diff options
author | merge-script <fanquake@gmail.com> | 2024-07-16 09:48:11 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | merge-script <fanquake@gmail.com> | 2024-07-16 09:48:11 +0100 |
commit | 5f538f2a7caf81078beab708f0233170baa60d40 (patch) | |
tree | a033b54f714dd5a64c18a3754208ffab172c4638 /contrib | |
parent | 35dddbccf1fba3239b836c210c6a5eca88bf2311 (diff) | |
parent | 9010b1343b9f931f771d3d49dd03b57868c24d5d (diff) |
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30387: contrib: use c++ compiler rather than c compiler for binary checks
9010b1343b9f931f771d3d49dd03b57868c24d5d contrib: c++ify test stubs after switching to c++ compilers (Cory Fields)
261f77033349a83f14d39b8bb8a2df46085b47ad contrib: rename cc to cxx in binary checking scripts (Cory Fields)
a38c9600059a1583be244e0df198ffd9da375ba9 contrib: use c++ rather than c for binary tests (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
From hebasto's CMake repo. See discussion here: https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/pull/252#discussion_r1664657488
Use CXX/CXXFLAGS rather than CC/CFLAGS to test our actual compiler for binary checks rather than the one we only forward to secp256k1.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 9010b1343b9f931f771d3d49dd03b57868c24d5d.
fanquake:
ACK 9010b1343b9f931f771d3d49dd03b57868c24d5d
Tree-SHA512: 7b8788d7d3760103062eff10056c995e1ad14c0c487d9414683ad54d816c255d0ca751f4d0e2d2ad7f9e8a7101d8c7f1e9333fa5b137558ed68fa593c4b4ce6d
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib')
-rwxr-xr-x | contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py | 88 | ||||
-rwxr-xr-x | contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py | 50 |
2 files changed, 69 insertions, 69 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py b/contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py index 7bfd4d98da..de372cbd39 100755 --- a/contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py +++ b/contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ from utils import determine_wellknown_cmd def write_testcode(filename): with open(filename, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f: f.write(''' - #include <stdio.h> + #include <cstdio> int main() { - printf("the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy god\\n"); + std::printf("the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy god\\n"); return 0; } ''') @@ -34,17 +34,17 @@ def env_flags() -> list[str]: # See the definitions for ac_link in autoconf's lib/autoconf/c.m4 file for # reference. flags: list[str] = [] - for var in ['CFLAGS', 'CPPFLAGS', 'LDFLAGS']: + for var in ['CXXFLAGS', 'CPPFLAGS', 'LDFLAGS']: flags += filter(None, os.environ.get(var, '').split(' ')) return flags -def call_security_check(cc: str, source: str, executable: str, options) -> tuple: - subprocess.run([*cc,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags() + options, check=True) +def call_security_check(cxx: str, source: str, executable: str, options) -> tuple: + subprocess.run([*cxx,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags() + options, check=True) p = subprocess.run([os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'security-check.py'), executable], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, text=True) return (p.returncode, p.stdout.rstrip()) -def get_arch(cc, source, executable): - subprocess.run([*cc, source, '-o', executable] + env_flags(), check=True) +def get_arch(cxx, source, executable): + subprocess.run([*cxx, source, '-o', executable] + env_flags(), check=True) binary = lief.parse(executable) arch = binary.abstract.header.architecture os.remove(executable) @@ -52,93 +52,93 @@ def get_arch(cc, source, executable): class TestSecurityChecks(unittest.TestCase): def test_ELF(self): - source = 'test1.c' + source = 'test1.cpp' executable = 'test1' - cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CC', 'gcc') + cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++') write_testcode(source) - arch = get_arch(cc, source, executable) + arch = get_arch(cxx, source, executable) if arch == lief.ARCHITECTURES.X86: - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (1, executable+': failed PIE NX RELRO CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (1, executable+': failed RELRO CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']), (1, executable+': failed separate_code CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (1, executable+': failed CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code', '-fcf-protection=full']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code', '-fcf-protection=full']), (0, '')) else: - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (1, executable+': failed PIE NX RELRO')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (1, executable+': failed RELRO')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']), (1, executable+': failed separate_code')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']), (0, '')) clean_files(source, executable) def test_PE(self): - source = 'test1.c' + source = 'test1.cpp' executable = 'test1.exe' - cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CC', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc') + cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++') write_testcode(source) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--disable-nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fno-stack-protector']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--disable-nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fno-stack-protector']), (1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA NX RELOC_SECTION CONTROL_FLOW Canary')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), (1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA RELOC_SECTION CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), (1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), (1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA CONTROL_FLOW')) # -pie -fPIE does nothing unless --dynamicbase is also supplied - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), (1, executable+': failed HIGH_ENTROPY_VA CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), (1, executable+': failed CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE', '-fcf-protection=full','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE', '-fcf-protection=full','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']), (0, '')) clean_files(source, executable) def test_MACHO(self): - source = 'test1.c' + source = 'test1.cpp' executable = 'test1' - cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CC', 'clang') + cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++') write_testcode(source) - arch = get_arch(cc, source, executable) + arch = get_arch(cxx, source, executable) if arch == lief.ARCHITECTURES.X86: - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-no_pie','-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-no_pie','-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']), (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary FIXUP_CHAINS PIE CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']), (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']), (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']), (1, executable+': failed CONTROL_FLOW')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-fcf-protection=full', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-fcf-protection=full', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']), (0, '')) else: # arm64 darwin doesn't support non-PIE binaries, control flow or executable stacks - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']), (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary FIXUP_CHAINS BRANCH_PROTECTION')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']), (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']), (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS')) - self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']), + self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']), (0, '')) diff --git a/contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py b/contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py index b00004586c..454dbc6bd2 100755 --- a/contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py +++ b/contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py @@ -11,17 +11,17 @@ import unittest from utils import determine_wellknown_cmd -def call_symbol_check(cc: list[str], source, executable, options): +def call_symbol_check(cxx: list[str], source, executable, options): # This should behave the same as AC_TRY_LINK, so arrange well-known flags # in the same order as autoconf would. # # See the definitions for ac_link in autoconf's lib/autoconf/c.m4 file for # reference. env_flags: list[str] = [] - for var in ['CFLAGS', 'CPPFLAGS', 'LDFLAGS']: + for var in ['CXXFLAGS', 'CPPFLAGS', 'LDFLAGS']: env_flags += filter(None, os.environ.get(var, '').split(' ')) - subprocess.run([*cc,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags + options, check=True) + subprocess.run([*cxx,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags + options, check=True) p = subprocess.run([os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'symbol-check.py'), executable], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, text=True) os.remove(source) os.remove(executable) @@ -29,13 +29,13 @@ def call_symbol_check(cc: list[str], source, executable, options): class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase): def test_ELF(self): - source = 'test1.c' + source = 'test1.cpp' executable = 'test1' - cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CC', 'gcc') + cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++') # -lutil is part of the libc6 package so a safe bet that it's installed # it's also out of context enough that it's unlikely to ever become a real dependency - source = 'test2.c' + source = 'test2.cpp' executable = 'test2' with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f: f.write(''' @@ -48,31 +48,31 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase): } ''') - self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lutil']), + self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lutil']), (1, executable + ': libutil.so.1 is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!\n' + executable + ': failed LIBRARY_DEPENDENCIES')) # finally, check a simple conforming binary - source = 'test3.c' + source = 'test3.cpp' executable = 'test3' with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f: f.write(''' - #include <stdio.h> + #include <cstdio> int main() { - printf("42"); + std::printf("42"); return 0; } ''') - self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, []), + self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, []), (0, '')) def test_MACHO(self): - source = 'test1.c' + source = 'test1.cpp' executable = 'test1' - cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CC', 'clang') + cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++') with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f: f.write(''' @@ -86,11 +86,11 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase): ''') - self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lexpat', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']), + self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lexpat', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']), (1, 'libexpat.1.dylib is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!\n' + f'{executable}: failed DYNAMIC_LIBRARIES MIN_OS SDK')) - source = 'test2.c' + source = 'test2.cpp' executable = 'test2' with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f: f.write(''' @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase): } ''') - self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-framework', 'CoreGraphics', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']), + self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-framework', 'CoreGraphics', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']), (1, f'{executable}: failed MIN_OS SDK')) - source = 'test3.c' + source = 'test3.cpp' executable = 'test3' with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f: f.write(''' @@ -116,13 +116,13 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase): } ''') - self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.0', '-Wl,11.4']), + self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.0', '-Wl,11.4']), (1, f'{executable}: failed SDK')) def test_PE(self): - source = 'test1.c' + source = 'test1.cpp' executable = 'test1.exe' - cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CC', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc') + cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++') with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f: f.write(''' @@ -135,11 +135,11 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase): } ''') - self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lpdh', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']), + self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lpdh', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']), (1, 'pdh.dll is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!\n' + executable + ': failed DYNAMIC_LIBRARIES')) - source = 'test2.c' + source = 'test2.cpp' executable = 'test2.exe' with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f: @@ -150,10 +150,10 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase): } ''') - self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9']), + self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9']), (1, executable + ': failed SUBSYSTEM_VERSION')) - source = 'test3.c' + source = 'test3.cpp' executable = 'test3.exe' with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f: f.write(''' @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase): } ''') - self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lole32', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']), + self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lole32', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']), (0, '')) |