aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/net_processing.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2019-10-24 10:43:02 +0200
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2019-10-24 10:49:45 +0200
commitb688b859dbb2b5af2e9d19cae9dce3e3e14bd2c1 (patch)
tree9ac818ce528058373d7fbe16ba5803fc09cbb556 /src/net_processing.cpp
parent8a191148db3f01f2a345fa2db6bc26d4d88e0e3b (diff)
parent9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82 (diff)
Merge #17004: validation: Remove REJECT code from CValidationState
9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery) 04a2f326ec0f06fb4fce1c4f93500752f05dede8 [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery) e9d5a59e34ff2d538d8f5315efd9908bf24d0fdc [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery) 0053e16714323c1694c834fdca74f064a1a33529 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery) a1a07cfe99fc8cee30ba5976dc36b47b1f6532ab [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery) Pull request description: We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set a REJECT code in the CValidationState object. Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`, then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it wasn't previously: - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`. - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`. Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in ATMP. This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579ba8cc7b684105c6a08263992b08d52. ACKs for top commit: ariard: ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits fjahr: ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments. ryanofsky: Code review ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
Diffstat (limited to 'src/net_processing.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/net_processing.cpp25
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index 43de12649e..f173af0fa1 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ namespace {
int nSyncStarted GUARDED_BY(cs_main) = 0;
/**
- * Sources of received blocks, saved to be able to send them reject
- * messages or ban them when processing happens afterwards.
+ * Sources of received blocks, saved to be able punish them when processing
+ * happens afterwards.
* Set mapBlockSource[hash].second to false if the node should not be
* punished if the block is invalid.
*/
@@ -1233,11 +1233,12 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked(const CBlock& block, const CValidationSta
const uint256 hash(block.GetHash());
std::map<uint256, std::pair<NodeId, bool>>::iterator it = mapBlockSource.find(hash);
- if (state.IsInvalid()) {
- // Don't send reject message with code 0 or an internal reject code.
- if (it != mapBlockSource.end() && State(it->second.first) && state.GetRejectCode() > 0 && state.GetRejectCode() < REJECT_INTERNAL) {
+ // If the block failed validation, we know where it came from and we're still connected
+ // to that peer, maybe punish.
+ if (state.IsInvalid() &&
+ it != mapBlockSource.end() &&
+ State(it->second.first)) {
MaybePunishNode(/*nodeid=*/ it->second.first, state, /*via_compact_block=*/ !it->second.second);
- }
}
// Check that:
// 1. The block is valid
@@ -2859,11 +2860,12 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr
// been run). This is handled below, so just treat this as
// though the block was successfully read, and rely on the
// handling in ProcessNewBlock to ensure the block index is
- // updated, reject messages go out, etc.
+ // updated, etc.
MarkBlockAsReceived(resp.blockhash); // it is now an empty pointer
fBlockRead = true;
- // mapBlockSource is only used for sending reject messages and DoS scores,
- // so the race between here and cs_main in ProcessNewBlock is fine.
+ // mapBlockSource is used for potentially punishing peers and
+ // updating which peers send us compact blocks, so the race
+ // between here and cs_main in ProcessNewBlock is fine.
// BIP 152 permits peers to relay compact blocks after validating
// the header only; we should not punish peers if the block turns
// out to be invalid.
@@ -2935,8 +2937,9 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr
// Also always process if we requested the block explicitly, as we may
// need it even though it is not a candidate for a new best tip.
forceProcessing |= MarkBlockAsReceived(hash);
- // mapBlockSource is only used for sending reject messages and DoS scores,
- // so the race between here and cs_main in ProcessNewBlock is fine.
+ // mapBlockSource is only used for punishing peers and setting
+ // which peers send us compact blocks, so the race between here and
+ // cs_main in ProcessNewBlock is fine.
mapBlockSource.emplace(hash, std::make_pair(pfrom->GetId(), true));
}
bool fNewBlock = false;