aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/script_tests.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2020-04-22 13:59:11 +0200
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2020-04-22 14:17:01 +0200
commit19032c750cb48338bd178fd785ed345e87235e2e (patch)
tree12ca76838ddeff66e87d8aa95e22d91b977f81af /src/test/script_tests.cpp
parentc90a9e6fffa73707b6fcd4c39c39b2fc5aaf8398 (diff)
parentccccd5190898ece3ac17aa3178f320d091f221df (diff)
downloadbitcoin-19032c750cb48338bd178fd785ed345e87235e2e.tar.xz
Merge #18612: script: Remove undocumented and unused operator+
ccccd5190898ece3ac17aa3178f320d091f221df script: Remove undocumented and unused operator+ (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This operator has no documented use case and is also unused outside of test code. The test code and all other (imaginary) code that might use this operator is written more clear and concise by the existing CScript push operators for opcodes and data. Removing the operator is also going to protect against accidentally reintroducing bugs like this https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/6ff5f718b6a67797b2b3bab8905d607ad216ee21#diff-8458adcedc17d046942185cb709ff5c3L1135 (last time it was used). ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK ccccd5190898ece3ac17aa3178f320d091f221df Tree-SHA512: 43898ac77e4d9643d9f8ac6f8f65497a4f0bbb1fb5dcaecc839c3719aa36181ba77befb213e59a9f33a20a29e0173a0e9c4763b1930940b32c3d1598b3e39af9
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/script_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/test/script_tests.cpp46
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/script_tests.cpp b/src/test/script_tests.cpp
index 4c2d35c502..56454f61f3 100644
--- a/src/test/script_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/script_tests.cpp
@@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ struct KeyData
KeyData()
{
-
key0.Set(vchKey0, vchKey0 + 32, false);
key0C.Set(vchKey0, vchKey0 + 32, true);
pubkey0 = key0.GetPubKey();
@@ -272,9 +271,9 @@ private:
void DoPush(const std::vector<unsigned char>& data)
{
- DoPush();
- push = data;
- havePush = true;
+ DoPush();
+ push = data;
+ havePush = true;
}
public:
@@ -306,10 +305,10 @@ public:
return *this;
}
- TestBuilder& Add(const CScript& _script)
+ TestBuilder& Opcode(const opcodetype& _op)
{
DoPush();
- spendTx.vin[0].scriptSig += _script;
+ spendTx.vin[0].scriptSig << _op;
return *this;
}
@@ -326,8 +325,9 @@ public:
return *this;
}
- TestBuilder& Push(const CScript& _script) {
- DoPush(std::vector<unsigned char>(_script.begin(), _script.end()));
+ TestBuilder& Push(const CScript& _script)
+ {
+ DoPush(std::vector<unsigned char>(_script.begin(), _script.end()));
return *this;
}
@@ -681,22 +681,22 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(script_build)
tests.push_back(TestBuilder(CScript() << OP_2 << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey1C) << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey1C) << OP_2 << OP_CHECKMULTISIG,
"2-of-2 with two identical keys and sigs pushed using OP_DUP but no SIGPUSHONLY", 0
- ).Num(0).PushSig(keys.key1).Add(CScript() << OP_DUP));
+ ).Num(0).PushSig(keys.key1).Opcode(OP_DUP));
tests.push_back(TestBuilder(CScript() << OP_2 << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey1C) << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey1C) << OP_2 << OP_CHECKMULTISIG,
"2-of-2 with two identical keys and sigs pushed using OP_DUP", SCRIPT_VERIFY_SIGPUSHONLY
- ).Num(0).PushSig(keys.key1).Add(CScript() << OP_DUP).ScriptError(SCRIPT_ERR_SIG_PUSHONLY));
+ ).Num(0).PushSig(keys.key1).Opcode(OP_DUP).ScriptError(SCRIPT_ERR_SIG_PUSHONLY));
tests.push_back(TestBuilder(CScript() << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey2C) << OP_CHECKSIG,
"P2SH(P2PK) with non-push scriptSig but no P2SH or SIGPUSHONLY", 0, true
- ).PushSig(keys.key2).Add(CScript() << OP_NOP8).PushRedeem());
+ ).PushSig(keys.key2).Opcode(OP_NOP8).PushRedeem());
tests.push_back(TestBuilder(CScript() << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey2C) << OP_CHECKSIG,
"P2PK with non-push scriptSig but with P2SH validation", 0
- ).PushSig(keys.key2).Add(CScript() << OP_NOP8));
+ ).PushSig(keys.key2).Opcode(OP_NOP8));
tests.push_back(TestBuilder(CScript() << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey2C) << OP_CHECKSIG,
"P2SH(P2PK) with non-push scriptSig but no SIGPUSHONLY", SCRIPT_VERIFY_P2SH, true
- ).PushSig(keys.key2).Add(CScript() << OP_NOP8).PushRedeem().ScriptError(SCRIPT_ERR_SIG_PUSHONLY));
+ ).PushSig(keys.key2).Opcode(OP_NOP8).PushRedeem().ScriptError(SCRIPT_ERR_SIG_PUSHONLY));
tests.push_back(TestBuilder(CScript() << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey2C) << OP_CHECKSIG,
"P2SH(P2PK) with non-push scriptSig but not P2SH", SCRIPT_VERIFY_SIGPUSHONLY, true
- ).PushSig(keys.key2).Add(CScript() << OP_NOP8).PushRedeem().ScriptError(SCRIPT_ERR_SIG_PUSHONLY));
+ ).PushSig(keys.key2).Opcode(OP_NOP8).PushRedeem().ScriptError(SCRIPT_ERR_SIG_PUSHONLY));
tests.push_back(TestBuilder(CScript() << OP_2 << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey1C) << ToByteVector(keys.pubkey1C) << OP_2 << OP_CHECKMULTISIG,
"2-of-2 with two identical keys and sigs pushed", SCRIPT_VERIFY_SIGPUSHONLY
).Num(0).PushSig(keys.key1).PushSig(keys.key1));
@@ -1470,24 +1470,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(script_HasValidOps)
BOOST_CHECK(!script.HasValidOps());
}
-BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(script_can_append_self)
-{
- CScript s, d;
-
- s = ScriptFromHex("00");
- s += s;
- d = ScriptFromHex("0000");
- BOOST_CHECK(s == d);
-
- // check doubling a script that's large enough to require reallocation
- static const char hex[] = "04678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb649f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f";
- s = CScript() << ParseHex(hex) << OP_CHECKSIG;
- d = CScript() << ParseHex(hex) << OP_CHECKSIG << ParseHex(hex) << OP_CHECKSIG;
- s += s;
- BOOST_CHECK(s == d);
-}
-
-
#if defined(HAVE_CONSENSUS_LIB)
/* Test simple (successful) usage of bitcoinconsensus_verify_script */