aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/rpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>2018-06-19 09:25:05 +0200
committerJonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>2018-06-19 09:25:17 +0200
commit3f398d7a17f136cd4a67998406ca41a124ae2966 (patch)
tree01184f0098e17057498754d7854e8cd5987b8727 /src/rpc
parent088240685456494a26047c8f3d5ecf578f70dbce (diff)
parentf74894480db5dfbf49534499f489357ee9984183 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-3f398d7a17f136cd4a67998406ca41a124ae2966.tar.xz
Merge #13439: rpc: Avoid "duplicate" return value for invalid submitblock
f74894480 Only set fNewBlock to true in AcceptBlock when we write to disk (Matt Corallo) fa6e49731 rpc: Avoid "duplicate" return value for invalid submitblock (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This is #13395 with one more commit tacked on. MarcoFalke got tired of dealing with the stupidity of fixing a return code with too many rounds of review (not that I blame him). Honestly we should probably have no return whatsoever, but for now, this fixes it (as well as nLastBlockTime for eviction purposes). Original description: When `submitblock` of an invalid block, the return value should not be `"duplicate"`. This is only seen when the header was previously found (denoted by the incorrectly named boolean `fBlockPresent`). Fix this bug by removing `fBlockPresent`. Tree-SHA512: 0ce3092655d5d904b4c8c5ff7479f73ce387144a738f20472b8af132564005c6db5594ae366e589508f6258506ee7a28b1c7995a83a8328b334f99316006bf2d
Diffstat (limited to 'src/rpc')
-rw-r--r--src/rpc/mining.cpp13
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/rpc/mining.cpp b/src/rpc/mining.cpp
index 85b864e6b9..81c4fb040f 100644
--- a/src/rpc/mining.cpp
+++ b/src/rpc/mining.cpp
@@ -725,7 +725,6 @@ static UniValue submitblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
}
uint256 hash = block.GetHash();
- bool fBlockPresent = false;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
const CBlockIndex* pindex = LookupBlockIndex(hash);
@@ -736,8 +735,6 @@ static UniValue submitblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
if (pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) {
return "duplicate-invalid";
}
- // Otherwise, we might only have the header - process the block before returning
- fBlockPresent = true;
}
}
@@ -749,13 +746,15 @@ static UniValue submitblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
}
}
+ bool new_block;
submitblock_StateCatcher sc(block.GetHash());
RegisterValidationInterface(&sc);
- bool fAccepted = ProcessNewBlock(Params(), blockptr, true, nullptr);
+ bool accepted = ProcessNewBlock(Params(), blockptr, /* fForceProcessing */ true, /* fNewBlock */ &new_block);
UnregisterValidationInterface(&sc);
- if (fBlockPresent) {
- if (fAccepted && !sc.found) {
- return "duplicate-inconclusive";
+ if (!new_block) {
+ if (!accepted) {
+ // TODO Maybe pass down fNewBlock to AcceptBlockHeader, so it is properly set to true in this case?
+ return "invalid";
}
return "duplicate";
}