diff options
| author | Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> | 2018-02-19 18:29:22 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> | 2018-02-19 18:38:47 -0800 |
| commit | ffc6e48b2983189dc0ce7de0a038e5329bc07b1b (patch) | |
| tree | 4dd12a11b09f9e5d734f4c9d78992bcb19da4cde /src/test | |
| parent | dcfe218626b05204e9fbc95ba5d95ca0eb72ec9b (diff) | |
| parent | d60234885bcc07b1a7f85ded7731549ec2fcfefa (diff) | |
| download | bitcoin-ffc6e48b2983189dc0ce7de0a038e5329bc07b1b.tar.xz | |
Merge #10579: [RPC] Split signrawtransaction into wallet and non-wallet RPC command
d60234885b Add test for signrawtransaction (Andrew Chow)
eefff65a4b scripted-diff: change signrawtransaction to signrawtransactionwithwallet in tests (Andrew Chow)
1e79c055cd Split signrawtransaction into wallet and non-wallet (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of #10570. It also builds on top of #10571.
This PR splits `signrawtransaction` into two commands, `signrawtransactionwithkey` and `signrawtransactionwithwallet`. `signrawtransactionwithkey` requires private keys to be passed in and does not use the wallet for any signing. `signrawtransactionwithwallet` uses the wallet to sign a raw transaction and does not have any parameters to take private keys.
The `signrawtransaction` RPC has been marked as deprecated and will call the appropriate RPC command based upon the parameters given. A test was added to check this behavior is still consistent with the original behavior.
All tests that used `signrawtransaction` have been updated to use one of the two new RPCs. Most uses were changed to `signrawtransactionwithwallet`. These were changed via a scripted diff.
Tree-SHA512: d0adf5b4cd7077639c504ec07bee262a3b94658d34db0a5c86a263b6393f7aa62f45129eafe29a7c861aa58440dd19348ee0c8b685e8a62d6f4adae8ec8f8cb3
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/test/rpc_tests.cpp | 12 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/rpc_tests.cpp b/src/test/rpc_tests.cpp index ed86413b2f..108c1a063e 100644 --- a/src/test/rpc_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/rpc_tests.cpp @@ -69,14 +69,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(rpc_rawparams) BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW(r = CallRPC(std::string("decoderawtransaction ")+rawtx+" false")); BOOST_CHECK_THROW(r = CallRPC(std::string("decoderawtransaction ")+rawtx+" false extra"), std::runtime_error); - BOOST_CHECK_THROW(CallRPC("signrawtransaction"), std::runtime_error); - BOOST_CHECK_THROW(CallRPC("signrawtransaction null"), std::runtime_error); - BOOST_CHECK_THROW(CallRPC("signrawtransaction ff00"), std::runtime_error); - BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW(CallRPC(std::string("signrawtransaction ")+rawtx)); - BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW(CallRPC(std::string("signrawtransaction ")+rawtx+" null null NONE|ANYONECANPAY")); - BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW(CallRPC(std::string("signrawtransaction ")+rawtx+" [] [] NONE|ANYONECANPAY")); - BOOST_CHECK_THROW(CallRPC(std::string("signrawtransaction ")+rawtx+" null null badenum"), std::runtime_error); - // Only check failure cases for sendrawtransaction, there's no network to send to... BOOST_CHECK_THROW(CallRPC("sendrawtransaction"), std::runtime_error); BOOST_CHECK_THROW(CallRPC("sendrawtransaction null"), std::runtime_error); @@ -119,9 +111,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(rpc_rawsign) std::string notsigned = r.get_str(); std::string privkey1 = "\"KzsXybp9jX64P5ekX1KUxRQ79Jht9uzW7LorgwE65i5rWACL6LQe\""; std::string privkey2 = "\"Kyhdf5LuKTRx4ge69ybABsiUAWjVRK4XGxAKk2FQLp2HjGMy87Z4\""; - r = CallRPC(std::string("signrawtransaction ")+notsigned+" "+prevout+" "+"[]"); + r = CallRPC(std::string("signrawtransactionwithkey ")+notsigned+" [] "+prevout); BOOST_CHECK(find_value(r.get_obj(), "complete").get_bool() == false); - r = CallRPC(std::string("signrawtransaction ")+notsigned+" "+prevout+" "+"["+privkey1+","+privkey2+"]"); + r = CallRPC(std::string("signrawtransactionwithkey ")+notsigned+" ["+privkey1+","+privkey2+"] "+prevout); BOOST_CHECK(find_value(r.get_obj(), "complete").get_bool() == true); } |