diff options
| author | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2018-09-13 09:25:49 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2018-09-13 09:28:46 -0400 |
| commit | 962c302710cd6556a85ba953bac236f33b8e1a09 (patch) | |
| tree | 9f1bc81bd321fdcf679b78b45d4008aacd73db47 /src/fs.cpp | |
| parent | b9ed2fd026926cafe38a1ee23d47eb891a94ddb1 (diff) | |
| parent | fa6ab8ada14dd265e224496440ab0b5d99dfd0ef (diff) | |
| download | bitcoin-962c302710cd6556a85ba953bac236f33b8e1a09.tar.xz | |
Merge #13983: rpc: Return more specific reject reason for submitblock
fa6ab8ada1 rpc: Return more specific reject reason for submitblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The second commit in #13439 made the `TODO` in the first commit impossible to solve.
The meaning of `fNewBlock` changed from "This is the first time we process this block" to "We are about to write the new *valid* block".
So whenever `fNewBlock` is true, the block was valid. And whenever the `fNewBlock` is false, the block is either valid or invalid. If it was valid and not new, we know it is a `"duplicate"`. In all other cases, the `BIP22ValidationResult()` will return the reason why it is invalid.
Tree-SHA512: 4b6edf7a912339c3acb0fccfabbdd6d812a0321fb1639c244c2714e58dc119aa2b8c6bf8f7d61ea609a1b861bbc23f920370fcf989c48452721e259a8ce93d24
Diffstat (limited to 'src/fs.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions