diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2019-10-28 11:56:43 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2019-10-28 12:00:36 +0100 |
commit | 9ae468a6d5250c6d55b4879834179ceec1ecc180 (patch) | |
tree | fab39001507bbcc8a22943dbb54476e4dc8c3702 /src/rpc | |
parent | be50469217bd775c4305938634c32e5932f47841 (diff) | |
parent | faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839 (diff) |
Merge #17192: util: Add CHECK_NONFATAL and use it in src/rpc
faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839 util: Add CHECK_NONFATAL and use it in src/rpc (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes #17181
Currently, we use `assert` in RPC code to document logic and code assumptions. However, it seems a bit extreme to abort all of Bitcoin Core on an assert failure in one of the RPC threads. I suggest to replace all `assert`s with a macro `CHECK_NONFATAL(condition)` that throws a runtime error when the condition evaluates to `false`. That runtime error will then be returned to the rpc caller and will include instructions to report the error to our issue tracker.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839
laanwj:
ACK faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839
Tree-SHA512: 9b748715a5e0767ac11f1324a95a3a6ec672a0e0658013492219223bda83ce4b1b447fd8183bbb235f7df5ef7dddda7666ad569544b4d61cc65f232ca7a800ec
Diffstat (limited to 'src/rpc')
-rw-r--r-- | src/rpc/blockchain.cpp | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/rpc/misc.cpp | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/rpc/util.h | 13 |
3 files changed, 14 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp b/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp index 4bbd4aaf64..fac6bcd60d 100644 --- a/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp +++ b/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ #include <chain.h> #include <chainparams.h> #include <coins.h> -#include <node/coinstats.h> #include <consensus/validation.h> #include <core_io.h> #include <hash.h> #include <index/blockfilterindex.h> +#include <node/coinstats.h> #include <policy/feerate.h> #include <policy/policy.h> #include <policy/rbf.h> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ #include <validationinterface.h> #include <warnings.h> -#include <assert.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <univalue.h> diff --git a/src/rpc/misc.cpp b/src/rpc/misc.cpp index d289274a37..d73dd6e52d 100644 --- a/src/rpc/misc.cpp +++ b/src/rpc/misc.cpp @@ -3,15 +3,16 @@ // Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying // file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. -#include <key_io.h> #include <httpserver.h> +#include <key_io.h> #include <outputtype.h> #include <rpc/blockchain.h> #include <rpc/server.h> #include <rpc/util.h> #include <script/descriptor.h> -#include <util/system.h> +#include <util/check.h> #include <util/strencodings.h> +#include <util/system.h> #include <util/validation.h> #include <stdint.h> @@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ static UniValue echo(const JSONRPCRequest& request) throw std::runtime_error( RPCHelpMan{"echo|echojson ...", "\nSimply echo back the input arguments. This command is for testing.\n" + "\nIt will return an internal bug report when exactly 100 arguments are passed.\n" "\nThe difference between echo and echojson is that echojson has argument conversion enabled in the client-side table in " "bitcoin-cli and the GUI. There is no server-side difference.", {}, @@ -548,6 +550,8 @@ static UniValue echo(const JSONRPCRequest& request) }.ToString() ); + CHECK_NONFATAL(request.params.size() != 100); + return request.params; } diff --git a/src/rpc/util.h b/src/rpc/util.h index 72fc7b6286..ec36956c95 100644 --- a/src/rpc/util.h +++ b/src/rpc/util.h @@ -7,14 +7,15 @@ #include <node/transaction.h> #include <outputtype.h> -#include <pubkey.h> #include <protocol.h> +#include <pubkey.h> #include <rpc/protocol.h> #include <rpc/request.h> #include <script/script.h> #include <script/sign.h> #include <script/standard.h> #include <univalue.h> +#include <util/check.h> #include <string> #include <vector> @@ -146,7 +147,7 @@ struct RPCArg { m_oneline_description{oneline_description}, m_type_str{type_str} { - assert(type != Type::ARR && type != Type::OBJ); + CHECK_NONFATAL(type != Type::ARR && type != Type::OBJ); } RPCArg( @@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ struct RPCArg { m_oneline_description{oneline_description}, m_type_str{type_str} { - assert(type == Type::ARR || type == Type::OBJ); + CHECK_NONFATAL(type == Type::ARR || type == Type::OBJ); } bool IsOptional() const; @@ -194,14 +195,14 @@ struct RPCResult { explicit RPCResult(std::string result) : m_cond{}, m_result{std::move(result)} { - assert(!m_result.empty()); + CHECK_NONFATAL(!m_result.empty()); } RPCResult(std::string cond, std::string result) : m_cond{std::move(cond)}, m_result{std::move(result)} { - assert(!m_cond.empty()); - assert(!m_result.empty()); + CHECK_NONFATAL(!m_cond.empty()); + CHECK_NONFATAL(!m_result.empty()); } }; |