diff options
author | John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> | 2017-03-08 15:56:30 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com> | 2017-03-20 10:40:31 -0400 |
commit | 00902c48cdc5d6a531abfd279fd8e7779cf0a0b8 (patch) | |
tree | 41891484a478a7478937fe4a12b63e6c7f31799a /qa/rpc-tests/p2p-acceptblock.py | |
parent | d34995a7bac6ed20ce42aa00c6252b900786e649 (diff) | |
download | bitcoin-00902c48cdc5d6a531abfd279fd8e7779cf0a0b8.tar.xz |
Rename qa directory to test
Diffstat (limited to 'qa/rpc-tests/p2p-acceptblock.py')
-rwxr-xr-x | qa/rpc-tests/p2p-acceptblock.py | 277 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 277 deletions
diff --git a/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-acceptblock.py b/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-acceptblock.py deleted file mode 100755 index e1111da4ae..0000000000 --- a/qa/rpc-tests/p2p-acceptblock.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,277 +0,0 @@ -#!/usr/bin/env python3 -# Copyright (c) 2015-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers -# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying -# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php. -"""Test processing of unrequested blocks. - -Since behavior differs when receiving unrequested blocks from whitelisted peers -versus non-whitelisted peers, this tests the behavior of both (effectively two -separate tests running in parallel). - -Setup: two nodes, node0 and node1, not connected to each other. Node0 does not -whitelist localhost, but node1 does. They will each be on their own chain for -this test. - -We have one NodeConn connection to each, test_node and white_node respectively. - -The test: -1. Generate one block on each node, to leave IBD. - -2. Mine a new block on each tip, and deliver to each node from node's peer. - The tip should advance. - -3. Mine a block that forks the previous block, and deliver to each node from - corresponding peer. - Node0 should not process this block (just accept the header), because it is - unrequested and doesn't have more work than the tip. - Node1 should process because this is coming from a whitelisted peer. - -4. Send another block that builds on the forking block. - Node0 should process this block but be stuck on the shorter chain, because - it's missing an intermediate block. - Node1 should reorg to this longer chain. - -4b.Send 288 more blocks on the longer chain. - Node0 should process all but the last block (too far ahead in height). - Send all headers to Node1, and then send the last block in that chain. - Node1 should accept the block because it's coming from a whitelisted peer. - -5. Send a duplicate of the block in #3 to Node0. - Node0 should not process the block because it is unrequested, and stay on - the shorter chain. - -6. Send Node0 an inv for the height 3 block produced in #4 above. - Node0 should figure out that Node0 has the missing height 2 block and send a - getdata. - -7. Send Node0 the missing block again. - Node0 should process and the tip should advance. -""" - -from test_framework.mininode import * -from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework -from test_framework.util import * -import time -from test_framework.blocktools import create_block, create_coinbase - -# TestNode: bare-bones "peer". Used mostly as a conduit for a test to sending -# p2p messages to a node, generating the messages in the main testing logic. -class TestNode(NodeConnCB): - def __init__(self): - NodeConnCB.__init__(self) - self.connection = None - self.ping_counter = 1 - self.last_pong = msg_pong() - - def add_connection(self, conn): - self.connection = conn - - # Track the last getdata message we receive (used in the test) - def on_getdata(self, conn, message): - self.last_getdata = message - - # Spin until verack message is received from the node. - # We use this to signal that our test can begin. This - # is called from the testing thread, so it needs to acquire - # the global lock. - def wait_for_verack(self): - while True: - with mininode_lock: - if self.verack_received: - return - time.sleep(0.05) - - # Wrapper for the NodeConn's send_message function - def send_message(self, message): - self.connection.send_message(message) - - def on_pong(self, conn, message): - self.last_pong = message - - # Sync up with the node after delivery of a block - def sync_with_ping(self, timeout=30): - self.connection.send_message(msg_ping(nonce=self.ping_counter)) - received_pong = False - sleep_time = 0.05 - while not received_pong and timeout > 0: - time.sleep(sleep_time) - timeout -= sleep_time - with mininode_lock: - if self.last_pong.nonce == self.ping_counter: - received_pong = True - self.ping_counter += 1 - return received_pong - - -class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework): - def add_options(self, parser): - parser.add_option("--testbinary", dest="testbinary", - default=os.getenv("BITCOIND", "bitcoind"), - help="bitcoind binary to test") - - def __init__(self): - super().__init__() - self.setup_clean_chain = True - self.num_nodes = 2 - - def setup_network(self): - # Node0 will be used to test behavior of processing unrequested blocks - # from peers which are not whitelisted, while Node1 will be used for - # the whitelisted case. - self.nodes = [] - self.nodes.append(start_node(0, self.options.tmpdir, - binary=self.options.testbinary)) - self.nodes.append(start_node(1, self.options.tmpdir, - ["-whitelist=127.0.0.1"], - binary=self.options.testbinary)) - - def run_test(self): - # Setup the p2p connections and start up the network thread. - test_node = TestNode() # connects to node0 (not whitelisted) - white_node = TestNode() # connects to node1 (whitelisted) - - connections = [] - connections.append(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(0), self.nodes[0], test_node)) - connections.append(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(1), self.nodes[1], white_node)) - test_node.add_connection(connections[0]) - white_node.add_connection(connections[1]) - - NetworkThread().start() # Start up network handling in another thread - - # Test logic begins here - test_node.wait_for_verack() - white_node.wait_for_verack() - - # 1. Have both nodes mine a block (leave IBD) - [ n.generate(1) for n in self.nodes ] - tips = [ int("0x" + n.getbestblockhash(), 0) for n in self.nodes ] - - # 2. Send one block that builds on each tip. - # This should be accepted. - blocks_h2 = [] # the height 2 blocks on each node's chain - block_time = int(time.time()) + 1 - for i in range(2): - blocks_h2.append(create_block(tips[i], create_coinbase(2), block_time)) - blocks_h2[i].solve() - block_time += 1 - test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[0])) - white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[1])) - - [ x.sync_with_ping() for x in [test_node, white_node] ] - assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 2) - assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 2) - self.log.info("First height 2 block accepted by both nodes") - - # 3. Send another block that builds on the original tip. - blocks_h2f = [] # Blocks at height 2 that fork off the main chain - for i in range(2): - blocks_h2f.append(create_block(tips[i], create_coinbase(2), blocks_h2[i].nTime+1)) - blocks_h2f[i].solve() - test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[0])) - white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[1])) - - [ x.sync_with_ping() for x in [test_node, white_node] ] - for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips(): - if x['hash'] == blocks_h2f[0].hash: - assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only") - - for x in self.nodes[1].getchaintips(): - if x['hash'] == blocks_h2f[1].hash: - assert_equal(x['status'], "valid-headers") - - self.log.info("Second height 2 block accepted only from whitelisted peer") - - # 4. Now send another block that builds on the forking chain. - blocks_h3 = [] - for i in range(2): - blocks_h3.append(create_block(blocks_h2f[i].sha256, create_coinbase(3), blocks_h2f[i].nTime+1)) - blocks_h3[i].solve() - test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h3[0])) - white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h3[1])) - - [ x.sync_with_ping() for x in [test_node, white_node] ] - # Since the earlier block was not processed by node0, the new block - # can't be fully validated. - for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips(): - if x['hash'] == blocks_h3[0].hash: - assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only") - - # But this block should be accepted by node0 since it has more work. - self.nodes[0].getblock(blocks_h3[0].hash) - self.log.info("Unrequested more-work block accepted from non-whitelisted peer") - - # Node1 should have accepted and reorged. - assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 3) - self.log.info("Successfully reorged to length 3 chain from whitelisted peer") - - # 4b. Now mine 288 more blocks and deliver; all should be processed but - # the last (height-too-high) on node0. Node1 should process the tip if - # we give it the headers chain leading to the tip. - tips = blocks_h3 - headers_message = msg_headers() - all_blocks = [] # node0's blocks - for j in range(2): - for i in range(288): - next_block = create_block(tips[j].sha256, create_coinbase(i + 4), tips[j].nTime+1) - next_block.solve() - if j==0: - test_node.send_message(msg_block(next_block)) - all_blocks.append(next_block) - else: - headers_message.headers.append(CBlockHeader(next_block)) - tips[j] = next_block - - time.sleep(2) - # Blocks 1-287 should be accepted, block 288 should be ignored because it's too far ahead - for x in all_blocks[:-1]: - self.nodes[0].getblock(x.hash) - assert_raises_jsonrpc(-1, "Block not found on disk", self.nodes[0].getblock, all_blocks[-1].hash) - - headers_message.headers.pop() # Ensure the last block is unrequested - white_node.send_message(headers_message) # Send headers leading to tip - white_node.send_message(msg_block(tips[1])) # Now deliver the tip - white_node.sync_with_ping() - self.nodes[1].getblock(tips[1].hash) - self.log.info("Unrequested block far ahead of tip accepted from whitelisted peer") - - # 5. Test handling of unrequested block on the node that didn't process - # Should still not be processed (even though it has a child that has more - # work). - test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[0])) - - # Here, if the sleep is too short, the test could falsely succeed (if the - # node hasn't processed the block by the time the sleep returns, and then - # the node processes it and incorrectly advances the tip). - # But this would be caught later on, when we verify that an inv triggers - # a getdata request for this block. - test_node.sync_with_ping() - assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 2) - self.log.info("Unrequested block that would complete more-work chain was ignored") - - # 6. Try to get node to request the missing block. - # Poke the node with an inv for block at height 3 and see if that - # triggers a getdata on block 2 (it should if block 2 is missing). - with mininode_lock: - # Clear state so we can check the getdata request - test_node.last_getdata = None - test_node.send_message(msg_inv([CInv(2, blocks_h3[0].sha256)])) - - test_node.sync_with_ping() - with mininode_lock: - getdata = test_node.last_getdata - - # Check that the getdata includes the right block - assert_equal(getdata.inv[0].hash, blocks_h2f[0].sha256) - self.log.info("Inv at tip triggered getdata for unprocessed block") - - # 7. Send the missing block for the third time (now it is requested) - test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[0])) - - test_node.sync_with_ping() - assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 290) - self.log.info("Successfully reorged to longer chain from non-whitelisted peer") - - [ c.disconnect_node() for c in connections ] - -if __name__ == '__main__': - AcceptBlockTest().main() |