fix sdaftuar's nits again

it boggles the mind why these nits can't be delivered on a more timely basis

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp
index d9bf3bd757..7d75e2ea65 100644
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -799,10 +799,10 @@ bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags)
     index.pprev = tip;
     // CheckSequenceLocks() uses chainActive.Height()+1 to evaluate
     // height based locks because when SequenceLocks() is called within
-    // CBlock::AcceptBlock(), the height of the block *being*
-    // evaluated is what is used. Thus if we want to know if a
-    // transaction can be part of the *next* block, we need to call
-    // SequenceLocks() with one more than chainActive.Height().
+    // ConnectBlock(), the height of the block *being*
+    // evaluated is what is used.
+    // Thus if we want to know if a transaction can be part of the
+    // *next* block, we need to use one more than chainActive.Height()
     index.nHeight = tip->nHeight + 1;
 
     // pcoinsTip contains the UTXO set for chainActive.Tip()
@@ -2240,7 +2240,7 @@ bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBlockIndex* pin
             }
 
             if (!SequenceLocks(tx, nLockTimeFlags, &prevheights, *pindex)) {
-                return state.DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock(): contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__),
+                return state.DoS(100, error("%s: contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__),
                                  REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-nonfinal");
             }