Reduce bignum.h now it is only needed for scriptnum_tests

3 files changed, 0 insertions, 138 deletions

diff --git a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp
index 897fb87e46..fb06fb3435 100644
--- a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
 
 
 
-#include "bignum.h"
 #include "keystore.h"
 #include "main.h"
 #include "net.h"
diff --git a/src/test/Makefile.am b/src/test/Makefile.am
index e12f4904f1..fbc79cf996 100644
--- a/src/test/Makefile.am
+++ b/src/test/Makefile.am
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ test_bitcoin_SOURCES = \
   base32_tests.cpp \
   base58_tests.cpp \
   base64_tests.cpp \
-  bignum_tests.cpp \
   bloom_tests.cpp \
   canonical_tests.cpp \
   checkblock_tests.cpp \
diff --git a/src/test/bignum_tests.cpp b/src/test/bignum_tests.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index 01967c7684..0000000000
--- a/src/test/bignum_tests.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,136 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright (c) 2012-2014 The Bitcoin Core developers
-// Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, see the accompanying
-// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
-
-#include "bignum.h"
-
-#include <limits>
-#include <stdint.h>
-
-#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
-
-BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(bignum_tests)
-
-// Unfortunately there's no standard way of preventing a function from being
-// inlined, so we define a macro for it.
-//
-// You should use it like this:
-//   NOINLINE void function() {...}
-#if defined(__GNUC__)
-// This also works and will be defined for any compiler implementing GCC
-// extensions, such as Clang and ICC.
-#define NOINLINE __attribute__((noinline))
-#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
-#define NOINLINE __declspec(noinline)
-#else
-// We give out a warning because it impacts the correctness of one bignum test.
-#warning You should define NOINLINE for your compiler.
-#define NOINLINE
-#endif
-
-// For the following test case, it is useful to use additional tools.
-//
-// The simplest one to use is the compiler flag -ftrapv, which detects integer
-// overflows and similar errors. However, due to optimizations and compilers
-// taking advantage of undefined behavior sometimes it may not actually detect
-// anything.
-//
-// You can also use compiler-based stack protection to possibly detect possible
-// stack buffer overruns.
-//
-// For more accurate diagnostics, you can use an undefined arithmetic operation
-// detector such as the clang's undefined behaviour checker.
-// See also: http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#controlling-code-generation
-//
-// It might also be useful to use Google's AddressSanitizer to detect
-// stack buffer overruns, which valgrind can't currently detect.
-
-// Let's force this code not to be inlined, in order to actually
-// test a generic version of the function. This increases the chance
-// that -ftrapv will detect overflows.
-NOINLINE void mysetint64(CBigNum& num, int64_t n)
-{
-    num.setint64(n);
-}
-
-// For each number, we do 2 tests: one with inline code, then we reset the
-// value to 0, then the second one with a non-inlined function.
-BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_setint64)
-{
-    int64_t n;
-
-    {
-        n = 0;
-        CBigNum num(n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
-        num.setulong(0);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
-        mysetint64(num, n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
-    }
-    {
-        n = 1;
-        CBigNum num(n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "1");
-        num.setulong(0);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
-        mysetint64(num, n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "1");
-    }
-    {
-        n = -1;
-        CBigNum num(n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-1");
-        num.setulong(0);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
-        mysetint64(num, n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-1");
-    }
-    {
-        n = 5;
-        CBigNum num(n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "5");
-        num.setulong(0);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
-        mysetint64(num, n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "5");
-    }
-    {
-        n = -5;
-        CBigNum num(n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-5");
-        num.setulong(0);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
-        mysetint64(num, n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-5");
-    }
-    {
-        n = std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::min();
-        CBigNum num(n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-9223372036854775808");
-        num.setulong(0);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
-        mysetint64(num, n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "-9223372036854775808");
-    }
-    {
-        n = std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max();
-        CBigNum num(n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "9223372036854775807");
-        num.setulong(0);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "0");
-        mysetint64(num, n);
-        BOOST_CHECK(num.ToString() == "9223372036854775807");
-    }
-}
-
-
-BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bignum_SetHex)
-{
-    std::string hexStr = "deecf97fd890808b9cc0f1b6a3e7a60b400f52710e6ad075b1340755bfa58cc9";
-    CBigNum num;
-    num.SetHex(hexStr);
-    BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(num.GetHex(), hexStr);
-}
-
-BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()