aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/net_processing.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2020-10-02 16:36:57 +0200
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2020-10-02 16:42:38 +0200
commit597488d37c9c358837616516d88f861f5c25f827 (patch)
tree8200b3675c5ffde1607e860a984e579b855fd8cb /src/net_processing.cpp
parentdf2129a2349b1877049f250551f49a4592e73765 (diff)
parentd76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-597488d37c9c358837616516d88f861f5c25f827.tar.xz
Merge #19871: doc: Clarify scope of eviction protection of outbound block-relay peers
d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4 [doc] Clarify semantic of peer's m_protect w.r.t to outbound eviction logics (Antoine Riard) ac71fe936da290adf5a3155fe8db5f78b485f1f1 [doc] Clarify scope of eviction protection of outbound block-relay peers (Antoine Riard) Pull request description: Block-relay-only peers were introduced by #15759. According to its author, it was intented to make them only immune to outbound peer rotation-based eviction and not from all eviction as modified comment leans to think of. Clearly indicate that outbound block-relay peers aren't protected from eviction by the bad/lagging chain logic. Fix #19863 ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: ACK d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4 jonatack: ACK d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4 Tree-SHA512: 597fbd62838a6e39276024165b11514cad20a2e9d33cf9202d261cbadcb62b2df427c858e0cb57e585840d4c1d4600104aa53916bb868541f2580e4eed9b4b52
Diffstat (limited to 'src/net_processing.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/net_processing.cpp27
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index d3a357fee2..9603d098a4 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -334,10 +334,17 @@ struct CNodeState {
*/
bool fSupportsDesiredCmpctVersion;
- /** State used to enforce CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT
- * Only in effect for outbound, non-manual, full-relay connections, with
- * m_protect == false
- * Algorithm: if a peer's best known block has less work than our tip,
+ /** State used to enforce CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT and EXTRA_PEER_CHECK_INTERVAL logic.
+ *
+ * Both are only in effect for outbound, non-manual, non-protected connections.
+ * Any peer protected (m_protect = true) is not chosen for eviction. A peer is
+ * marked as protected if all of these are true:
+ * - its connection type is IsBlockOnlyConn() == false
+ * - it gave us a valid connecting header
+ * - we haven't reached MAX_OUTBOUND_PEERS_TO_PROTECT_FROM_DISCONNECT yet
+ * - it has a better chain than we have
+ *
+ * CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT: if a peer's best known block has less work than our tip,
* set a timeout CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT seconds in the future:
* - If at timeout their best known block now has more work than our tip
* when the timeout was set, then either reset the timeout or clear it
@@ -347,6 +354,9 @@ struct CNodeState {
* and set a shorter timeout, HEADERS_RESPONSE_TIME seconds in future.
* If their best known block is still behind when that new timeout is
* reached, disconnect.
+ *
+ * EXTRA_PEER_CHECK_INTERVAL: after each interval, if we have too many outbound peers,
+ * drop the outbound one that least recently announced us a new block.
*/
struct ChainSyncTimeoutState {
//! A timeout used for checking whether our peer has sufficiently synced
@@ -2018,11 +2028,12 @@ void PeerManager::ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::vector<CBlockHe
}
}
+ // If this is an outbound full-relay peer, check to see if we should protect
+ // it from the bad/lagging chain logic.
+ // Note that outbound block-relay peers are excluded from this protection, and
+ // thus always subject to eviction under the bad/lagging chain logic.
+ // See ChainSyncTimeoutState.
if (!pfrom.fDisconnect && pfrom.IsFullOutboundConn() && nodestate->pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr) {
- // If this is an outbound full-relay peer, check to see if we should protect
- // it from the bad/lagging chain logic.
- // Note that block-relay-only peers are already implicitly protected, so we
- // only consider setting m_protect for the full-relay peers.
if (g_outbound_peers_with_protect_from_disconnect < MAX_OUTBOUND_PEERS_TO_PROTECT_FROM_DISCONNECT && nodestate->pindexBestKnownBlock->nChainWork >= ::ChainActive().Tip()->nChainWork && !nodestate->m_chain_sync.m_protect) {
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Protecting outbound peer=%d from eviction\n", pfrom.GetId());
nodestate->m_chain_sync.m_protect = true;