Do not use uppercase characters in source code filenames

1 files changed, 385 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e5f914ba8a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,385 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2011-2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
+// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
+// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
+
+// Unit tests for denial-of-service detection/prevention code
+
+#include <chainparams.h>
+#include <keystore.h>
+#include <net.h>
+#include <net_processing.h>
+#include <pow.h>
+#include <script/sign.h>
+#include <serialize.h>
+#include <util.h>
+#include <validation.h>
+
+#include <test/test_bitcoin.h>
+
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
+
+// Tests these internal-to-net_processing.cpp methods:
+extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransactionRef& tx, NodeId peer);
+extern void EraseOrphansFor(NodeId peer);
+extern unsigned int LimitOrphanTxSize(unsigned int nMaxOrphans);
+struct COrphanTx {
+    CTransactionRef tx;
+    NodeId fromPeer;
+    int64_t nTimeExpire;
+};
+extern std::map<uint256, COrphanTx> mapOrphanTransactions;
+
+static CService ip(uint32_t i)
+{
+    struct in_addr s;
+    s.s_addr = i;
+    return CService(CNetAddr(s), Params().GetDefaultPort());
+}
+
+static NodeId id = 0;
+
+void UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(NodeId node, int64_t time_in_seconds);
+
+BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(denialofservice_tests, TestingSetup)
+
+// Test eviction of an outbound peer whose chain never advances
+// Mock a node connection, and use mocktime to simulate a peer
+// which never sends any headers messages.  PeerLogic should
+// decide to evict that outbound peer, after the appropriate timeouts.
+// Note that we protect 4 outbound nodes from being subject to
+// this logic; this test takes advantage of that protection only
+// being applied to nodes which send headers with sufficient
+// work.
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
+{
+    std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false);
+
+    // Mock an outbound peer
+    CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
+    CNode dummyNode1(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false);
+    dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+
+    peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
+    dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
+    dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
+
+    // This test requires that we have a chain with non-zero work.
+    LOCK(cs_main);
+    BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip() != nullptr);
+    BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork > 0);
+
+    // Test starts here
+    LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders
+    LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_vSend);
+    BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0);
+    dummyNode1.vSendMsg.clear();
+
+    int64_t nStartTime = GetTime();
+    // Wait 21 minutes
+    SetMockTime(nStartTime+21*60);
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders
+    BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0);
+    // Wait 3 more minutes
+    SetMockTime(nStartTime+24*60);
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in disconnect
+    BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.fDisconnect == true);
+    SetMockTime(0);
+
+    bool dummy;
+    peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy);
+}
+
+static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidation &peerLogic)
+{
+    CAddress addr(ip(GetRandInt(0xffffffff)), NODE_NONE);
+    vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false));
+    CNode &node = *vNodes.back();
+    node.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+
+    peerLogic.InitializeNode(&node);
+    node.nVersion = 1;
+    node.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
+
+    CConnmanTest::AddNode(node);
+}
+
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
+{
+    const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus();
+    constexpr int nMaxOutbound = 8;
+    CConnman::Options options;
+    options.nMaxConnections = 125;
+    options.nMaxOutbound = nMaxOutbound;
+    options.nMaxFeeler = 1;
+
+    connman->Init(options);
+    std::vector<CNode *> vNodes;
+
+    // Mock some outbound peers
+    for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) {
+        AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic);
+    }
+
+    peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams);
+
+    // No nodes should be marked for disconnection while we have no extra peers
+    for (const CNode *node : vNodes) {
+        BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false);
+    }
+
+    SetMockTime(GetTime() + 3*consensusParams.nPowTargetSpacing + 1);
+
+    // Now tip should definitely be stale, and we should look for an extra
+    // outbound peer
+    peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams);
+    BOOST_CHECK(connman->GetTryNewOutboundPeer());
+
+    // Still no peers should be marked for disconnection
+    for (const CNode *node : vNodes) {
+        BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false);
+    }
+
+    // If we add one more peer, something should get marked for eviction
+    // on the next check (since we're mocking the time to be in the future, the
+    // required time connected check should be satisfied).
+    AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic);
+
+    peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams);
+    for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound; ++i) {
+        BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false);
+    }
+    // Last added node should get marked for eviction
+    BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == true);
+
+    vNodes.back()->fDisconnect = false;
+
+    // Update the last announced block time for the last
+    // peer, and check that the next newest node gets evicted.
+    UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(vNodes.back()->GetId(), GetTime());
+
+    peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams);
+    for (int i=0; i<nMaxOutbound-1; ++i) {
+        BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false);
+    }
+    BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[nMaxOutbound-1]->fDisconnect == true);
+    BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == false);
+
+    bool dummy;
+    for (const CNode *node : vNodes) {
+        peerLogic->FinalizeNode(node->GetId(), dummy);
+    }
+
+    CConnmanTest::ClearNodes();
+}
+
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
+{
+    std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false);
+
+    connman->ClearBanned();
+    CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
+    CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", true);
+    dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+    peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
+    dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
+    dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
+    {
+        LOCK(cs_main);
+        Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); // Should get banned
+    }
+    LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy);
+    BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1));
+    BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not banned
+
+    CAddress addr2(ip(0xa0b0c002), NODE_NONE);
+    CNode dummyNode2(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, 1, 1, CAddress(), "", true);
+    dummyNode2.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+    peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode2);
+    dummyNode2.nVersion = 1;
+    dummyNode2.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
+    {
+        LOCK(cs_main);
+        Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50);
+    }
+    LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing);
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2, interruptDummy);
+    BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr2)); // 2 not banned yet...
+    BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1));  // ... but 1 still should be
+    {
+        LOCK(cs_main);
+        Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50);
+    }
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2, interruptDummy);
+    BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr2));
+
+    bool dummy;
+    peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy);
+    peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode2.GetId(), dummy);
+}
+
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore)
+{
+    std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false);
+
+    connman->ClearBanned();
+    gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", "111"); // because 11 is my favorite number
+    CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
+    CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 3, 1, CAddress(), "", true);
+    dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+    peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
+    dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
+    dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
+    {
+        LOCK(cs_main);
+        Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100);
+    }
+    LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy);
+    BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1));
+    {
+        LOCK(cs_main);
+        Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 10);
+    }
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy);
+    BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr1));
+    {
+        LOCK(cs_main);
+        Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 1);
+    }
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy);
+    BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1));
+    gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", std::to_string(DEFAULT_BANSCORE_THRESHOLD));
+
+    bool dummy;
+    peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy);
+}
+
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
+{
+    std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false);
+
+    connman->ClearBanned();
+    int64_t nStartTime = GetTime();
+    SetMockTime(nStartTime); // Overrides future calls to GetTime()
+
+    CAddress addr(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
+    CNode dummyNode(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 4, 4, CAddress(), "", true);
+    dummyNode.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+    peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode);
+    dummyNode.nVersion = 1;
+    dummyNode.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
+
+    {
+        LOCK(cs_main);
+        Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), 100);
+    }
+    LOCK(dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing);
+    peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode, interruptDummy);
+    BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr));
+
+    SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60);
+    BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr));
+
+    SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60*24+1);
+    BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr));
+
+    bool dummy;
+    peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode.GetId(), dummy);
+}
+
+static CTransactionRef RandomOrphan()
+{
+    std::map<uint256, COrphanTx>::iterator it;
+    LOCK(cs_main);
+    it = mapOrphanTransactions.lower_bound(InsecureRand256());
+    if (it == mapOrphanTransactions.end())
+        it = mapOrphanTransactions.begin();
+    return it->second.tx;
+}
+
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_mapOrphans)
+{
+    CKey key;
+    key.MakeNewKey(true);
+    CBasicKeyStore keystore;
+    keystore.AddKey(key);
+
+    // 50 orphan transactions:
+    for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++)
+    {
+        CMutableTransaction tx;
+        tx.vin.resize(1);
+        tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
+        tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = InsecureRand256();
+        tx.vin[0].scriptSig << OP_1;
+        tx.vout.resize(1);
+        tx.vout[0].nValue = 1*CENT;
+        tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(key.GetPubKey().GetID());
+
+        AddOrphanTx(MakeTransactionRef(tx), i);
+    }
+
+    // ... and 50 that depend on other orphans:
+    for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++)
+    {
+        CTransactionRef txPrev = RandomOrphan();
+
+        CMutableTransaction tx;
+        tx.vin.resize(1);
+        tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
+        tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txPrev->GetHash();
+        tx.vout.resize(1);
+        tx.vout[0].nValue = 1*CENT;
+        tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(key.GetPubKey().GetID());
+        SignSignature(keystore, *txPrev, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL);
+
+        AddOrphanTx(MakeTransactionRef(tx), i);
+    }
+
+    // This really-big orphan should be ignored:
+    for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+    {
+        CTransactionRef txPrev = RandomOrphan();
+
+        CMutableTransaction tx;
+        tx.vout.resize(1);
+        tx.vout[0].nValue = 1*CENT;
+        tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(key.GetPubKey().GetID());
+        tx.vin.resize(2777);
+        for (unsigned int j = 0; j < tx.vin.size(); j++)
+        {
+            tx.vin[j].prevout.n = j;
+            tx.vin[j].prevout.hash = txPrev->GetHash();
+        }
+        SignSignature(keystore, *txPrev, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL);
+        // Re-use same signature for other inputs
+        // (they don't have to be valid for this test)
+        for (unsigned int j = 1; j < tx.vin.size(); j++)
+            tx.vin[j].scriptSig = tx.vin[0].scriptSig;
+
+        BOOST_CHECK(!AddOrphanTx(MakeTransactionRef(tx), i));
+    }
+
+    LOCK(cs_main);
+    // Test EraseOrphansFor:
+    for (NodeId i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+    {
+        size_t sizeBefore = mapOrphanTransactions.size();
+        EraseOrphansFor(i);
+        BOOST_CHECK(mapOrphanTransactions.size() < sizeBefore);
+    }
+
+    // Test LimitOrphanTxSize() function:
+    LimitOrphanTxSize(40);
+    BOOST_CHECK(mapOrphanTransactions.size() <= 40);
+    LimitOrphanTxSize(10);
+    BOOST_CHECK(mapOrphanTransactions.size() <= 10);
+    LimitOrphanTxSize(0);
+    BOOST_CHECK(mapOrphanTransactions.empty());
+}
+
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()