Replace NOP2 with CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY (BIP65)

<nLockTime> CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY -> <nLockTime>

Fails if tx.nLockTime < nLockTime, allowing the funds in a txout to be
locked until some block height or block time in the future is reached.

Only the logic and unittests are implemented; this commit does not have
any actual soft-fork logic in it.

Thanks to Pieter Wuille for rebase.

Credit goes to Gregory Maxwell for the suggestion of comparing the
argument against the transaction nLockTime rather than the current
time/blockheight directly.

1 files changed, 81 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/script/interpreter.cpp b/src/script/interpreter.cpp
index 84a7432fdb..0b78fdf5a8 100644
--- a/src/script/interpreter.cpp
+++ b/src/script/interpreter.cpp
@@ -335,9 +335,51 @@ bool EvalScript(vector<vector<unsigned char> >& stack, const CScript& script, un
                 // Control
                 //
                 case OP_NOP:
-                break;
+                    break;
+
+                case OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY:
+                {
+                    if (!(flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY)) {
+                        // not enabled; treat as a NOP2
+                        if (flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS) {
+                            return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS);
+                        }
+                        break;
+                    }
+
+                    if (stack.size() < 1)
+                        return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_INVALID_STACK_OPERATION);
+
+                    // Note that elsewhere numeric opcodes are limited to
+                    // operands in the range -2**31+1 to 2**31-1, however it is
+                    // legal for opcodes to produce results exceeding that
+                    // range. This limitation is implemented by CScriptNum's
+                    // default 4-byte limit.
+                    //
+                    // If we kept to that limit we'd have a year 2038 problem,
+                    // even though the nLockTime field in transactions
+                    // themselves is uint32 which only becomes meaningless
+                    // after the year 2106.
+                    //
+                    // Thus as a special case we tell CScriptNum to accept up
+                    // to 5-byte bignums, which are good until 2**39-1, well
+                    // beyond the 2**32-1 limit of the nLockTime field itself.
+                    const CScriptNum nLockTime(stacktop(-1), fRequireMinimal, 5);
+
+                    // In the rare event that the argument may be < 0 due to
+                    // some arithmetic being done first, you can always use
+                    // 0 MAX CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY.
+                    if (nLockTime < 0)
+                        return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_NEGATIVE_LOCKTIME);
+
+                    // Actually compare the specified lock time with the transaction.
+                    if (!checker.CheckLockTime(nLockTime))
+                        return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_UNSATISFIED_LOCKTIME);
+
+                    break;
+                }
 
-                case OP_NOP1: case OP_NOP2: case OP_NOP3: case OP_NOP4: case OP_NOP5:
+                case OP_NOP1: case OP_NOP3: case OP_NOP4: case OP_NOP5:
                 case OP_NOP6: case OP_NOP7: case OP_NOP8: case OP_NOP9: case OP_NOP10:
                 {
                     if (flags & SCRIPT_VERIFY_DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS)
@@ -1084,6 +1126,43 @@ bool TransactionSignatureChecker::CheckSig(const vector<unsigned char>& vchSigIn
     return true;
 }
 
+bool TransactionSignatureChecker::CheckLockTime(const CScriptNum& nLockTime) const
+{
+    // There are two times of nLockTime: lock-by-blockheight
+    // and lock-by-blocktime, distinguished by whether
+    // nLockTime < LOCKTIME_THRESHOLD.
+    //
+    // We want to compare apples to apples, so fail the script
+    // unless the type of nLockTime being tested is the same as
+    // the nLockTime in the transaction.
+    if (!(
+        (txTo->nLockTime <  LOCKTIME_THRESHOLD && nLockTime <  LOCKTIME_THRESHOLD) ||
+        (txTo->nLockTime >= LOCKTIME_THRESHOLD && nLockTime >= LOCKTIME_THRESHOLD)
+    ))
+        return false;
+
+    // Now that we know we're comparing apples-to-apples, the
+    // comparison is a simple numeric one.
+    if (nLockTime > (int64_t)txTo->nLockTime)
+        return false;
+
+    // Finally the nLockTime feature can be disabled and thus
+    // CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY bypassed if every txin has been
+    // finalized by setting nSequence to maxint. The
+    // transaction would be allowed into the blockchain, making
+    // the opcode ineffective.
+    //
+    // Testing if this vin is not final is sufficient to
+    // prevent this condition. Alternatively we could test all
+    // inputs, but testing just this input minimizes the data
+    // required to prove correct CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY execution.
+    if (txTo->vin[nIn].IsFinal())
+        return false;
+
+    return true;
+}
+
+
 bool VerifyScript(const CScript& scriptSig, const CScript& scriptPubKey, unsigned int flags, const BaseSignatureChecker& checker, ScriptError* serror)
 {
     set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_UNKNOWN_ERROR);