Tests: make prioritise_transaction.py more robust

Github-Pull: #7697
Rebased-From: ec143391ef791c15c0d4520befb8863b61bfc2ea

2 files changed, 39 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/qa/rpc-tests/prioritise_transaction.py b/qa/rpc-tests/prioritise_transaction.py
index 5064667053..f8d9063b4e 100755
--- a/qa/rpc-tests/prioritise_transaction.py
+++ b/qa/rpc-tests/prioritise_transaction.py
@@ -9,8 +9,7 @@
 
 from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
 from test_framework.util import *
-from test_framework.mininode import COIN
-
+from test_framework.mininode import COIN, MAX_BLOCK_SIZE
 
 class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
 
@@ -29,14 +28,29 @@ class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         self.relayfee = self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()['relayfee']
 
     def run_test(self):
-        utxos = create_confirmed_utxos(self.relayfee, self.nodes[0], 90)
+        utxo_count = 90
+        utxos = create_confirmed_utxos(self.relayfee, self.nodes[0], utxo_count)
         base_fee = self.relayfee*100 # our transactions are smaller than 100kb
         txids = []
 
         # Create 3 batches of transactions at 3 different fee rate levels
+        range_size = utxo_count // 3
         for i in xrange(3):
             txids.append([])
-            txids[i] = create_lots_of_big_transactions(self.nodes[0], self.txouts, utxos[30*i:30*i+30], (i+1)*base_fee)
+            start_range = i * range_size
+            end_range = start_range + range_size
+            txids[i] = create_lots_of_big_transactions(self.nodes[0], self.txouts, utxos[start_range:end_range], (i+1)*base_fee)
+
+        # Make sure that the size of each group of transactions exceeds
+        # MAX_BLOCK_SIZE -- otherwise the test needs to be revised to create
+        # more transactions.
+        mempool = self.nodes[0].getrawmempool(True)
+        sizes = [0, 0, 0]
+        for i in xrange(3):
+            for j in txids[i]:
+                assert(j in mempool)
+                sizes[i] += mempool[j]['size']
+            assert(sizes[i] > MAX_BLOCK_SIZE) # Fail => raise utxo_count
 
         # add a fee delta to something in the cheapest bucket and make sure it gets mined
         # also check that a different entry in the cheapest bucket is NOT mined (lower
@@ -47,7 +61,7 @@ class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         self.nodes[0].generate(1)
 
         mempool = self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()
-        print "Assert that prioritised transasction was mined"
+        print "Assert that prioritised transaction was mined"
         assert(txids[0][0] not in mempool)
         assert(txids[0][1] in mempool)
 
@@ -60,7 +74,7 @@ class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         assert(high_fee_tx != None)
 
         # Add a prioritisation before a tx is in the mempool (de-prioritising a
-        # high-fee transaction).
+        # high-fee transaction so that it's now low fee).
         self.nodes[0].prioritisetransaction(high_fee_tx, -1e15, -int(2*base_fee*COIN))
 
         # Add everything back to mempool
@@ -70,8 +84,11 @@ class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         mempool = self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()
         assert(high_fee_tx in mempool)
 
-        # Now verify the high feerate transaction isn't mined.
-        self.nodes[0].generate(5)
+        # Now verify the modified-high feerate transaction isn't mined before
+        # the other high fee transactions. Keep mining until our mempool has
+        # decreased by all the high fee size that we calculated above.
+        while (self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['bytes'] > sizes[0] + sizes[1]):
+            self.nodes[0].generate(1)
 
         # High fee transaction should not have been mined, but other high fee rate
         # transactions should have been.
diff --git a/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/util.py b/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/util.py
index d8bb63dbbb..5b9ce890ba 100644
--- a/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/util.py
+++ b/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/util.py
@@ -427,6 +427,8 @@ def assert_is_hash_string(string, length=64):
 def satoshi_round(amount):
     return  Decimal(amount).quantize(Decimal('0.00000001'), rounding=ROUND_DOWN)
 
+# Helper to create at least "count" utxos
+# Pass in a fee that is sufficient for relay and mining new transactions.
 def create_confirmed_utxos(fee, node, count):
     node.generate(int(0.5*count)+101)
     utxos = node.listunspent()
@@ -454,6 +456,8 @@ def create_confirmed_utxos(fee, node, count):
     assert(len(utxos) >= count)
     return utxos
 
+# Create large OP_RETURN txouts that can be appended to a transaction
+# to make it large (helper for constructing large transactions).
 def gen_return_txouts():
     # Some pre-processing to create a bunch of OP_RETURN txouts to insert into transactions we create
     # So we have big transactions (and therefore can't fit very many into each block)
@@ -472,6 +476,16 @@ def gen_return_txouts():
         txouts = txouts + script_pubkey
     return txouts
 
+def create_tx(node, coinbase, to_address, amount):
+    inputs = [{ "txid" : coinbase, "vout" : 0}]
+    outputs = { to_address : amount }
+    rawtx = node.createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
+    signresult = node.signrawtransaction(rawtx)
+    assert_equal(signresult["complete"], True)
+    return signresult["hex"]
+
+# Create a spend of each passed-in utxo, splicing in "txouts" to each raw
+# transaction to make it large.  See gen_return_txouts() above.
 def create_lots_of_big_transactions(node, txouts, utxos, fee):
     addr = node.getnewaddress()
     txids = []