aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorglozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>2021-12-17 15:02:49 +0000
committerglozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>2022-01-17 12:24:43 +0000
commit2db77cd3b835d052de678755bcdde5a645ce2d65 (patch)
treee7b25430b93fd3f39b8858d4ea4e0d0fac45b20c /src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp
parent9ad211c5753dbd148ba6f0ed56854f6364362ca8 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-2db77cd3b835d052de678755bcdde5a645ce2d65.tar.xz
[unit test] different witness in package submission
If/when witness replacement is implemented in the future, this test case can be easily replaced with witness replacement tests.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp120
1 files changed, 120 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp b/src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp
index 6f78b43826..022510d19e 100644
--- a/src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp
@@ -327,4 +327,124 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_submission_tests, TestChain100Setup)
BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx_child->GetHash())));
}
}
+
+// Tests for packages containing transactions that have same-txid-different-witness equivalents in
+// the mempool.
+BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_witness_swap_tests, TestChain100Setup)
+{
+ LOCK(cs_main);
+
+ // Transactions with a same-txid-different-witness transaction in the mempool should be ignored,
+ // and the mempool entry's wtxid returned.
+ CScript witnessScript = CScript() << OP_DROP << OP_TRUE;
+ CScript scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(WitnessV0ScriptHash(witnessScript));
+ auto mtx_parent = CreateValidMempoolTransaction(/*input_transaction=*/ m_coinbase_txns[0], /*vout=*/ 0,
+ /*input_height=*/ 0, /*input_signing_key=*/ coinbaseKey,
+ /*output_destination=*/ scriptPubKey,
+ /*output_amount=*/ CAmount(49 * COIN), /*submit=*/ false);
+ CTransactionRef ptx_parent = MakeTransactionRef(mtx_parent);
+
+ // Make two children with the same txid but different witnesses.
+ CScriptWitness witness1;
+ witness1.stack.push_back(std::vector<unsigned char>(1));
+ witness1.stack.push_back(std::vector<unsigned char>(witnessScript.begin(), witnessScript.end()));
+
+ CScriptWitness witness2(witness1);
+ witness2.stack.push_back(std::vector<unsigned char>(2));
+ witness2.stack.push_back(std::vector<unsigned char>(witnessScript.begin(), witnessScript.end()));
+
+ CKey child_key;
+ child_key.MakeNewKey(true);
+ CScript child_locking_script = GetScriptForDestination(WitnessV0KeyHash(child_key.GetPubKey()));
+ CMutableTransaction mtx_child1;
+ mtx_child1.nVersion = 1;
+ mtx_child1.vin.resize(1);
+ mtx_child1.vin[0].prevout.hash = ptx_parent->GetHash();
+ mtx_child1.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
+ mtx_child1.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript();
+ mtx_child1.vin[0].scriptWitness = witness1;
+ mtx_child1.vout.resize(1);
+ mtx_child1.vout[0].nValue = CAmount(48 * COIN);
+ mtx_child1.vout[0].scriptPubKey = child_locking_script;
+
+ CMutableTransaction mtx_child2{mtx_child1};
+ mtx_child2.vin[0].scriptWitness = witness2;
+
+ CTransactionRef ptx_child1 = MakeTransactionRef(mtx_child1);
+ CTransactionRef ptx_child2 = MakeTransactionRef(mtx_child2);
+
+ // child1 and child2 have the same txid
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ptx_child1->GetHash(), ptx_child2->GetHash());
+ // child1 and child2 have different wtxids
+ BOOST_CHECK(ptx_child1->GetWitnessHash() != ptx_child2->GetWitnessHash());
+
+ // Try submitting Package1{parent, child1} and Package2{parent, child2} where the children are
+ // same-txid-different-witness.
+ {
+ const auto submit_witness1 = ProcessNewPackage(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool,
+ {ptx_parent, ptx_child1}, /*test_accept=*/ false);
+ BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_witness1.m_state.IsValid(),
+ "Package validation unexpectedly failed: " << submit_witness1.m_state.GetRejectReason());
+ auto it_parent1 = submit_witness1.m_tx_results.find(ptx_parent->GetWitnessHash());
+ auto it_child1 = submit_witness1.m_tx_results.find(ptx_child1->GetWitnessHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_parent1 != submit_witness1.m_tx_results.end());
+ BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(it_parent1->second.m_state.IsValid(),
+ "Transaction unexpectedly failed: " << it_parent1->second.m_state.GetRejectReason());
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_child1 != submit_witness1.m_tx_results.end());
+ BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(it_child1->second.m_state.IsValid(),
+ "Transaction unexpectedly failed: " << it_child1->second.m_state.GetRejectReason());
+
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(ptx_parent->GetHash())));
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(ptx_child1->GetHash())));
+
+ const auto submit_witness2 = ProcessNewPackage(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool,
+ {ptx_parent, ptx_child2}, /*test_accept=*/ false);
+ BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_witness2.m_state.IsValid(),
+ "Package validation unexpectedly failed: " << submit_witness2.m_state.GetRejectReason());
+ auto it_parent2_deduped = submit_witness2.m_tx_results.find(ptx_parent->GetWitnessHash());
+ auto it_child2 = submit_witness2.m_tx_results.find(ptx_child2->GetWitnessHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_parent2_deduped != submit_witness2.m_tx_results.end());
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_parent2_deduped->second.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::MEMPOOL_ENTRY);
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_child2 != submit_witness2.m_tx_results.end());
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_child2->second.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::DIFFERENT_WITNESS);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ptx_child1->GetWitnessHash(), it_child2->second.m_other_wtxid.value());
+
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(ptx_child2->GetHash())));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Wtxid(ptx_child2->GetWitnessHash())));
+ }
+
+ // Try submitting Package1{child2, grandchild} where child2 is same-txid-different-witness as
+ // the in-mempool transaction, child1. Since child1 exists in the mempool and its outputs are
+ // available, child2 should be ignored and grandchild should be accepted.
+ //
+ // This tests a potential censorship vector in which an attacker broadcasts a competing package
+ // where a parent's witness is mutated. The honest package should be accepted despite the fact
+ // that we don't allow witness replacement.
+ CKey grandchild_key;
+ grandchild_key.MakeNewKey(true);
+ CScript grandchild_locking_script = GetScriptForDestination(WitnessV0KeyHash(grandchild_key.GetPubKey()));
+ auto mtx_grandchild = CreateValidMempoolTransaction(/*input_transaction=*/ ptx_child2, /* vout=*/ 0,
+ /*input_height=*/ 0, /*input_signing_key=*/ child_key,
+ /*output_destination=*/ grandchild_locking_script,
+ /*output_amount=*/ CAmount(47 * COIN), /*submit=*/ false);
+ CTransactionRef ptx_grandchild = MakeTransactionRef(mtx_grandchild);
+
+ // We already submitted child1 above.
+ {
+ const auto submit_spend_ignored = ProcessNewPackage(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool,
+ {ptx_child2, ptx_grandchild}, /*test_accept=*/ false);
+ BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_spend_ignored.m_state.IsValid(),
+ "Package validation unexpectedly failed: " << submit_spend_ignored.m_state.GetRejectReason());
+ auto it_child2_ignored = submit_spend_ignored.m_tx_results.find(ptx_child2->GetWitnessHash());
+ auto it_grandchild = submit_spend_ignored.m_tx_results.find(ptx_grandchild->GetWitnessHash());
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_child2_ignored != submit_spend_ignored.m_tx_results.end());
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_child2_ignored->second.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::DIFFERENT_WITNESS);
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_grandchild != submit_spend_ignored.m_tx_results.end());
+ BOOST_CHECK(it_grandchild->second.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::VALID);
+
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(ptx_child2->GetHash())));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Wtxid(ptx_child2->GetWitnessHash())));
+ BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Wtxid(ptx_grandchild->GetWitnessHash())));
+ }
+}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()