aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/script.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorglozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>2022-09-19 15:46:40 +0100
committerglozow <gloriajzhao@gmail.com>2022-09-19 15:51:53 +0100
commit55e1deb745531a0749f668ed7265770c70a58563 (patch)
tree164398432394b6ea1e9b042a378b99d871890ec0 /qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/script.py
parenta9ffebddbe7d3e5a21f8c794dc1c61ceb649f345 (diff)
parente8cc2e4afc1142aa2b3da19cd5c17deea9963244 (diff)
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25540: miniscript: avoid wasteful computation, prevent memory blowup when fuzzing
e8cc2e4afc1142aa2b3da19cd5c17deea9963244 Make miniscript string parsing account for exact script size as bound (Pieter Wuille) 4cb8f9a92c0ab5d45f2e545bbc13fc3f2ec611ea Permit delaying duplicate key check in miniscript::Node construction (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: As reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24860#discussion_r893109311, the current code to construct a `miniscript::Node` could cause a blowup on large fuzzer inputs. This is because: 1. The duplicate key check is redundantly done at parsing time, since we will recursively create miniscript nodes and the constructor will unconditionally look for duplicate across this node's keys and all its sub-nodes'. 2. We don't put an upper bound on the size of the inputs to consider for parsing. To avoid wasteful computation, and prevent the blowup on some fuzzer inputs, limit the size of reasonable inputs and only perform the check for duplicate keys once when parsing. Regarding the duplicate key check bypass in the constructor we iterated on different approaches, and eventually settled on passing a dummy argument. Albeit less elegant, all other approaches required getting rid of `std::make_shared` and adding an allocation *per node created*. This PR contains code from Pieter Wuille (see commits). Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25824. ACKs for top commit: darosior: ACK e8cc2e4afc1142aa2b3da19cd5c17deea9963244 -- it's my own PR but most of the code here was written by sipa. I've reviewed and tested it. sipa: ACK e8cc2e4afc1142aa2b3da19cd5c17deea9963244 (for the few parts of the code that aren't mine) Tree-SHA512: c21de39b3eeb484393758629882fcf8694a9bd1b8f15ae22efcec1582efc9c2309c5a0c2d90f361dd8e233d704a07dcd5fb982f4a48a002c4d8789e1d78bb526
Diffstat (limited to 'qa/rpc-tests/test_framework/script.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions