aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/configure.ac
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorW. J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2021-12-15 21:54:10 +0100
committerW. J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com>2021-12-15 21:56:01 +0100
commitfee16b15fa3425871670239c25d4e61ae961e0c5 (patch)
tree90baff7e2f01ff38778096a1cd03278f619db5f1 /configure.ac
parent216f4ca9e7ccb1f0fcb9bab0f9940992a87ae55f (diff)
parent66a20a54a2a8446e6257b872a161089e0eed1688 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-fee16b15fa3425871670239c25d4e61ae961e0c5.tar.xz
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23744: build, qt: Drop support for i686-linux-android host
66a20a54a2a8446e6257b872a161089e0eed1688 build, qt: Drop support for `i686-linux-android` host (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: There are no reasons to keep support for `i686-linux-android` host, which is actually broken in master (50c502f54abd9eb15c8ddca013f0fdfae3d132a9), and this fact has been unnoticed for months :) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23675#issuecomment-986206434: > I'm surprised `i686-linux-android` ABI is still supported. I would love to drop it... https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23675#issuecomment-991340132 > What is `i686-linux-android`? 32-bit x86 android? is that really a thing? ACKs for top commit: prusnak: utACK 66a20a54a2a8446e6257b872a161089e0eed1688 Tree-SHA512: 211f794de2fc569f0ade2a4da805b8bfd4ce2ab0930c5d427acc4f5d015fcdc4911f02fc64f6401197f7641aed79944a9594be80c817547be3269cdd721cf79b
Diffstat (limited to 'configure.ac')
-rw-r--r--configure.ac5
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index da71ee93c5..559994818e 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -776,10 +776,7 @@ case $host in
*armv7a*)
ANDROID_ARCH=armeabi-v7a
;;
- *i686*)
- ANDROID_ARCH=i686
- ;;
- *) AC_MSG_ERROR([Could not determine Android arch]) ;;
+ *) AC_MSG_ERROR([Could not determine Android arch, or it is unsupported]) ;;
esac
;;
*linux*)