diff options
author | Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> | 2012-02-17 17:58:02 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> | 2012-03-03 18:26:36 +0100 |
commit | a206b0ea12eb4606b93323268fc81a4f1f952531 (patch) | |
tree | 9691c6cfc013c7efb7692502a5f43b283ba6e42a /src/main.cpp | |
parent | 50abb5516da51fc518fe363bd445afbab70c71ec (diff) |
Do not allow overwriting unspent transactions (BIP 30)
Introduce the following network rule:
* a block is not valid if it contains a transaction whose hash
already exists in the block chain, unless all that transaction's
outputs were already spent before said block.
Warning: this is effectively a network rule change, with potential
risk for forking the block chain. Leaving this unfixed carries the
same risk however, for attackers that can cause a reorganisation
in part of the network.
Thanks to Russell O'Connor and Ben Reeves.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/main.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/main.cpp | 26 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp index 995195289f..20aa069a79 100644 --- a/src/main.cpp +++ b/src/main.cpp @@ -976,8 +976,10 @@ bool CTransaction::DisconnectInputs(CTxDB& txdb) } // Remove transaction from index - if (!txdb.EraseTxIndex(*this)) - return error("DisconnectInputs() : EraseTxPos failed"); + // This can fail if a duplicate of this transaction was in a chain that got + // reorganized away. This is only possible if this transaction was completely + // spent, so erasing it would be a no-op anway. + txdb.EraseTxIndex(*this); return true; } @@ -1256,6 +1258,26 @@ bool CBlock::ConnectBlock(CTxDB& txdb, CBlockIndex* pindex) if (!CheckBlock()) return false; + // Do not allow blocks that contain transactions which 'overwrite' older transactions, + // unless those are already completely spent. + // If such overwrites are allowed, coinbases and transactions depending upon those + // can be duplicated to remove the ability to spend the first instance -- even after + // being sent to another address. + // See BIP30 and http://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html for more information. + // This logic is not necessary for memory pool transactions, as AcceptToMemoryPool + // already refuses previously-known transaction id's entirely. + // This rule applies to all blocks whose timestamp is after March 15, 2012, 0:00 UTC. + // On testnet it is enabled as of februari 20, 2012, 0:00 UTC. + if (pindex->nTime > 1331769600 || (fTestNet && pindex->nTime > 1329696000)) + BOOST_FOREACH(CTransaction& tx, vtx) + { + CTxIndex txindexOld; + if (txdb.ReadTxIndex(tx.GetHash(), txindexOld)) + BOOST_FOREACH(CDiskTxPos &pos, txindexOld.vSpent) + if (pos.IsNull()) + return false; + } + // To avoid being on the short end of a block-chain split, // don't do secondary validation of pay-to-script-hash transactions // until blocks with timestamps after paytoscripthashtime (see init.cpp for default). |