aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>2021-01-20 11:26:43 +0100
committerMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2021-04-02 18:32:46 +0200
commit4d6e246fa46f2309e2998b542e4c104d73d29071 (patch)
treea96b2df57aff9577c8e7c7b85fe5afa8173431c3 /src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
parente08f3193b543017702d000c2263bccbefa981c14 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-4d6e246fa46f2309e2998b542e4c104d73d29071.tar.xz
test: use pointers in denialofservice_tests/peer_discouragement
This is a non-functional change that replaces the `CNode` on-stack variables with `CNode` pointers. The reason for this is that it would allow us to add those `CNode`s to `CConnman::vNodes[]` which in turn would allow us to check that they are disconnected properly - a `CNode` object must be in `CConnman::vNodes[]` in order for its `fDisconnect` flag to be set. If we store pointers to the on-stack variables in `CConnman` then it would crash at the end, trying to `delete` them.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp69
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
index 7557d4618a..1769664a6c 100644
--- a/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <test/util/setup_common.h>
+#include <array>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
@@ -213,42 +214,54 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
auto peerLogic = PeerManager::make(chainparams, *connman, *m_node.addrman, banman.get(),
*m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool, false);
+ const std::array<CAddress, 2> addr{CAddress{ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE},
+ CAddress{ip(0xa0b0c002), NODE_NONE}};
+
+ const CNetAddr other_addr{ip(0xa0b0ff01)}; // Not any of addr[].
+
+ std::array<CNode*, 2> nodes;
+
banman->ClearBanned();
- CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
- CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, /* nKeyedNetGroupIn */ 0, /* nLocalHostNonceIn */ 0, CAddress(), /* pszDest */ "", ConnectionType::INBOUND, /* inbound_onion */ false);
- dummyNode1.SetCommonVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
- peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
- dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
- peerLogic->Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, /* message */ ""); // Should be discouraged
+ nodes[0] = new CNode{id++, NODE_NETWORK, INVALID_SOCKET, addr[0], /* nKeyedNetGroupIn */ 0,
+ /* nLocalHostNonceIn */ 0, CAddress(), /* pszDest */ "",
+ ConnectionType::INBOUND, /* inbound_onion */ false};
+ nodes[0]->SetCommonVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+ peerLogic->InitializeNode(nodes[0]);
+ nodes[0]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
+ peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[0]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, /* message */ ""); // Should be discouraged
{
- LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
- BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1));
+ LOCK(nodes[0]->cs_sendProcessing);
+ BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[0]));
}
- BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr1));
- BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not discouraged
-
- CAddress addr2(ip(0xa0b0c002), NODE_NONE);
- CNode dummyNode2(id++, NODE_NETWORK, INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, /* nKeyedNetGroupIn */ 1, /* nLocalHostNonceIn */ 1, CAddress(), /* pszDest */ "", ConnectionType::INBOUND, /* inbound_onion */ false);
- dummyNode2.SetCommonVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
- peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode2);
- dummyNode2.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
- peerLogic->Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD - 1, /* message */ "");
+ BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[0]));
+ BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(other_addr)); // Different address, not discouraged
+
+ nodes[1] = new CNode{id++, NODE_NETWORK, INVALID_SOCKET, addr[1], /* nKeyedNetGroupIn */ 1,
+ /* nLocalHostNonceIn */ 1, CAddress(), /* pszDest */ "",
+ ConnectionType::INBOUND, /* inbound_onion */ false};
+ nodes[1]->SetCommonVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+ peerLogic->InitializeNode(nodes[1]);
+ nodes[1]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
+ peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[1]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD - 1, /* message */ "");
{
- LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing);
- BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2));
+ LOCK(nodes[1]->cs_sendProcessing);
+ BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[1]));
}
- BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(addr2)); // 2 not discouraged yet...
- BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be
- peerLogic->Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 1, /* message */ ""); // 2 reaches discouragement threshold
+ BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[1])); // [1] not discouraged yet...
+ BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[0])); // ... but [0] still should be
+ peerLogic->Misbehaving(nodes[1]->GetId(), 1, /* message */ ""); // [1] reaches discouragement threshold
{
- LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing);
- BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2));
+ LOCK(nodes[1]->cs_sendProcessing);
+ BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[1]));
}
- BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr1)); // Expect both 1 and 2
- BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr2)); // to be discouraged now
+ // Expect both [0] and [1] to be discouraged now.
+ BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[0]));
+ BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[1]));
- peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1);
- peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode2);
+ for (CNode* node : nodes) {
+ peerLogic->FinalizeNode(*node);
+ delete node;
+ }
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)