diff options
author | Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> | 2015-04-08 11:20:00 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> | 2015-12-11 22:20:38 +0100 |
commit | 5400ef6bcb9d243b2b21697775aa6491115420f3 (patch) | |
tree | bb8bb37f0db1e2a48318f64fb42de0a95d5f997b /src/test/DoS_tests.cpp | |
parent | 9ee02cf564d1ce79d2981899cb4d38c914210dc7 (diff) |
Replace trickle nodes with per-node/message Poisson delays
We used to have a trickle node, a node which was chosen in each iteration of
the send loop that was privileged and allowed to send out queued up non-time
critical messages. Since the removal of the fixed sleeps in the network code,
this resulted in fast and attackable treatment of such broadcasts.
This pull request changes the 3 remaining trickle use cases by random delays:
* Local address broadcast (while also removing the the wiping of the seen filter)
* Address relay
* Inv relay (for transactions; blocks are always relayed immediately)
The code is based on older commits by Patrick Strateman.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/DoS_tests.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/DoS_tests.cpp | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp index da296a0461..51d296502e 100644 --- a/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp +++ b/src/test/DoS_tests.cpp @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) CNode dummyNode1(INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, "", true); dummyNode1.nVersion = 1; Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); // Should get banned - SendMessages(&dummyNode1, false); + SendMessages(&dummyNode1); BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr1)); BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not banned @@ -57,11 +57,11 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning) CNode dummyNode2(INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, "", true); dummyNode2.nVersion = 1; Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); - SendMessages(&dummyNode2, false); + SendMessages(&dummyNode2); BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(addr2)); // 2 not banned yet... BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50); - SendMessages(&dummyNode2, false); + SendMessages(&dummyNode2); BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr2)); } @@ -73,13 +73,13 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore) CNode dummyNode1(INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, "", true); dummyNode1.nVersion = 1; Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 100); - SendMessages(&dummyNode1, false); + SendMessages(&dummyNode1); BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(addr1)); Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 10); - SendMessages(&dummyNode1, false); + SendMessages(&dummyNode1); BOOST_CHECK(!CNode::IsBanned(addr1)); Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), 1); - SendMessages(&dummyNode1, false); + SendMessages(&dummyNode1); BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr1)); mapArgs.erase("-banscore"); } @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime) dummyNode.nVersion = 1; Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), 100); - SendMessages(&dummyNode, false); + SendMessages(&dummyNode); BOOST_CHECK(CNode::IsBanned(addr)); SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60); |