diff options
author | Ava Chow <github@achow101.com> | 2024-06-17 17:09:18 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ava Chow <github@achow101.com> | 2024-06-17 17:09:18 -0400 |
commit | ddf2ebd4659e926c5c6ee6726511b0b88bf7c2e0 (patch) | |
tree | b58d747b2676dff61342636a0faf742847981214 /src/test/node_warnings_tests.cpp | |
parent | d97ddbe797f5b8b3bca0ee71b692e542b8990195 (diff) | |
parent | 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81 (diff) |
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30058: Encapsulate warnings in generalized node::Warnings and remove globals
260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81 refactor: remove warnings globals (stickies-v)
9c4b0b7ce459765fa1a63b410c3423b90f0d2a5f node: update uiInterface whenever warnings updated (stickies-v)
b071ad9770b7ae7fc718dcbfdc8f62dffbf6cfee introduce and use the generalized `node::Warnings` interface (stickies-v)
20e616f86444d00712ac7eb840666e2b0378af4a move-only: move warnings from common to node (stickies-v)
bed29c481aebeb2b0160450c63c03cc68fb89bc6 refactor: remove unnecessary AppendWarning helper function (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- moves warnings from common to the node library and into the node namespace (as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29845#discussion_r1570069541)
- generalizes the warnings interface to `Warnings::Set()` and `Warnings::Unset()` methods, instead of having a separate function and globals for each warning. As a result, this simplifies the `kernel::Notifications` interface.
- removes warnings.cpp from the kernel library
- removes warning globals
- adds testing for the warning logic
Behaviour change introduced:
- the `-alertnotify` command is executed for all `KernelNotifications::warningSet` calls, which now also covers the `LARGE_WORK_INVALID_CHAIN` warning
- the GUI is updated automatically whenever a warning is (un)set, covering some code paths where it previously wouldn't be, e.g. when `node::AbortNode()` is called, or for the `LARGE_WORK_INVALID_CHAIN` warning
Some discussion points:
- ~is `const std::string& id` the best way to refer to warnings? Enums are an obvious alternative, but since we need to define warnings across libraries, strings seem like a straightforward solution.~ _edit: updated approach to use `node::Warning` and `kernel::Warning` enums._
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81. Only change since last review was rebasing
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 260f8da71a35232d859d7705861fc1a88bfbbe81
Tree-SHA512: a3fcedaee0d3ad64e9c111aeb30665162f98e0e72acd6a70b76ff2ddf4f0a34da4f97ce353c322a1668ca6ee4d8a81cc6e6d170c5bbeb7a43cffdaf66646b588
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/node_warnings_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/node_warnings_tests.cpp | 52 |
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/node_warnings_tests.cpp b/src/test/node_warnings_tests.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2bcc2c95ed --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/node_warnings_tests.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +// Copyright (c) 2024-present The Bitcoin Core developers +// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying +// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. +// + +#include <node/warnings.h> +#include <util/translation.h> + +#include <test/util/setup_common.h> + +#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> + +BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(node_warnings_tests, BasicTestingSetup) + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(warnings) +{ + node::Warnings warnings; + // On pre-release builds, a warning is generated automatically + warnings.Unset(node::Warning::PRE_RELEASE_TEST_BUILD); + + // For these tests, we don't care what the exact warnings are, so + // just refer to them as warning_1 and warning_2 + const auto warning_1{node::Warning::CLOCK_OUT_OF_SYNC}; + const auto warning_2{node::Warning::FATAL_INTERNAL_ERROR}; + + // Ensure we start without any warnings + BOOST_CHECK(warnings.GetMessages().size() == 0); + // Add two warnings + BOOST_CHECK(warnings.Set(warning_1, _("warning 1"))); + BOOST_CHECK(warnings.Set(warning_2, _("warning 2"))); + // Unset the second one + BOOST_CHECK(warnings.Unset(warning_2)); + // Since it's already been unset, this should return false + BOOST_CHECK(!warnings.Unset(warning_2)); + // We should now be able to set w2 again + BOOST_CHECK(warnings.Set(warning_2, _("warning 2 - revision 1"))); + // Setting w2 again should return false since it's already set + BOOST_CHECK(!warnings.Set(warning_2, _("warning 2 - revision 2"))); + + // Verify messages are correct + const auto messages{warnings.GetMessages()}; + BOOST_CHECK(messages.size() == 2); + BOOST_CHECK(messages[0].original == "warning 1"); + BOOST_CHECK(messages[1].original == "warning 2 - revision 1"); + + // Clearing all warnings should also clear all messages + BOOST_CHECK(warnings.Unset(warning_1)); + BOOST_CHECK(warnings.Unset(warning_2)); + BOOST_CHECK(warnings.GetMessages().size() == 0); +} + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END() |