aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/policy/policy.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-03-27 16:28:27 +0200
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2018-03-27 16:38:14 +0200
commit3de01268b7048a9c85f31dc6d21d44b727e860a5 (patch)
tree5972c90f51e19778073294ce7b6b7d2ab98ff0b5 /src/policy/policy.cpp
parent68484d64fd79f3ef7b32d0785fc94f97eb87c60b (diff)
parent1f45e2164a7674f716b425a6658c41ca7c30265b (diff)
downloadbitcoin-3de01268b7048a9c85f31dc6d21d44b727e860a5.tar.xz
Merge #10742: scripted-diff: Use scoped enumerations (C++11, "enum class")
1f45e21 scripted-diff: Convert 11 enums into scoped enums (C++11) (practicalswift) Pull request description: Rationale (from Bjarne Stroustrup's ["C++11 FAQ"](http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#enum)): > > The enum classes ("new enums", "strong enums") address three problems with traditional C++ enumerations: > > * conventional enums implicitly convert to int, causing errors when someone does not want an enumeration to act as an integer. > * conventional enums export their enumerators to the surrounding scope, causing name clashes. > * the underlying type of an enum cannot be specified, causing confusion, compatibility problems, and makes forward declaration impossible. > > The new enums are "enum class" because they combine aspects of traditional enumerations (names values) with aspects of classes (scoped members and absence of conversions). Tree-SHA512: 9656e1cf4c3cabd4378c7a38d0c2eaf79e4a54d204a3c5762330840e55ee7e141e188a3efb2b4daf0ef3110bbaff80d8b9253abf2a9b015cdc4d60b49ac2b914
Diffstat (limited to 'src/policy/policy.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/policy/policy.cpp4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/policy/policy.cpp b/src/policy/policy.cpp
index db1ad4f26d..c3f65fb2ab 100644
--- a/src/policy/policy.cpp
+++ b/src/policy/policy.cpp
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ bool AreInputsStandard(const CTransaction& tx, const CCoinsViewCache& mapInputs)
{
std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> > stack;
// convert the scriptSig into a stack, so we can inspect the redeemScript
- if (!EvalScript(stack, tx.vin[i].scriptSig, SCRIPT_VERIFY_NONE, BaseSignatureChecker(), SIGVERSION_BASE))
+ if (!EvalScript(stack, tx.vin[i].scriptSig, SCRIPT_VERIFY_NONE, BaseSignatureChecker(), SigVersion::BASE))
return false;
if (stack.empty())
return false;
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ bool IsWitnessStandard(const CTransaction& tx, const CCoinsViewCache& mapInputs)
// If the scriptPubKey is P2SH, we try to extract the redeemScript casually by converting the scriptSig
// into a stack. We do not check IsPushOnly nor compare the hash as these will be done later anyway.
// If the check fails at this stage, we know that this txid must be a bad one.
- if (!EvalScript(stack, tx.vin[i].scriptSig, SCRIPT_VERIFY_NONE, BaseSignatureChecker(), SIGVERSION_BASE))
+ if (!EvalScript(stack, tx.vin[i].scriptSig, SCRIPT_VERIFY_NONE, BaseSignatureChecker(), SigVersion::BASE))
return false;
if (stack.empty())
return false;