diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2019-10-24 10:43:02 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2019-10-24 10:49:45 +0200 |
commit | b688b859dbb2b5af2e9d19cae9dce3e3e14bd2c1 (patch) | |
tree | 9ac818ce528058373d7fbe16ba5803fc09cbb556 /src/net_processing.cpp | |
parent | 8a191148db3f01f2a345fa2db6bc26d4d88e0e3b (diff) | |
parent | 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82 (diff) |
Merge #17004: validation: Remove REJECT code from CValidationState
9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery)
04a2f326ec0f06fb4fce1c4f93500752f05dede8 [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery)
e9d5a59e34ff2d538d8f5315efd9908bf24d0fdc [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery)
0053e16714323c1694c834fdca74f064a1a33529 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery)
a1a07cfe99fc8cee30ba5976dc36b47b1f6532ab [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set
a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.
Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the
call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only
previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`,
then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it
wasn't previously:
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`.
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`.
Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The
only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in
ATMP.
This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579ba8cc7b684105c6a08263992b08d52.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits
fjahr:
ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments
Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
Diffstat (limited to 'src/net_processing.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/net_processing.cpp | 25 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp index 43de12649e..f173af0fa1 100644 --- a/src/net_processing.cpp +++ b/src/net_processing.cpp @@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ namespace { int nSyncStarted GUARDED_BY(cs_main) = 0; /** - * Sources of received blocks, saved to be able to send them reject - * messages or ban them when processing happens afterwards. + * Sources of received blocks, saved to be able punish them when processing + * happens afterwards. * Set mapBlockSource[hash].second to false if the node should not be * punished if the block is invalid. */ @@ -1233,11 +1233,12 @@ void PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked(const CBlock& block, const CValidationSta const uint256 hash(block.GetHash()); std::map<uint256, std::pair<NodeId, bool>>::iterator it = mapBlockSource.find(hash); - if (state.IsInvalid()) { - // Don't send reject message with code 0 or an internal reject code. - if (it != mapBlockSource.end() && State(it->second.first) && state.GetRejectCode() > 0 && state.GetRejectCode() < REJECT_INTERNAL) { + // If the block failed validation, we know where it came from and we're still connected + // to that peer, maybe punish. + if (state.IsInvalid() && + it != mapBlockSource.end() && + State(it->second.first)) { MaybePunishNode(/*nodeid=*/ it->second.first, state, /*via_compact_block=*/ !it->second.second); - } } // Check that: // 1. The block is valid @@ -2859,11 +2860,12 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr // been run). This is handled below, so just treat this as // though the block was successfully read, and rely on the // handling in ProcessNewBlock to ensure the block index is - // updated, reject messages go out, etc. + // updated, etc. MarkBlockAsReceived(resp.blockhash); // it is now an empty pointer fBlockRead = true; - // mapBlockSource is only used for sending reject messages and DoS scores, - // so the race between here and cs_main in ProcessNewBlock is fine. + // mapBlockSource is used for potentially punishing peers and + // updating which peers send us compact blocks, so the race + // between here and cs_main in ProcessNewBlock is fine. // BIP 152 permits peers to relay compact blocks after validating // the header only; we should not punish peers if the block turns // out to be invalid. @@ -2935,8 +2937,9 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& strCommand, CDataStr // Also always process if we requested the block explicitly, as we may // need it even though it is not a candidate for a new best tip. forceProcessing |= MarkBlockAsReceived(hash); - // mapBlockSource is only used for sending reject messages and DoS scores, - // so the race between here and cs_main in ProcessNewBlock is fine. + // mapBlockSource is only used for punishing peers and setting + // which peers send us compact blocks, so the race between here and + // cs_main in ProcessNewBlock is fine. mapBlockSource.emplace(hash, std::make_pair(pfrom->GetId(), true)); } bool fNewBlock = false; |