Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28065: fuzz: Flatten all FUZZ_TARGET macros into one

fa6dfaaf45bde465969fa7d8fa6b6574a497a6ca scripted-diff: Use new FUZZ_TARGET macro everywhere (MarcoFalke)
fa36ad8b091c70190491280dcf0794e94e34a9ed fuzz: Accept options in FUZZ_TARGET macro (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  The `FUZZ_TARGET` macros have many issues:
  * The developer will have to pick the right macro to pass the wanted option.
  * Adding a new option requires doubling the number of existing macros in the worst case.

  Fix all issues by using only a single macro.

  This refactor does not change behavior.

ACKs for top commit:
  dergoegge:
    ACK fa6dfaaf45bde465969fa7d8fa6b6574a497a6ca

Tree-SHA512: 49a34553867a1734ce89e616b2d7c29b784a67cd8990db6573f0c7b18957636ef0c81d3d0d444a04c12cdc98bc4c4aa7a2ec94e6232dc363620a746e28416444

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/mini_miner.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/mini_miner.cpp
index 2b371f6d5f..e17e2bad60 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/mini_miner.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/mini_miner.cpp
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void initialize_miner()
 }
 
 // Test that the MiniMiner can run with various outpoints and feerates.
-FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(mini_miner, initialize_miner)
+FUZZ_TARGET(mini_miner, .init = initialize_miner)
 {
     FuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data_provider{buffer.data(), buffer.size()};
     CTxMemPool pool{CTxMemPool::Options{}};
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(mini_miner, initialize_miner)
 }
 
 // Test that MiniMiner and BlockAssembler build the same block given the same transactions and constraints.
-FUZZ_TARGET_INIT(mini_miner_selection, initialize_miner)
+FUZZ_TARGET(mini_miner_selection, .init = initialize_miner)
 {
     FuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data_provider{buffer.data(), buffer.size()};
     CTxMemPool pool{CTxMemPool::Options{}};