |