diff options
author | Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> | 2022-07-18 14:27:49 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com> | 2022-07-18 14:39:55 -0400 |
commit | 8d4a058ac421da838422da127aac71abf83a49f6 (patch) | |
tree | b54dac317ea8eadec98e8c8c5276998a2aa43346 /src/node/interfaces.cpp | |
parent | 4aaa3b52006efa1049c238f638b6d87668125cbb (diff) | |
parent | 817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411 (diff) |
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23997: wallet: avoid rescans under assumed-valid blocks
817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411 wallet: avoid rescans if under the snapshot (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Refuse to load a wallet if it requires a rescan lower than the height of assumed-valid blocks.
Of course in live code right now, `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID` block index entries don't exist since they're a unique flag introduced by the use of UTXO snapshots, so this is prophylactic code exercised only by unittests.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411. This seems like the simplest change we can make to avoid wallet problems when an assumeutxo snapshot is loaded.
Tree-SHA512: cfa44b2eb33d1818d30df45210d0dde1e9b78cc9b7c88cb985054dc28427bba9e0905debe4196065d1d3a5ce7bca7e605e629d5ce5f0225b25395746e6d3d596
Diffstat (limited to 'src/node/interfaces.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/node/interfaces.cpp | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/node/interfaces.cpp b/src/node/interfaces.cpp index 93aa9e526b..46e0efb9b6 100644 --- a/src/node/interfaces.cpp +++ b/src/node/interfaces.cpp @@ -775,6 +775,11 @@ public: notifications.transactionAddedToMempool(entry.GetSharedTx(), 0 /* mempool_sequence */); } } + bool hasAssumedValidChain() override + { + return Assert(m_node.chainman)->IsSnapshotActive(); + } + NodeContext& m_node; }; } // namespace |