aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>2015-04-08 11:20:00 -0700
committerPieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>2015-12-11 22:20:38 +0100
commit5400ef6bcb9d243b2b21697775aa6491115420f3 (patch)
treebb8bb37f0db1e2a48318f64fb42de0a95d5f997b /src/test/DoS_tests.cpp
parent9ee02cf564d1ce79d2981899cb4d38c914210dc7 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-5400ef6bcb9d243b2b21697775aa6491115420f3.tar.xz
Replace trickle nodes with per-node/message Poisson delays
We used to have a trickle node, a node which was chosen in each iteration of the send loop that was privileged and allowed to send out queued up non-time critical messages. Since the removal of the fixed sleeps in the network code, this resulted in fast and attackable treatment of such broadcasts. This pull request changes the 3 remaining trickle use cases by random delays: * Local address broadcast (while also removing the the wiping of the seen filter) * Address relay * Inv relay (for transactions; blocks are always relayed immediately) The code is based on older commits by Patrick Strateman.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/DoS_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/test/DoS_tests.cpp14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp
index da296a0461..51d296502e 100644
--- a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
CNode dummyNode1(INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, "", true);
dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); // Should get banned
- SendMessages(&dummyNode1, false);
+ SendMessages(&dummyNode1);
BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr1));
BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not banned
@@ -57,11 +57,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
CNode dummyNode2(INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, "", true);
dummyNode2.nVersion = 1;
Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50);
- SendMessages(&dummyNode2, false);
+ SendMessages(&dummyNode2);
BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(addr2)); // 2 not banned yet...
BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be
Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50);
- SendMessages(&dummyNode2, false);
+ SendMessages(&dummyNode2);
BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr2));
}
@@ -73,13 +73,13 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore)
CNode dummyNode1(INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, "", true);
dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100);
- SendMessages(&dummyNode1, false);
+ SendMessages(&dummyNode1);
BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(addr1));
Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 10);
- SendMessages(&dummyNode1, false);
+ SendMessages(&dummyNode1);
BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(addr1));
Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 1);
- SendMessages(&dummyNode1, false);
+ SendMessages(&dummyNode1);
BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr1));
mapArgs.erase("-banscore");
}
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
dummyNode.nVersion = 1;
Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), 100);
- SendMessages(&dummyNode, false);
+ SendMessages(&dummyNode);
BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr));
SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60);