diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2019-07-02 16:28:53 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2019-07-02 16:29:08 +0200 |
commit | c6e42f1ca9c8a2eeb315c68e66dc7e9e8153882a (patch) | |
tree | 62c039e5bb218a1b4a1699be0a9a7e6514a2792f /src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp | |
parent | 6c21a801f3df4942d09d5a33d3dab04807f7bb37 (diff) | |
parent | fa2b083c3feb0522baf652045efa6b73458761a3 (diff) |
Merge #14193: validation: Add missing mempool locks
fa2b083c3feb0522baf652045efa6b73458761a3 [test] Add test to check mempool consistency in case of reorgs (MarcoFalke)
fabeb1f613653a8c1560e4a093a9b6b7a069b60b validation: Add missing mempool locks (MarcoFalke)
fa0c9dbf9156d64a4b9bff858da97825369a9134 txpool: Make nTransactionsUpdated atomic (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Take the mempool read lock during reorgs, so that we don't accidentally read an inconsistent mempool.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK fa2b083c3feb0522baf652045efa6b73458761a3
ryanofsky:
utACK fa2b083c3feb0522baf652045efa6b73458761a3 [EDIT: was ~e284e422e75189794e24fe482819d8b1407857c3~, from bad copy and paste]. Changes since last review: rebase after #15976, adding vTxHashes lock annotation, adding new commit dropping mempool lock for nTransactionsUpdated and making it atomic to avoid deadlock between mempool lock and g_best_block_mutex
Tree-SHA512: cfe7777993589087753e000e3736d79d320dca412383fb77b56bef8946a04049722bf888c11b6f722adf677165185c7e58b4a269f7c5fa25e84dda375f6c8a7d
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp | 152 |
1 files changed, 149 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp b/src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp index 6a9813442b..b3368d44b6 100644 --- a/src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/validation_block_tests.cpp @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <miner.h> #include <pow.h> #include <random.h> +#include <script/standard.h> #include <test/setup_common.h> #include <util/time.h> #include <validation.h> @@ -21,6 +22,8 @@ struct RegtestingSetup : public TestingSetup { RegtestingSetup() : TestingSetup(CBaseChainParams::REGTEST) {} }; +static const std::vector<unsigned char> V_OP_TRUE{OP_TRUE}; + BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(validation_block_tests, RegtestingSetup) struct TestSubscriber : public CValidationInterface { @@ -62,8 +65,21 @@ std::shared_ptr<CBlock> Block(const uint256& prev_hash) pblock->hashPrevBlock = prev_hash; pblock->nTime = ++time; + pubKey.clear(); + { + WitnessV0ScriptHash witness_program; + CSHA256().Write(&V_OP_TRUE[0], V_OP_TRUE.size()).Finalize(witness_program.begin()); + pubKey << OP_0 << ToByteVector(witness_program); + } + + // Make the coinbase transaction with two outputs: + // One zero-value one that has a unique pubkey to make sure that blocks at the same height can have a different hash + // Another one that has the coinbase reward in a P2WSH with OP_TRUE as witness program to make it easy to spend CMutableTransaction txCoinbase(*pblock->vtx[0]); - txCoinbase.vout.resize(1); + txCoinbase.vout.resize(2); + txCoinbase.vout[1].scriptPubKey = pubKey; + txCoinbase.vout[1].nValue = txCoinbase.vout[0].nValue; + txCoinbase.vout[0].nValue = 0; txCoinbase.vin[0].scriptWitness.SetNull(); pblock->vtx[0] = MakeTransactionRef(std::move(txCoinbase)); @@ -72,6 +88,9 @@ std::shared_ptr<CBlock> Block(const uint256& prev_hash) std::shared_ptr<CBlock> FinalizeBlock(std::shared_ptr<CBlock> pblock) { + LOCK(cs_main); // For LookupBlockIndex + GenerateCoinbaseCommitment(*pblock, LookupBlockIndex(pblock->hashPrevBlock), Params().GetConsensus()); + pblock->hashMerkleRoot = BlockMerkleRoot(*pblock); while (!CheckProofOfWork(pblock->GetHash(), pblock->nBits, Params().GetConsensus())) { @@ -82,13 +101,13 @@ std::shared_ptr<CBlock> FinalizeBlock(std::shared_ptr<CBlock> pblock) } // construct a valid block -const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> GoodBlock(const uint256& prev_hash) +std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> GoodBlock(const uint256& prev_hash) { return FinalizeBlock(Block(prev_hash)); } // construct an invalid block (but with a valid header) -const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> BadBlock(const uint256& prev_hash) +std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> BadBlock(const uint256& prev_hash) { auto pblock = Block(prev_hash); @@ -188,4 +207,131 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(processnewblock_signals_ordering) BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(sub.m_expected_tip, ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash()); } +/** + * Test that mempool updates happen atomically with reorgs. + * + * This prevents RPC clients, among others, from retrieving immediately-out-of-date mempool data + * during large reorgs. + * + * The test verifies this by creating a chain of `num_txs` blocks, matures their coinbases, and then + * submits txns spending from their coinbase to the mempool. A fork chain is then processed, + * invalidating the txns and evicting them from the mempool. + * + * We verify that the mempool updates atomically by polling it continuously + * from another thread during the reorg and checking that its size only changes + * once. The size changing exactly once indicates that the polling thread's + * view of the mempool is either consistent with the chain state before reorg, + * or consistent with the chain state after the reorg, and not just consistent + * with some intermediate state during the reorg. + */ +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(mempool_locks_reorg) +{ + bool ignored; + auto ProcessBlock = [&ignored](std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> block) -> bool { + return ProcessNewBlock(Params(), block, /* fForceProcessing */ true, /* fNewBlock */ &ignored); + }; + + // Process all mined blocks + BOOST_REQUIRE(ProcessBlock(std::make_shared<CBlock>(Params().GenesisBlock()))); + auto last_mined = GoodBlock(Params().GenesisBlock().GetHash()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(ProcessBlock(last_mined)); + + // Run the test multiple times + for (int test_runs = 3; test_runs > 0; --test_runs) { + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(last_mined->GetHash(), ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash()); + + // Later on split from here + const uint256 split_hash{last_mined->hashPrevBlock}; + + // Create a bunch of transactions to spend the miner rewards of the + // most recent blocks + std::vector<CTransactionRef> txs; + for (int num_txs = 22; num_txs > 0; --num_txs) { + CMutableTransaction mtx; + mtx.vin.push_back(CTxIn{COutPoint{last_mined->vtx[0]->GetHash(), 1}, CScript{}}); + mtx.vin[0].scriptWitness.stack.push_back(V_OP_TRUE); + mtx.vout.push_back(last_mined->vtx[0]->vout[1]); + mtx.vout[0].nValue -= 1000; + txs.push_back(MakeTransactionRef(mtx)); + + last_mined = GoodBlock(last_mined->GetHash()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(ProcessBlock(last_mined)); + } + + // Mature the inputs of the txs + for (int j = COINBASE_MATURITY; j > 0; --j) { + last_mined = GoodBlock(last_mined->GetHash()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(ProcessBlock(last_mined)); + } + + // Mine a reorg (and hold it back) before adding the txs to the mempool + const uint256 tip_init{last_mined->GetHash()}; + + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>> reorg; + last_mined = GoodBlock(split_hash); + reorg.push_back(last_mined); + for (size_t j = COINBASE_MATURITY + txs.size() + 1; j > 0; --j) { + last_mined = GoodBlock(last_mined->GetHash()); + reorg.push_back(last_mined); + } + + // Add the txs to the tx pool + { + LOCK(cs_main); + CValidationState state; + std::list<CTransactionRef> plTxnReplaced; + for (const auto& tx : txs) { + BOOST_REQUIRE(AcceptToMemoryPool( + ::mempool, + state, + tx, + /* pfMissingInputs */ &ignored, + &plTxnReplaced, + /* bypass_limits */ false, + /* nAbsurdFee */ 0)); + } + } + + // Check that all txs are in the pool + { + LOCK(::mempool.cs); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(::mempool.mapTx.size(), txs.size()); + } + + // Run a thread that simulates an RPC caller that is polling while + // validation is doing a reorg + std::thread rpc_thread{[&]() { + // This thread is checking that the mempool either contains all of + // the transactions invalidated by the reorg, or none of them, and + // not some intermediate amount. + while (true) { + LOCK(::mempool.cs); + if (::mempool.mapTx.size() == 0) { + // We are done with the reorg + break; + } + // Internally, we might be in the middle of the reorg, but + // externally the reorg to the most-proof-of-work chain should + // be atomic. So the caller assumes that the returned mempool + // is consistent. That is, it has all txs that were there + // before the reorg. + assert(::mempool.mapTx.size() == txs.size()); + continue; + } + LOCK(cs_main); + // We are done with the reorg, so the tip must have changed + assert(tip_init != ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash()); + }}; + + // Submit the reorg in this thread to invalidate and remove the txs from the tx pool + for (const auto& b : reorg) { + ProcessBlock(b); + } + // Check that the reorg was eventually successful + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(last_mined->GetHash(), ::ChainActive().Tip()->GetBlockHash()); + + // We can join the other thread, which returns when the reorg was successful + rpc_thread.join(); + } +} BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END() |