[addrman] Add Add_() inner function, fix Add() return semantics

Previously, Add() would return true if the function created a new
AddressInfo object, even if that object could not be successfully
entered into the new table and was deleted. That would happen if the new
table position was already taken and the existing entry could not be
removed.

Instead, return true if the new AddressInfo object is successfully
entered into the new table. This fixes a bug in the "Added %i addresses"
log, which would not always accurately log how many addresses had been
added.

p2p_addrv2_relay.py and p2p_addr_relay.py need to be updated since they
were incorrectly asserting on the buggy log (assuming that addresses are
added to addrman, when there could in fact be new table position
collisions that prevent some of those address records from being added).

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp b/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
index 991bfa5efc..eabc11c467 100644
--- a/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_tried_collisions)
     //Test: tried table collision!
     CService addr1 = ResolveService("250.1.1." + ToString(++num_addrs));
     uint32_t collisions{1};
-    BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add({CAddress(addr1, NODE_NONE)}, source));
+    BOOST_CHECK(!addrman.Add({CAddress(addr1, NODE_NONE)}, source));
     BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(addrman.size(), num_addrs - collisions);
 
     CService addr2 = ResolveService("250.1.1." + ToString(++num_addrs));