diff options
author | Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch> | 2018-06-19 09:25:05 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch> | 2018-06-19 09:25:17 +0200 |
commit | 3f398d7a17f136cd4a67998406ca41a124ae2966 (patch) | |
tree | 01184f0098e17057498754d7854e8cd5987b8727 /src/rpc/mining.cpp | |
parent | 088240685456494a26047c8f3d5ecf578f70dbce (diff) | |
parent | f74894480db5dfbf49534499f489357ee9984183 (diff) |
Merge #13439: rpc: Avoid "duplicate" return value for invalid submitblock
f74894480 Only set fNewBlock to true in AcceptBlock when we write to disk (Matt Corallo)
fa6e49731 rpc: Avoid "duplicate" return value for invalid submitblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is #13395 with one more commit tacked on. MarcoFalke got tired of dealing with the stupidity of fixing a return code with too many rounds of review (not that I blame him). Honestly we should probably have no return whatsoever, but for now, this fixes it (as well as nLastBlockTime for eviction purposes).
Original description:
When `submitblock` of an invalid block, the return value should not be `"duplicate"`.
This is only seen when the header was previously found (denoted by the incorrectly named boolean `fBlockPresent`). Fix this bug by removing `fBlockPresent`.
Tree-SHA512: 0ce3092655d5d904b4c8c5ff7479f73ce387144a738f20472b8af132564005c6db5594ae366e589508f6258506ee7a28b1c7995a83a8328b334f99316006bf2d
Diffstat (limited to 'src/rpc/mining.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/rpc/mining.cpp | 13 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/rpc/mining.cpp b/src/rpc/mining.cpp index 85b864e6b9..81c4fb040f 100644 --- a/src/rpc/mining.cpp +++ b/src/rpc/mining.cpp @@ -725,7 +725,6 @@ static UniValue submitblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request) } uint256 hash = block.GetHash(); - bool fBlockPresent = false; { LOCK(cs_main); const CBlockIndex* pindex = LookupBlockIndex(hash); @@ -736,8 +735,6 @@ static UniValue submitblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request) if (pindex->nStatus & BLOCK_FAILED_MASK) { return "duplicate-invalid"; } - // Otherwise, we might only have the header - process the block before returning - fBlockPresent = true; } } @@ -749,13 +746,15 @@ static UniValue submitblock(const JSONRPCRequest& request) } } + bool new_block; submitblock_StateCatcher sc(block.GetHash()); RegisterValidationInterface(&sc); - bool fAccepted = ProcessNewBlock(Params(), blockptr, true, nullptr); + bool accepted = ProcessNewBlock(Params(), blockptr, /* fForceProcessing */ true, /* fNewBlock */ &new_block); UnregisterValidationInterface(&sc); - if (fBlockPresent) { - if (fAccepted && !sc.found) { - return "duplicate-inconclusive"; + if (!new_block) { + if (!accepted) { + // TODO Maybe pass down fNewBlock to AcceptBlockHeader, so it is properly set to true in this case? + return "invalid"; } return "duplicate"; } |