diff options
author | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2017-11-07 17:03:00 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2017-11-07 17:05:46 -0500 |
commit | dd561667cb7ccbbfed3134b05a565971ef6f5873 (patch) | |
tree | 2fece731c25e136f3de44b4f2f33cb02c2bf222d /src/test | |
parent | 6f01dcf63873a5e42798635ab4026c9a5f9fa213 (diff) | |
parent | d618458184742b15a7ab0349127ede7a2946a182 (diff) |
Merge #11389: Support having SegWit always active in regtest (sipa, ajtowns, jnewbery)
d61845818 Have SegWit active by default (Pieter Wuille)
4bd89210a Unit tests for always-active versionbits. (Anthony Towns)
d07ee77ab Always-active versionbits support (Pieter Wuille)
18e071841 [consensus] Pin P2SH activation to block 173805 on mainnet (John Newbery)
526023aa7 Improve handling of BIP9Deployment limits (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Most tests shouldn't have to deal with the now-historical SegWit activation transition (and other deployments, but SegWit is certainly the hardest one to accomodate).
This PR makes a versionbits starttime of -1 equal to "always active", and enables it by default for SegWit on regtest. Individual tests can override this by using the existing `-vbparams` option.
A few unit tests and functional tests are adapted to indeed override vbparams, as they specifically test the transition.
This is in preparation for wallet SegWit support, but I thought having earlier eyes on it would be useful.
Tree-SHA512: 3f07a7b41cf46476e6c7a5c43244e68c9f41d223482cedaa4c02a3a7b7cd0e90cbd06b84a1f3704620559636a2268f5767d4c52d09c1b354945737046f618fe5
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/miner_tests.cpp | 35 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp | 15 |
3 files changed, 36 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp index 41e0626eb9..2851808cf4 100644 --- a/src/test/miner_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/miner_tests.cpp @@ -335,23 +335,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity) BOOST_CHECK_THROW(AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey), std::runtime_error); mempool.clear(); - // invalid (pre-p2sh) txn in mempool, template creation fails - tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash(); - tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0; - tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1; - tx.vout[0].nValue = BLOCKSUBSIDY-LOWFEE; - script = CScript() << OP_0; - tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(CScriptID(script)); - hash = tx.GetHash(); - mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx)); - tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hash; - tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << std::vector<unsigned char>(script.begin(), script.end()); - tx.vout[0].nValue -= LOWFEE; - hash = tx.GetHash(); - mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(false).FromTx(tx)); - BOOST_CHECK_THROW(AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey), std::runtime_error); - mempool.clear(); - // double spend txn pair in mempool, template creation fails tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash(); tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1; @@ -391,6 +374,24 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(CreateNewBlock_validity) chainActive.SetTip(next); } BOOST_CHECK(pblocktemplate = AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey)); + + // invalid p2sh txn in mempool, template creation fails + tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txFirst[0]->GetHash(); + tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0; + tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << OP_1; + tx.vout[0].nValue = BLOCKSUBSIDY-LOWFEE; + script = CScript() << OP_0; + tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(CScriptID(script)); + hash = tx.GetHash(); + mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(true).FromTx(tx)); + tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = hash; + tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << std::vector<unsigned char>(script.begin(), script.end()); + tx.vout[0].nValue -= LOWFEE; + hash = tx.GetHash(); + mempool.addUnchecked(hash, entry.Fee(LOWFEE).Time(GetTime()).SpendsCoinbase(false).FromTx(tx)); + BOOST_CHECK_THROW(AssemblerForTest(chainparams).CreateNewBlock(scriptPubKey), std::runtime_error); + mempool.clear(); + // Delete the dummy blocks again. while (chainActive.Tip()->nHeight > nHeight) { CBlockIndex* del = chainActive.Tip(); diff --git a/src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp b/src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp index 85476b6da2..f9ce52c594 100644 --- a/src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp +++ b/src/test/test_bitcoin.cpp @@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ TestingSetup::~TestingSetup() TestChain100Setup::TestChain100Setup() : TestingSetup(CBaseChainParams::REGTEST) { + // CreateAndProcessBlock() does not support building SegWit blocks, so don't activate in these tests. + // TODO: fix the code to support SegWit blocks. + UpdateVersionBitsParameters(Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT, 0, Consensus::BIP9Deployment::NO_TIMEOUT); // Generate a 100-block chain: coinbaseKey.MakeNewKey(true); CScript scriptPubKey = CScript() << ToByteVector(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()) << OP_CHECKSIG; diff --git a/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp b/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp index 882afb2e20..db537d3932 100644 --- a/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ public: int GetStateSinceHeightFor(const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev) const { return AbstractThresholdConditionChecker::GetStateSinceHeightFor(pindexPrev, paramsDummy, cache); } }; +class TestAlwaysActiveConditionChecker : public TestConditionChecker +{ +public: + int64_t BeginTime(const Consensus::Params& params) const override { return Consensus::BIP9Deployment::ALWAYS_ACTIVE; } +}; + #define CHECKERS 6 class VersionBitsTester @@ -43,6 +49,8 @@ class VersionBitsTester // The first one performs all checks, the second only 50%, the third only 25%, etc... // This is to test whether lack of cached information leads to the same results. TestConditionChecker checker[CHECKERS]; + // Another 6 that assume always active activation + TestAlwaysActiveConditionChecker checker_always[CHECKERS]; // Test counter (to identify failures) int num; @@ -56,6 +64,7 @@ public: } for (unsigned int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { checker[i] = TestConditionChecker(); + checker_always[i] = TestAlwaysActiveConditionChecker(); } vpblock.clear(); return *this; @@ -82,6 +91,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateSinceHeightFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == height, strprintf("Test %i for StateSinceHeight", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateSinceHeightFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == 0, strprintf("Test %i for StateSinceHeight (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -92,6 +102,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_DEFINED, strprintf("Test %i for DEFINED", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -102,6 +113,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_STARTED, strprintf("Test %i for STARTED", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -112,6 +124,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_LOCKED_IN, strprintf("Test %i for LOCKED_IN", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -122,6 +135,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; @@ -132,6 +146,7 @@ public: for (int i = 0; i < CHECKERS; i++) { if (InsecureRandBits(i) == 0) { BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_FAILED, strprintf("Test %i for FAILED", num)); + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(checker_always[i].GetStateFor(vpblock.empty() ? nullptr : vpblock.back()) == THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, strprintf("Test %i for ACTIVE (always active)", num)); } } num++; |