diff options
| author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2019-10-28 11:56:43 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2019-10-28 12:00:36 +0100 |
| commit | 9ae468a6d5250c6d55b4879834179ceec1ecc180 (patch) | |
| tree | fab39001507bbcc8a22943dbb54476e4dc8c3702 /src/policy | |
| parent | be50469217bd775c4305938634c32e5932f47841 (diff) | |
| parent | faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839 (diff) | |
Merge #17192: util: Add CHECK_NONFATAL and use it in src/rpc
faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839 util: Add CHECK_NONFATAL and use it in src/rpc (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes #17181
Currently, we use `assert` in RPC code to document logic and code assumptions. However, it seems a bit extreme to abort all of Bitcoin Core on an assert failure in one of the RPC threads. I suggest to replace all `assert`s with a macro `CHECK_NONFATAL(condition)` that throws a runtime error when the condition evaluates to `false`. That runtime error will then be returned to the rpc caller and will include instructions to report the error to our issue tracker.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839
laanwj:
ACK faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faeb6665362e35f573ad715ade0ef2db62d71839
Tree-SHA512: 9b748715a5e0767ac11f1324a95a3a6ec672a0e0658013492219223bda83ce4b1b447fd8183bbb235f7df5ef7dddda7666ad569544b4d61cc65f232ca7a800ec
Diffstat (limited to 'src/policy')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions