diff options
| author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2019-09-18 15:53:36 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2019-09-18 16:00:54 +0200 |
| commit | feb162d500273040c8a2e5cdd3393edf34dff45b (patch) | |
| tree | ef7a794d7593badd819f94c68685b42e4a5362a5 /src/consensus | |
| parent | 4b5e5ef4cec38cb2e3ea4a509e9d90a2088a18c1 (diff) | |
| parent | 0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e (diff) | |
| download | bitcoin-feb162d500273040c8a2e5cdd3393edf34dff45b.tar.xz | |
Merge #14696: qa: Add explicit references to related CVE's in p2p_invalid_block test.
0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev)
38bfca6bb2ad68719415e9c54a981441052da072 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out.
Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation.
This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation
Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
Diffstat (limited to 'src/consensus')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/consensus/tx_check.cpp | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp b/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp index 23ed3ecb53..00ebbbd1ab 100644 --- a/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp +++ b/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ bool CheckTransaction(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState &state, bool fChe if (::GetSerializeSize(tx, PROTOCOL_VERSION | SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS) * WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR > MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT) return state.Invalid(ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-oversize"); - // Check for negative or overflow output values + // Check for negative or overflow output values (see CVE-2010-5139) CAmount nValueOut = 0; for (const auto& txout : tx.vout) { |