aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com>2017-04-26 18:15:07 -0700
committerJimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com>2017-05-02 11:01:39 -0700
commited36de59e484ecdc22f464948d08a94a8b7fadbb (patch)
tree85bdd01e3bcd98c0ba403913a6a27e74fe773730 /src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
parent8f3e38477e30abd9dd0e24a4d612126117f7793c (diff)
[tests] Update Unit Test for addrman.h/addrman.cpp
Add test for adding multiple addresses to address manager Clean up unnecessary modulo operations Add test for GetNewBucket's alternate method signature
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/addrman_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/test/addrman_tests.cpp26
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp b/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
index 39fa381dd0..a1194bae3b 100644
--- a/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_simple)
// Test 2: Does Addrman::Add work as expected.
CService addr1 = ResolveService("250.1.1.1", 8333);
- addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1, NODE_NONE), source);
+ BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1, NODE_NONE), source));
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 1);
CAddrInfo addr_ret1 = addrman.Select();
BOOST_CHECK(addr_ret1.ToString() == "250.1.1.1:8333");
@@ -99,14 +99,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_simple)
// Test 3: Does IP address deduplication work correctly.
// Expected dup IP should not be added.
CService addr1_dup = ResolveService("250.1.1.1", 8333);
- addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1_dup, NODE_NONE), source);
+ BOOST_CHECK(!addrman.Add(CAddress(addr1_dup, NODE_NONE), source));
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 1);
// Test 5: New table has one addr and we add a diff addr we should
// have two addrs.
CService addr2 = ResolveService("250.1.1.2", 8333);
- addrman.Add(CAddress(addr2, NODE_NONE), source);
+ BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add(CAddress(addr2, NODE_NONE), source));
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2);
// Test 6: AddrMan::Clear() should empty the new table.
@@ -114,6 +114,13 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_simple)
BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 0);
CAddrInfo addr_null2 = addrman.Select();
BOOST_CHECK(addr_null2.ToString() == "[::]:0");
+
+ // Test 6.5: AddrMan::Add multiple addresses works as expected
+ std::vector<CAddress> vAddr;
+ vAddr.push_back(CAddress(ResolveService("250.1.1.3", 8333), NODE_NONE));
+ vAddr.push_back(CAddress(ResolveService("250.1.1.4", 8333), NODE_NONE));
+ BOOST_CHECK(addrman.Add(vAddr, source));
+ BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_ports)
@@ -398,9 +405,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_getaddr)
// Test 25: Ensure GetAddr still returns 23% when addrman has many addrs.
for (unsigned int i = 1; i < (8 * 256); i++) {
int octet1 = i % 256;
- int octet2 = (i / 256) % 256;
- int octet3 = (i / (256 * 2)) % 256;
- std::string strAddr = boost::to_string(octet1) + "." + boost::to_string(octet2) + "." + boost::to_string(octet3) + ".23";
+ int octet2 = i >> 8 % 256;
+ std::string strAddr = boost::to_string(octet1) + "." + boost::to_string(octet2) + ".1.23";
CAddress addr = CAddress(ResolveService(strAddr), NODE_NONE);
// Ensure that for all addrs in addrman, isTerrible == false.
@@ -412,10 +418,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addrman_getaddr)
std::vector<CAddress> vAddr = addrman.GetAddr();
size_t percent23 = (addrman.size() * 23) / 100;
- BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == percent23);
- BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == 461);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(vAddr.size(), percent23);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(vAddr.size(), 461);
// (Addrman.size() < number of addresses added) due to address collisions.
- BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2007);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(addrman.size(), 2006);
}
@@ -493,7 +499,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(caddrinfo_get_new_bucket)
uint256 nKey1 = (uint256)(CHashWriter(SER_GETHASH, 0) << 1).GetHash();
uint256 nKey2 = (uint256)(CHashWriter(SER_GETHASH, 0) << 2).GetHash();
+ // Test 29.5: Make sure the buckets are what we expect
BOOST_CHECK(info1.GetNewBucket(nKey1) == 786);
+ BOOST_CHECK(info1.GetNewBucket(nKey1, source1) == 786);
// Test 30: Make sure key actually randomizes bucket placement. A fail on
// this test could be a security issue.