diff options
| author | MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2022-05-16 16:45:53 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2022-05-27 16:59:45 +0200 |
| commit | fa8aa0aa8180c3a0369c7589b8747666778a0deb (patch) | |
| tree | fbcf67e1dc84ff00236a5a0faee5511d02be8e32 /src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp | |
| parent | 3ba6dd6f4bb42bfab48194ce5f44850b0109451a (diff) | |
| download | bitcoin-fa8aa0aa8180c3a0369c7589b8747666778a0deb.tar.xz | |
Pass Peer& to Misbehaving()
`Misbehaving` has several coding related issues (ignoring the conceptual
issues here for now):
* It is public, but it is not supposed to be called from outside of
net_processing. Fix that by making it private and creating a public
`UnitTestMisbehaving` method for unit testing only.
* It doesn't do anything if a `nullptr` is passed. It would be less
confusing to just skip the call instead. Fix that by passing `Peer&`
to `Misbehaving()`.
* It calls `GetPeerRef`, causing `!m_peer_mutex` lock annotations to be
propagated. This is harmless, but verbose. Fix it by removing the no
longer needed call to `GetPeerRef` and the no longer needed lock
annotations.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp index 3b4a6f2637..c87ed82c88 100644 --- a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement) peerLogic->InitializeNode(nodes[0]); nodes[0]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true; connman->AddTestNode(*nodes[0]); - peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[0]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, /*message=*/""); // Should be discouraged + peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[0]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD); // Should be discouraged { LOCK(nodes[0]->cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[0])); @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement) peerLogic->InitializeNode(nodes[1]); nodes[1]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true; connman->AddTestNode(*nodes[1]); - peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[1]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD - 1, /*message=*/""); + peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[1]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD - 1); { LOCK(nodes[1]->cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[1])); @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement) // [1] is not discouraged/disconnected yet. BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[1])); BOOST_CHECK(!nodes[1]->fDisconnect); - peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[1]->GetId(), 1, /*message=*/""); // [1] reaches discouragement threshold + peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[1]->GetId(), 1); // [1] reaches discouragement threshold { LOCK(nodes[1]->cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[1])); @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement) peerLogic->InitializeNode(nodes[2]); nodes[2]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true; connman->AddTestNode(*nodes[2]); - peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[2]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, /*message=*/""); + peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[2]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD); { LOCK(nodes[2]->cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[2])); @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode); dummyNode.fSuccessfullyConnected = true; - peerLogic->Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, /*message=*/""); + peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD); { LOCK(dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing); BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode)); |