aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/rpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2019-10-28 11:56:43 +0100
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2019-10-28 12:00:36 +0100
commit9ae468a6d5250c6d55b4879834179ceec1ecc180 (patch)
treefab39001507bbcc8a22943dbb54476e4dc8c3702 /src/rpc
parentbe50469217bd775c4305938634c32e5932f47841 (diff)
parentfaeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839 (diff)
Merge #17192: util: Add CHECK_NONFATAL and use it in src/rpc
faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839 util: Add CHECK_NONFATAL and use it in src/rpc (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Fixes #17181 Currently, we use `assert` in RPC code to document logic and code assumptions. However, it seems a bit extreme to abort all of Bitcoin Core on an assert failure in one of the RPC threads. I suggest to replace all `assert`s with a macro `CHECK_NONFATAL(condition)` that throws a runtime error when the condition evaluates to `false`. That runtime error will then be returned to the rpc caller and will include instructions to report the error to our issue tracker. ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: ACK faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839 laanwj: ACK faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839 ryanofsky: Code review ACK faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839 Tree-SHA512: 9b748715a5e0767ac11f1324a95a3a6ec672a0e0658013492219223bda83ce4b1b447fd8183bbb235f7df5ef7dddda7666ad569544b4d61cc65f232ca7a800ec
Diffstat (limited to 'src/rpc')
-rw-r--r--src/rpc/blockchain.cpp3
-rw-r--r--src/rpc/misc.cpp8
-rw-r--r--src/rpc/util.h13
3 files changed, 14 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp b/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp
index 4bbd4aaf64..fac6bcd60d 100644
--- a/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp
+++ b/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@
#include <chain.h>
#include <chainparams.h>
#include <coins.h>
-#include <node/coinstats.h>
#include <consensus/validation.h>
#include <core_io.h>
#include <hash.h>
#include <index/blockfilterindex.h>
+#include <node/coinstats.h>
#include <policy/feerate.h>
#include <policy/policy.h>
#include <policy/rbf.h>
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
#include <validationinterface.h>
#include <warnings.h>
-#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <univalue.h>
diff --git a/src/rpc/misc.cpp b/src/rpc/misc.cpp
index d289274a37..d73dd6e52d 100644
--- a/src/rpc/misc.cpp
+++ b/src/rpc/misc.cpp
@@ -3,15 +3,16 @@
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
-#include <key_io.h>
#include <httpserver.h>
+#include <key_io.h>
#include <outputtype.h>
#include <rpc/blockchain.h>
#include <rpc/server.h>
#include <rpc/util.h>
#include <script/descriptor.h>
-#include <util/system.h>
+#include <util/check.h>
#include <util/strencodings.h>
+#include <util/system.h>
#include <util/validation.h>
#include <stdint.h>
@@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ static UniValue echo(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
throw std::runtime_error(
RPCHelpMan{"echo|echojson ...",
"\nSimply echo back the input arguments. This command is for testing.\n"
+ "\nIt will return an internal bug report when exactly 100 arguments are passed.\n"
"\nThe difference between echo and echojson is that echojson has argument conversion enabled in the client-side table in "
"bitcoin-cli and the GUI. There is no server-side difference.",
{},
@@ -548,6 +550,8 @@ static UniValue echo(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
}.ToString()
);
+ CHECK_NONFATAL(request.params.size() != 100);
+
return request.params;
}
diff --git a/src/rpc/util.h b/src/rpc/util.h
index 72fc7b6286..ec36956c95 100644
--- a/src/rpc/util.h
+++ b/src/rpc/util.h
@@ -7,14 +7,15 @@
#include <node/transaction.h>
#include <outputtype.h>
-#include <pubkey.h>
#include <protocol.h>
+#include <pubkey.h>
#include <rpc/protocol.h>
#include <rpc/request.h>
#include <script/script.h>
#include <script/sign.h>
#include <script/standard.h>
#include <univalue.h>
+#include <util/check.h>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
@@ -146,7 +147,7 @@ struct RPCArg {
m_oneline_description{oneline_description},
m_type_str{type_str}
{
- assert(type != Type::ARR && type != Type::OBJ);
+ CHECK_NONFATAL(type != Type::ARR && type != Type::OBJ);
}
RPCArg(
@@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ struct RPCArg {
m_oneline_description{oneline_description},
m_type_str{type_str}
{
- assert(type == Type::ARR || type == Type::OBJ);
+ CHECK_NONFATAL(type == Type::ARR || type == Type::OBJ);
}
bool IsOptional() const;
@@ -194,14 +195,14 @@ struct RPCResult {
explicit RPCResult(std::string result)
: m_cond{}, m_result{std::move(result)}
{
- assert(!m_result.empty());
+ CHECK_NONFATAL(!m_result.empty());
}
RPCResult(std::string cond, std::string result)
: m_cond{std::move(cond)}, m_result{std::move(result)}
{
- assert(!m_cond.empty());
- assert(!m_result.empty());
+ CHECK_NONFATAL(!m_cond.empty());
+ CHECK_NONFATAL(!m_result.empty());
}
};