diff options
author | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2021-03-01 11:39:28 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> | 2021-03-01 11:45:42 +0100 |
commit | 362e901a17cce80cb6af97d4c69dce3f1e7c695b (patch) | |
tree | e1099b66f42436f0c0727fc9f103e66e5d78652d /doc | |
parent | e52ce9f2b312b3cf3b0837918e07d7603e241d63 (diff) | |
parent | a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f (diff) |
Merge #18466: rpc: fix invalid parameter error codes for {sign,verify}message RPCs
a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f doc: release note for changed {sign,verify}message error codes (Sebastian Falbesoner)
9e399b9b2d386b28c0c0ff59fc75d31dbec31d9c test: check parameter validity in rpc_signmessage.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
e62f0c71f10def124b1c1219d790cef246a32c3e rpc: fix {sign,message}verify RPC errors for invalid address/signature (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
RPCs that accept address parameters usually return the intended error code `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY` (-5) if a passed address is invalid. The two exceptions to the rule are `signmessage` and `verifymessage`, which return `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` (-3) in this case instead. Oddly enough `verifymessage` returns `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY` when the _signature_ was malformed, where `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` would be more approriate.
This PR fixes these inaccuracies and as well adds tests to `rpc_signmessage.py` that check the parameter validity and error codes for the related RPCs `signmessagewithprivkey`, `signmessage` and `verifymessage`.
master branch:
```
$ ./bitcoin-cli signmessage invalid_addr message
error code: -3
error message:
Invalid address
$ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage invalid_addr dummy_sig message
error code: -3
error message:
Invalid address
$ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX invalid_sig message
error code: -5
error message:
Malformed base64 encoding
```
PR branch:
```
$ ./bitcoin-cli signmessage invalid_addr message
error code: -5
error message:
Invalid address
$ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage invalid_addr dummy_sig message
error code: -5
error message:
Invalid address
$ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX invalid_sig message
error code: -3
error message:
Malformed base64 encoding
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f
meshcollider:
utACK a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f
Tree-SHA512: bae0c4595a2603cea66090f6033785601837b45fd853052312b3a39d8520566c581994b68f693dd247c22586c638c3b7689c849085cce548cc36b9bf0e119d2d
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/release-notes-18466.md | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/release-notes-18466.md b/doc/release-notes-18466.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e46d5064a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/release-notes-18466.md @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +Low-level RPC changes +--------------------- + +- Error codes have been updated to be more accurate for the following error cases (#18466): + - `signmessage` now returns RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY (-5) if the + passed address is invalid. Previously returned RPC_TYPE_ERROR (-3). + - `verifymessage` now returns RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY (-5) if the + passed address is invalid. Previously returned RPC_TYPE_ERROR (-3). + - `verifymessage` now returns RPC_TYPE_ERROR (-3) if the passed signature + is malformed. Previously returned RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY (-5). |