diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2014-07-17 14:07:53 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> | 2014-07-21 07:46:33 +0200 |
commit | 67cc8f25c267ea7cde765f566fa10bc248c15ea2 (patch) | |
tree | 909f5b241512b21409a9f70e13b4a6edd31c78d2 /src/main.cpp | |
parent | 0de61e7585e14cb552e985934fc5ddfeb6e8bd67 (diff) |
Revert "Remove signal DoubleSpendDetected, use function"
This reverts commit 0da6b3fd187da3aa810aaa584d8bd197ad4fa2b9.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/main.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | src/main.cpp | 103 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 47 deletions
diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp index dd9e76378e..7ff1bdb2e7 100644 --- a/src/main.cpp +++ b/src/main.cpp @@ -126,14 +126,9 @@ namespace { } // anon namespace -// Bloom filter to limit respend relays to one +// Forward reference functions defined here: static const unsigned int MAX_DOUBLESPEND_BLOOM = 1000; -static CBloomFilter doubleSpendFilter; -void InitRespendFilter() { - seed_insecure_rand(); - doubleSpendFilter = CBloomFilter(MAX_DOUBLESPEND_BLOOM, 0.01, insecure_rand(), BLOOM_UPDATE_NONE); -} - +static bool RelayableRespend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter); ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // @@ -157,10 +152,24 @@ struct CMainSignals { boost::signals2::signal<void (const uint256 &)> Inventory; // Tells listeners to broadcast their data. boost::signals2::signal<void ()> Broadcast; + // Notifies listeners of detection of a double-spent transaction. Arguments are outpoint that is + // double-spent, first transaction seen, double-spend transaction, and whether the second double-spend + // transaction was first seen in a block. + // Note: only notifies if the previous transaction is in the memory pool; if previous transction was in a block, + // then the double-spend simply fails when we try to lookup the inputs in the current UTXO set. + boost::signals2::signal<bool (const COutPoint&, const CTransaction&, bool)> DetectedDoubleSpend; } g_signals; } // anon namespace +void RegisterInternalSignals() { + static CBloomFilter doubleSpendFilter; + seed_insecure_rand(); + doubleSpendFilter = CBloomFilter(MAX_DOUBLESPEND_BLOOM, 0.01, insecure_rand(), BLOOM_UPDATE_NONE); + + g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend.connect(boost::bind(RelayableRespend, _1, _2, _3, doubleSpendFilter)); +} + void RegisterWallet(CWalletInterface* pwalletIn) { g_signals.SyncTransaction.connect(boost::bind(&CWalletInterface::SyncTransaction, pwalletIn, _1, _2)); @@ -897,45 +906,6 @@ bool RateLimitExceeded(double& dCount, int64_t& nLastTime, int64_t nLimit, unsig return false; } -static bool RelayableRespend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter) -{ - // Relaying double-spend attempts to our peers lets them detect when - // somebody might be trying to cheat them. However, blindly relaying - // every double-spend across the entire network gives attackers - // a denial-of-service attack: just generate a stream of double-spends - // re-spending the same (limited) set of outpoints owned by the attacker. - // So, we use a bloom filter and only relay (at most) the first double - // spend for each outpoint. False-positives ("we have already relayed") - // are OK, because if the peer doesn't hear about the double-spend - // from us they are very likely to hear about it from another peer, since - // each peer uses a different, randomized bloom filter. - - if (fInBlock || filter.contains(outPoint)) return false; - - // Apply an independent rate limit to double-spend relays - static double dRespendCount; - static int64_t nLastRespendTime; - static int64_t nRespendLimit = GetArg("-limitrespendrelay", 100); - unsigned int nSize = ::GetSerializeSize(doubleSpend, SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION); - - if (RateLimitExceeded(dRespendCount, nLastRespendTime, nRespendLimit, nSize)) - { - LogPrint("mempool", "Double-spend relay rejected by rate limiter\n"); - return false; - } - - LogPrint("mempool", "Rate limit dRespendCount: %g => %g\n", dRespendCount, dRespendCount+nSize); - - // Clear the filter on average every MAX_DOUBLE_SPEND_BLOOM - // insertions - if (insecure_rand()%MAX_DOUBLESPEND_BLOOM == 0) - filter.clear(); - - filter.insert(outPoint); - - return true; -} - bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransaction &tx, bool fLimitFree, bool* pfMissingInputs, bool fRejectInsaneFee) { @@ -973,7 +943,7 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa // Does tx conflict with a member of the pool, and is it not equivalent to that member? if (pool.mapNextTx.count(outpoint) && !tx.IsEquivalentTo(*pool.mapNextTx[outpoint].ptx)) { - relayableRespend = RelayableRespend(outpoint, tx, false, doubleSpendFilter); + relayableRespend = g_signals.DetectedDoubleSpend(outpoint, tx, false); if (!relayableRespend) return false; } @@ -1085,6 +1055,45 @@ bool AcceptToMemoryPool(CTxMemPool& pool, CValidationState &state, const CTransa return !relayableRespend; } +static bool RelayableRespend(const COutPoint& outPoint, const CTransaction& doubleSpend, bool fInBlock, CBloomFilter& filter) +{ + // Relaying double-spend attempts to our peers lets them detect when + // somebody might be trying to cheat them. However, blindly relaying + // every double-spend across the entire network gives attackers + // a denial-of-service attack: just generate a stream of double-spends + // re-spending the same (limited) set of outpoints owned by the attacker. + // So, we use a bloom filter and only relay (at most) the first double + // spend for each outpoint. False-positives ("we have already relayed") + // are OK, because if the peer doesn't hear about the double-spend + // from us they are very likely to hear about it from another peer, since + // each peer uses a different, randomized bloom filter. + + if (fInBlock || filter.contains(outPoint)) return false; + + // Apply an independent rate limit to double-spend relays + static double dRespendCount; + static int64_t nLastRespendTime; + static int64_t nRespendLimit = GetArg("-limitrespendrelay", 100); + unsigned int nSize = ::GetSerializeSize(doubleSpend, SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION); + + if (RateLimitExceeded(dRespendCount, nLastRespendTime, nRespendLimit, nSize)) + { + LogPrint("mempool", "Double-spend relay rejected by rate limiter\n"); + return false; + } + + LogPrint("mempool", "Rate limit dRespendCount: %g => %g\n", dRespendCount, dRespendCount+nSize); + + // Clear the filter on average every MAX_DOUBLE_SPEND_BLOOM + // insertions + if (insecure_rand()%MAX_DOUBLESPEND_BLOOM == 0) + filter.clear(); + + filter.insert(outPoint); + + return true; +} + int CMerkleTx::GetDepthInMainChainINTERNAL(CBlockIndex* &pindexRet) const { |