diff options
author | Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com> | 2020-02-07 04:30:41 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com> | 2020-07-19 02:10:42 -0400 |
commit | 4eb515574e1012bc8ea5dafc3042dcdf4c766f26 (patch) | |
tree | 831030efbac957e854bc017702ab50890025a79c /src/net_processing.cpp | |
parent | 97141ca442daea8fc9c307cf81a02b38dcc28fd8 (diff) |
Make TX_WITNESS_STRIPPED its own rejection reason
Previously, TX_WITNESS_MUTATED could be returned during transaction validation
for either transactions that had a witness that was non-standard, or for
transactions that had no witness but were invalid due to segwit validation
rules.
However, for txid/wtxid-relay considerations, net_processing distinguishes the
witness stripped case separately, because it affects whether a wtxid should be
able to be added to the reject filter. It is safe to add the wtxid of a
witness-mutated transaction to the filter (as that wtxid shouldn't collide with
the txid, and hence it wouldn't interfere with transaction relay from
txid-relay peers), but it is not safe to add the wtxid (== txid) of a
witness-stripped transaction to the filter, because that would interfere with
relay of another transaction with the same txid (but different wtxid) when
relaying from txid-relay peers.
Also updates the comment explaining this logic, and explaining that we can get
rid of this complexity once there's a sufficient deployment of wtxid-relaying
peers on the network.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/net_processing.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/net_processing.cpp | 35 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp index bc09e94094..d2ac86ea49 100644 --- a/src/net_processing.cpp +++ b/src/net_processing.cpp @@ -1160,6 +1160,7 @@ static bool MaybePunishNodeForTx(NodeId nodeid, const TxValidationState& state, case TxValidationResult::TX_MISSING_INPUTS: case TxValidationResult::TX_PREMATURE_SPEND: case TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED: + case TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_STRIPPED: case TxValidationResult::TX_CONFLICT: case TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY: break; @@ -2031,10 +2032,19 @@ void static ProcessOrphanTx(CConnman& connman, CTxMemPool& mempool, std::set<uin // Has inputs but not accepted to mempool // Probably non-standard or insufficient fee LogPrint(BCLog::MEMPOOL, " removed orphan tx %s\n", orphanHash.ToString()); - if (orphanTx.HasWitness() || orphan_state.GetResult() != TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED) { - // Do not use rejection cache for witness transactions or - // witness-stripped transactions, as they can have been malleated. - // See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8279 for details. + if (orphan_state.GetResult() != TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_STRIPPED) { + // Do not add txids of witness transactions or witness-stripped + // transactions to the filter, as they can have been malleated; + // adding such txids to the reject filter would potentially + // interfere with relay of valid transactions from peers that + // do not support wtxid-based relay. See + // https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8279 for details. + // We can remove this restriction (and always add wtxids to + // the filter even for witness stripped transactions) once + // wtxid-based relay is broadly deployed. + // See also comments in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r443419034 + // for concerns around weakening security of unupgraded nodes + // if we start doing this too early. assert(recentRejects); recentRejects->insert(orphanTx.GetWitnessHash()); } @@ -2992,10 +3002,19 @@ void ProcessMessage( recentRejects->insert(tx.GetWitnessHash()); } } else { - if (tx.HasWitness() || state.GetResult() != TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED) { - // Do not use rejection cache for witness transactions or - // witness-stripped transactions, as they can have been malleated. - // See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8279 for details. + if (state.GetResult() != TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_STRIPPED) { + // Do not add txids of witness transactions or witness-stripped + // transactions to the filter, as they can have been malleated; + // adding such txids to the reject filter would potentially + // interfere with relay of valid transactions from peers that + // do not support wtxid-based relay. See + // https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8279 for details. + // We can remove this restriction (and always add wtxids to + // the filter even for witness stripped transactions) once + // wtxid-based relay is broadly deployed. + // See also comments in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044#discussion_r443419034 + // for concerns around weakening security of unupgraded nodes + // if we start doing this too early. assert(recentRejects); recentRejects->insert(tx.GetWitnessHash()); if (RecursiveDynamicUsage(*ptx) < 100000) { |