aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/rpc/server.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-03-13 17:58:52 +0100
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-03-13 18:00:06 +0100
commit702e8b70bd870f506ce8157e58b77cb7d0a0f98d (patch)
tree089aad138eced3caaf758d325214c28d1b83cc35 /src/rpc/server.cpp
parent0f0229d0c36310eea329716fbc81541c7c3a62b1 (diff)
parentfac70134a9e3a1fc8e491aecb3c36d0184ba7b82 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-702e8b70bd870f506ce8157e58b77cb7d0a0f98d.tar.xz
Merge #11872: [rpc] createrawtransaction: Accept sorted outputs
fac70134a rpc: Update createrawtransaction examples (MarcoFalke) fa06dfce0 [rpc] createrawtransaction: Accept sorted outputs (MarcoFalke) 8acd25d85 rpc: Allow typeAny in RPCTypeCheck (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: The second parameter of the `createrawtransaction` is a dictionary of the outputs. This comes with at least two drawbacks: * In case of duplicate keys, either of them might silently disappear, with no user feedback at all. A user needs to make other mistakes, but this could eventually lead to abnormal tx fees. * A dictionary does not guarantee that keys are sorted. Again, a user needs to keep this in mind, as it could eventually lead to excessive tx fees. Even though my scenario of loss-of-funds is unlikely to happen, I see it as a inconvenience that should be fixed. Tree-SHA512: cd562f34f7f9f79c7d3433805971325c388c2035611be283980f4049066a622df4f0afdc11d7ac96662260ec0115147cb65e1ab5268f5a1b063242f3fe425f77
Diffstat (limited to 'src/rpc/server.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/rpc/server.cpp11
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/src/rpc/server.cpp b/src/rpc/server.cpp
index 35401bf876..54995ef000 100644
--- a/src/rpc/server.cpp
+++ b/src/rpc/server.cpp
@@ -50,12 +50,11 @@ void RPCServer::OnStopped(std::function<void ()> slot)
}
void RPCTypeCheck(const UniValue& params,
- const std::list<UniValue::VType>& typesExpected,
+ const std::list<UniValueType>& typesExpected,
bool fAllowNull)
{
unsigned int i = 0;
- for (UniValue::VType t : typesExpected)
- {
+ for (const UniValueType& t : typesExpected) {
if (params.size() <= i)
break;
@@ -67,10 +66,10 @@ void RPCTypeCheck(const UniValue& params,
}
}
-void RPCTypeCheckArgument(const UniValue& value, UniValue::VType typeExpected)
+void RPCTypeCheckArgument(const UniValue& value, const UniValueType& typeExpected)
{
- if (value.type() != typeExpected) {
- throw JSONRPCError(RPC_TYPE_ERROR, strprintf("Expected type %s, got %s", uvTypeName(typeExpected), uvTypeName(value.type())));
+ if (!typeExpected.typeAny && value.type() != typeExpected.type) {
+ throw JSONRPCError(RPC_TYPE_ERROR, strprintf("Expected type %s, got %s", uvTypeName(typeExpected.type), uvTypeName(value.type())));
}
}