diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2017-12-12 10:10:14 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2017-12-12 10:11:00 +0100 |
commit | c0902624b0ec6f5fff29eb6e922c58816f395dc8 (patch) | |
tree | 55b0aeead40d1bc462db9b313948cb805abbfa3e /src/test/script_tests.cpp | |
parent | 0e722e8879a8e1eebe02fd14c70c39346c79f95d (diff) | |
parent | 01013f5d2fbe3fa86565c927bf7bb8ec0f525073 (diff) |
Merge #10699: Make all script validation flags backward compatible
01013f5 Simplify tx validation tests (Pieter Wuille)
2dd6f80 Add a test that all flags are softforks (Pieter Wuille)
2851b77 Make all script verification flags softforks (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This change makes `SCRIPT_VERIFY_UPGRADABLE_NOPS` not apply to `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` and `OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY`. This is a no-op as `UPGRADABLE_NOPS` is only set for mempool transactions, and those always have `SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` and `SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY` set as well. The advantage is that setting more flags now always results in a reduction in acceptable scripts (=softfork).
This results in a nice and testable property for validation, for which a new test is added.
This also means that the introduction of a new definition for a NOP or witness version will likely need the following procedure (example OP_NOP8 here)
* Remove OP_NOP8 from being affected by `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS`.
* Add a `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_NOP8`, which only applies to `OP_NOP8`.
* Add a `SCRIPT_VERIFY_NOP8` which implements the new consensus logic.
* Before activation, add `SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_NOP8` to the mempool flags.
* After activation, add `SCRIPT_VERIFY_NOP8` to both the mempool and consensus flags.
Tree-SHA512: d3b4538986ecf646aac9dba13a8d89318baf9e308e258547ca3b99e7c0509747f323edac6b1fea4e87e7d3c01b71193794b41679ae4f86f6e11ed6be3fd62c72
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/script_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/script_tests.cpp | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/script_tests.cpp b/src/test/script_tests.cpp index 57b3e501af..f96d867bc6 100644 --- a/src/test/script_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/script_tests.cpp @@ -166,6 +166,17 @@ void DoTest(const CScript& scriptPubKey, const CScript& scriptSig, const CScript CMutableTransaction tx2 = tx; BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(VerifyScript(scriptSig, scriptPubKey, &scriptWitness, flags, MutableTransactionSignatureChecker(&tx, 0, txCredit.vout[0].nValue), &err) == expect, message); BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(err == scriptError, std::string(FormatScriptError(err)) + " where " + std::string(FormatScriptError((ScriptError_t)scriptError)) + " expected: " + message); + + // Verify that removing flags from a passing test or adding flags to a failing test does not change the result. + for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) { + int extra_flags = InsecureRandBits(16); + int combined_flags = expect ? (flags & ~extra_flags) : (flags | extra_flags); + // Weed out some invalid flag combinations. + if (combined_flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK && ~combined_flags & (SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH | SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS)) continue; + if (combined_flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS && ~combined_flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH) continue; + BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(VerifyScript(scriptSig, scriptPubKey, &scriptWitness, combined_flags, MutableTransactionSignatureChecker(&tx, 0, txCredit.vout[0].nValue), &err) == expect, message + strprintf(" (with flags %x)", combined_flags)); + } + #if defined(HAVE_CONSENSUS_LIB) CDataStream stream(SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION); stream << tx2; |