aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSuhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>2022-08-02 16:48:57 -0400
committerSuhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>2022-08-29 08:10:35 -0400
commited6cddd98e32263fc116a4380af6d66da20da990 (patch)
treea17ba16c99aef7d0b774f8910e6e44439eb2bfe6 /src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp
parent551a8d957c4c44afbd0d608fcdf7c6a4352babce (diff)
downloadbitcoin-ed6cddd98e32263fc116a4380af6d66da20da990.tar.xz
Require callers of AcceptBlockHeader() to perform anti-dos checks
In order to prevent memory DoS, we must ensure that we don't accept a new header into memory until we've performed anti-DoS checks, such as verifying that the header is part of a sufficiently high work chain. This commit adds a new argument to AcceptBlockHeader() so that we can ensure that all call-sites which might cause a new header to be accepted into memory have to grapple with the question of whether the header is safe to accept, or needs further validation. This patch also fixes two places where low-difficulty-headers could have been processed without such validation (processing an unrequested block from the network, and processing a compact block). Credit to Niklas Gögge for noticing this issue, and thanks to Sjors Provoost for test code.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp b/src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp
index 1a182209b8..2798e998af 100644
--- a/src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/blockfilter_index_tests.cpp
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ bool BuildChainTestingSetup::BuildChain(const CBlockIndex* pindex,
CBlockHeader header = block->GetBlockHeader();
BlockValidationState state;
- if (!Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlockHeaders({header}, state, &pindex)) {
+ if (!Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlockHeaders({header}, true, state, &pindex)) {
return false;
}
}
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
uint256 chainA_last_header = last_header;
for (size_t i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
const auto& block = chainA[i];
- BOOST_REQUIRE(Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlock(block, true, nullptr));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlock(block, true, true, nullptr));
}
for (size_t i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
const auto& block = chainA[i];
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
uint256 chainB_last_header = last_header;
for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
const auto& block = chainB[i];
- BOOST_REQUIRE(Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlock(block, true, nullptr));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlock(block, true, true, nullptr));
}
for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
const auto& block = chainB[i];
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, BuildChainTestingSetup)
// Reorg back to chain A.
for (size_t i = 2; i < 4; i++) {
const auto& block = chainA[i];
- BOOST_REQUIRE(Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlock(block, true, nullptr));
+ BOOST_REQUIRE(Assert(m_node.chainman)->ProcessNewBlock(block, true, true, nullptr));
}
// Check that chain A and B blocks can be retrieved.