aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-03-27 16:28:27 +0200
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-03-27 16:38:14 +0200
commit3de01268b7048a9c85f31dc6d21d44b727e860a5 (patch)
tree5972c90f51e19778073294ce7b6b7d2ab98ff0b5 /src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp
parent68484d64fd79f3ef7b32d0785fc94f97eb87c60b (diff)
parent1f45e2164a7674f716b425a6658c41ca7c30265b (diff)
Merge #10742: scripted-diff: Use scoped enumerations (C++11, "enum class")
1f45e21 scripted-diff: Convert 11 enums into scoped enums (C++11) (practicalswift) Pull request description: Rationale (from Bjarne Stroustrup's ["C++11 FAQ"](http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#enum)): > > The enum classes ("new enums", "strong enums") address three problems with traditional C++ enumerations: > > * conventional enums implicitly convert to int, causing errors when someone does not want an enumeration to act as an integer. > * conventional enums export their enumerators to the surrounding scope, causing name clashes. > * the underlying type of an enum cannot be specified, causing confusion, compatibility problems, and makes forward declaration impossible. > > The new enums are "enum class" because they combine aspects of traditional enumerations (names values) with aspects of classes (scoped members and absence of conversions). Tree-SHA512: 9656e1cf4c3cabd4378c7a38d0c2eaf79e4a54d204a3c5762330840e55ee7e141e188a3efb2b4daf0ef3110bbaff80d8b9253abf2a9b015cdc4d60b49ac2b914
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp b/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp
index 1aa54189b6..7087c26774 100644
--- a/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/txvalidationcache_tests.cpp
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
// Sign:
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig;
- uint256 hash = SignatureHash(scriptPubKey, spends[i], 0, SIGHASH_ALL, 0, SIGVERSION_BASE);
+ uint256 hash = SignatureHash(scriptPubKey, spends[i], 0, SIGHASH_ALL, 0, SigVersion::BASE);
BOOST_CHECK(coinbaseKey.Sign(hash, vchSig));
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
spends[i].vin[0].scriptSig << vchSig;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
// Sign, with a non-DER signature
{
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig;
- uint256 hash = SignatureHash(p2pk_scriptPubKey, spend_tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, 0, SIGVERSION_BASE);
+ uint256 hash = SignatureHash(p2pk_scriptPubKey, spend_tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, 0, SigVersion::BASE);
BOOST_CHECK(coinbaseKey.Sign(hash, vchSig));
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char) 0); // padding byte makes this non-DER
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
// Sign
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig;
- uint256 hash = SignatureHash(spend_tx.vout[2].scriptPubKey, invalid_with_cltv_tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, 0, SIGVERSION_BASE);
+ uint256 hash = SignatureHash(spend_tx.vout[2].scriptPubKey, invalid_with_cltv_tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, 0, SigVersion::BASE);
BOOST_CHECK(coinbaseKey.Sign(hash, vchSig));
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
invalid_with_cltv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(checkinputs_test, TestChain100Setup)
// Sign
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig;
- uint256 hash = SignatureHash(spend_tx.vout[3].scriptPubKey, invalid_with_csv_tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, 0, SIGVERSION_BASE);
+ uint256 hash = SignatureHash(spend_tx.vout[3].scriptPubKey, invalid_with_csv_tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL, 0, SigVersion::BASE);
BOOST_CHECK(coinbaseKey.Sign(hash, vchSig));
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
invalid_with_csv_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << vchSig << 101;