aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/main.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2016-11-09 22:11:41 +0100
committerWladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>2016-11-09 22:11:47 +0100
commit9460771a60e28b42cd21ac38710dd9ee7f57cc71 (patch)
tree427767514f755da5ce530572c41f09937cfb0cee /src/main.cpp
parent59ce53c13cfca85418fad039538acb3bd21bbcf4 (diff)
parente8ef50ba51968da67a36c9fae6938d868b434da2 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-9460771a60e28b42cd21ac38710dd9ee7f57cc71.tar.xz
Merge #9048: [0.13 backport] Fix handling of invalid compact blocks
e8ef50b Bump the protocol version to distinguish new banning behavior. (Suhas Daftuar) 015865e Fix compact block handling to not ban if block is invalid (Suhas Daftuar) 8290506 [qa] Test that invalid compactblocks don't result in ban (Suhas Daftuar)
Diffstat (limited to 'src/main.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/main.cpp47
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp
index 84f4607dba..96734b839f 100644
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -178,8 +178,10 @@ namespace {
* Sources of received blocks, saved to be able to send them reject
* messages or ban them when processing happens afterwards. Protected by
* cs_main.
+ * Set mapBlockSource[hash].second to false if the node should not be
+ * punished if the block is invalid.
*/
- map<uint256, NodeId> mapBlockSource;
+ map<uint256, std::pair<NodeId, bool>> mapBlockSource;
/**
* Filter for transactions that were recently rejected by
@@ -1885,13 +1887,13 @@ void static InvalidChainFound(CBlockIndex* pindexNew)
void static InvalidBlockFound(CBlockIndex *pindex, const CValidationState &state) {
int nDoS = 0;
if (state.IsInvalid(nDoS)) {
- std::map<uint256, NodeId>::iterator it = mapBlockSource.find(pindex->GetBlockHash());
- if (it != mapBlockSource.end() && State(it->second)) {
+ std::map<uint256, std::pair<NodeId, bool>>::iterator it = mapBlockSource.find(pindex->GetBlockHash());
+ if (it != mapBlockSource.end() && State(it->second.first)) {
assert (state.GetRejectCode() < REJECT_INTERNAL); // Blocks are never rejected with internal reject codes
CBlockReject reject = {(unsigned char)state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason().substr(0, MAX_REJECT_MESSAGE_LENGTH), pindex->GetBlockHash()};
- State(it->second)->rejects.push_back(reject);
- if (nDoS > 0)
- Misbehaving(it->second, nDoS);
+ State(it->second.first)->rejects.push_back(reject);
+ if (nDoS > 0 && it->second.second)
+ Misbehaving(it->second.first, nDoS);
}
}
if (!state.CorruptionPossible()) {
@@ -3761,7 +3763,7 @@ static bool IsSuperMajority(int minVersion, const CBlockIndex* pstart, unsigned
}
-bool ProcessNewBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CNode* pfrom, const CBlock* pblock, bool fForceProcessing, const CDiskBlockPos* dbp)
+bool ProcessNewBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CNode* pfrom, const CBlock* pblock, bool fForceProcessing, const CDiskBlockPos* dbp, bool fMayBanPeerIfInvalid)
{
{
LOCK(cs_main);
@@ -3773,7 +3775,7 @@ bool ProcessNewBlock(CValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, C
bool fNewBlock = false;
bool ret = AcceptBlock(*pblock, state, chainparams, &pindex, fRequested, dbp, &fNewBlock);
if (pindex && pfrom) {
- mapBlockSource[pindex->GetBlockHash()] = pfrom->GetId();
+ mapBlockSource[pindex->GetBlockHash()] = std::make_pair(pfrom->GetId(), fMayBanPeerIfInvalid);
if (fNewBlock) pfrom->nLastBlockTime = GetTime();
}
CheckBlockIndex(chainparams.GetConsensus());
@@ -4717,7 +4719,6 @@ std::string GetWarnings(const std::string& strFor)
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-//
// Messages
//
@@ -5793,17 +5794,33 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv,
invs.push_back(CInv(MSG_BLOCK | GetFetchFlags(pfrom, chainActive.Tip(), chainparams.GetConsensus()), resp.blockhash));
pfrom->PushMessage(NetMsgType::GETDATA, invs);
} else {
+ // Block is either okay, or possibly we received
+ // READ_STATUS_CHECKBLOCK_FAILED.
+ // Note that CheckBlock can only fail for one of a few reasons:
+ // 1. bad-proof-of-work (impossible here, because we've already
+ // accepted the header)
+ // 2. merkleroot doesn't match the transactions given (already
+ // caught in FillBlock with READ_STATUS_FAILED, so
+ // impossible here)
+ // 3. the block is otherwise invalid (eg invalid coinbase,
+ // block is too big, too many legacy sigops, etc).
+ // So if CheckBlock failed, #3 is the only possibility.
+ // Under BIP 152, we don't DoS-ban unless proof of work is
+ // invalid (we don't require all the stateless checks to have
+ // been run). This is handled below, so just treat this as
+ // though the block was successfully read, and rely on the
+ // handling in ProcessNewBlock to ensure the block index is
+ // updated, reject messages go out, etc.
CValidationState state;
- ProcessNewBlock(state, chainparams, pfrom, &block, false, NULL);
+ // BIP 152 permits peers to relay compact blocks after validating
+ // the header only; we should not punish peers if the block turns
+ // out to be invalid.
+ ProcessNewBlock(state, chainparams, pfrom, &block, false, NULL, false);
int nDoS;
if (state.IsInvalid(nDoS)) {
assert (state.GetRejectCode() < REJECT_INTERNAL); // Blocks are never rejected with internal reject codes
pfrom->PushMessage(NetMsgType::REJECT, strCommand, (unsigned char)state.GetRejectCode(),
state.GetRejectReason().substr(0, MAX_REJECT_MESSAGE_LENGTH), block.GetHash());
- if (nDoS > 0) {
- LOCK(cs_main);
- Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), nDoS);
- }
}
}
}
@@ -5970,7 +5987,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv,
// Such an unrequested block may still be processed, subject to the
// conditions in AcceptBlock().
bool forceProcessing = pfrom->fWhitelisted && !IsInitialBlockDownload();
- ProcessNewBlock(state, chainparams, pfrom, &block, forceProcessing, NULL);
+ ProcessNewBlock(state, chainparams, pfrom, &block, forceProcessing, NULL, true);
int nDoS;
if (state.IsInvalid(nDoS)) {
assert (state.GetRejectCode() < REJECT_INTERNAL); // Blocks are never rejected with internal reject codes