contrib: rename cc to cxx in binary checking scripts

2 files changed, 51 insertions, 51 deletions

diff --git a/contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py b/contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py
index 917d8f1b65..f1ea93dc7f 100755
--- a/contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py
+++ b/contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py
@@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ def env_flags() -> list[str]:
         flags += filter(None, os.environ.get(var, '').split(' '))
     return flags
 
-def call_security_check(cc: str, source: str, executable: str, options) -> tuple:
-    subprocess.run([*cc,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags() + options, check=True)
+def call_security_check(cxx: str, source: str, executable: str, options) -> tuple:
+    subprocess.run([*cxx,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags() + options, check=True)
     p = subprocess.run([os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'security-check.py'), executable], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, text=True)
     return (p.returncode, p.stdout.rstrip())
 
-def get_arch(cc, source, executable):
-    subprocess.run([*cc, source, '-o', executable] + env_flags(), check=True)
+def get_arch(cxx, source, executable):
+    subprocess.run([*cxx, source, '-o', executable] + env_flags(), check=True)
     binary = lief.parse(executable)
     arch = binary.abstract.header.architecture
     os.remove(executable)
@@ -54,37 +54,37 @@ class TestSecurityChecks(unittest.TestCase):
     def test_ELF(self):
         source = 'test1.cpp'
         executable = 'test1'
-        cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++')
+        cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++')
         write_testcode(source)
-        arch = get_arch(cc, source, executable)
+        arch = get_arch(cxx, source, executable)
 
         if arch == lief.ARCHITECTURES.X86:
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed PIE NX RELRO CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed RELRO CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed separate_code CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code', '-fcf-protection=full']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code', '-fcf-protection=full']),
                     (0, ''))
         else:
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed PIE NX RELRO'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed RELRO'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']),
                     (1, executable+': failed separate_code'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
                     (0, ''))
 
         clean_files(source, executable)
@@ -92,22 +92,22 @@ class TestSecurityChecks(unittest.TestCase):
     def test_PE(self):
         source = 'test1.cpp'
         executable = 'test1.exe'
-        cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++')
+        cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++')
         write_testcode(source)
 
-        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--disable-nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fno-stack-protector']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--disable-nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fno-stack-protector']),
             (1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA NX RELOC_SECTION CONTROL_FLOW Canary'))
-        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
             (1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA RELOC_SECTION CONTROL_FLOW'))
-        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
             (1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA CONTROL_FLOW'))
-        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
             (1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA CONTROL_FLOW'))  # -pie -fPIE does nothing unless --dynamicbase is also supplied
-        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
             (1, executable+': failed HIGH_ENTROPY_VA CONTROL_FLOW'))
-        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
             (1, executable+': failed CONTROL_FLOW'))
-        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE', '-fcf-protection=full','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE', '-fcf-protection=full','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
             (0, ''))
 
         clean_files(source, executable)
@@ -115,30 +115,30 @@ class TestSecurityChecks(unittest.TestCase):
     def test_MACHO(self):
         source = 'test1.cpp'
         executable = 'test1'
-        cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++')
+        cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++')
         write_testcode(source)
-        arch = get_arch(cc, source, executable)
+        arch = get_arch(cxx, source, executable)
 
         if arch == lief.ARCHITECTURES.X86:
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-no_pie','-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-no_pie','-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']),
                 (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary FIXUP_CHAINS PIE CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
                 (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
                 (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
                 (1, executable+': failed CONTROL_FLOW'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-fcf-protection=full', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-fcf-protection=full', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
                 (0, ''))
         else:
             # arm64 darwin doesn't support non-PIE binaries, control flow or executable stacks
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']),
                 (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary FIXUP_CHAINS BRANCH_PROTECTION'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
                 (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
                 (1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS'))
-            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
+            self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
                 (0, ''))
 
 
diff --git a/contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py b/contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py
index aff22117d7..517626c285 100755
--- a/contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py
+++ b/contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import unittest
 
 from utils import determine_wellknown_cmd
 
-def call_symbol_check(cc: list[str], source, executable, options):
+def call_symbol_check(cxx: list[str], source, executable, options):
     # This should behave the same as AC_TRY_LINK, so arrange well-known flags
     # in the same order as autoconf would.
     #
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ def call_symbol_check(cc: list[str], source, executable, options):
     for var in ['CXXFLAGS', 'CPPFLAGS', 'LDFLAGS']:
         env_flags += filter(None, os.environ.get(var, '').split(' '))
 
-    subprocess.run([*cc,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags + options, check=True)
+    subprocess.run([*cxx,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags + options, check=True)
     p = subprocess.run([os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'symbol-check.py'), executable], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, text=True)
     os.remove(source)
     os.remove(executable)
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
     def test_ELF(self):
         source = 'test1.cpp'
         executable = 'test1'
-        cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++')
+        cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++')
 
         # -lutil is part of the libc6 package so a safe bet that it's installed
         # it's also out of context enough that it's unlikely to ever become a real dependency
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
                 }
         ''')
 
-        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lutil']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lutil']),
                 (1, executable + ': libutil.so.1 is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!\n' +
                     executable + ': failed LIBRARY_DEPENDENCIES'))
 
@@ -66,13 +66,13 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
                 }
         ''')
 
-        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, []),
+        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, []),
                 (0, ''))
 
     def test_MACHO(self):
         source = 'test1.cpp'
         executable = 'test1'
-        cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++')
+        cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++')
 
         with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f:
             f.write('''
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
 
         ''')
 
-        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lexpat', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lexpat', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']),
             (1, 'libexpat.1.dylib is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!\n' +
                 f'{executable}: failed DYNAMIC_LIBRARIES MIN_OS SDK'))
 
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
                 }
         ''')
 
-        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-framework', 'CoreGraphics', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-framework', 'CoreGraphics', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']),
                 (1, f'{executable}: failed MIN_OS SDK'))
 
         source = 'test3.cpp'
@@ -116,13 +116,13 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
                 }
         ''')
 
-        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.0', '-Wl,11.4']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.0', '-Wl,11.4']),
                 (1, f'{executable}: failed SDK'))
 
     def test_PE(self):
         source = 'test1.cpp'
         executable = 'test1.exe'
-        cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++')
+        cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++')
 
         with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f:
             f.write('''
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
                 }
         ''')
 
-        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lpdh', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lpdh', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']),
             (1, 'pdh.dll is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!\n' +
                  executable + ': failed DYNAMIC_LIBRARIES'))
 
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
                 }
         ''')
 
-        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9']),
             (1, executable + ': failed SUBSYSTEM_VERSION'))
 
         source = 'test3.cpp'
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
                 }
         ''')
 
-        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lole32', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']),
+        self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lole32', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']),
                 (0, ''))