diff options
| author | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2019-07-02 17:20:58 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2019-07-02 17:21:02 -0400 |
| commit | e06067387e758e86f82b126867338faeb6220de7 (patch) | |
| tree | 19bc10f3da6d1920209e99639b93f58356abb107 /SECURITY.md | |
| parent | 4db2f8cf0f63cf2a130e238d59f5b6032420f83d (diff) | |
| parent | 01174596e69568c434198a86f54cb9ea6740e6c2 (diff) | |
Merge #16250: signrawtransactionwithkey: report error when missing redeemScript/witnessScript
01174596e69568c434198a86f54cb9ea6740e6c2 signrawtransactionwithkey: report error when missing redeemScript/witnessScript param (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Adding support for "witnessScript" as an alternative to "redeemScript" when using "signrawtransactionwithkey" meant that the `RPCTypeCheckObj()` call in `SignTransaction` can't error out just because either parameter is missing -- it's only a problem if both are missing, which isn't a state `RPCTypeCheckObj()` tests for. This results in the regression described in #16249. This patch adds some code to test for this case and give a similar error, namely:
error code: -8
error message:
Missing redeemScript/witnessScript
Fixes: #16249
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16250/commits/01174596e69568c434198a86f54cb9ea6740e6c2
promag:
ACK 01174596e. Could also write test without `dict`/`del`:
Tree-SHA512: cf51346b7dea551b7f18f2a93c2a336a293b2535c62c03a5263cd2be8c58cf0cc302891da659c167e88ad1a68a756472c3c07e99f71627c61d32886fc5a3a353
Diffstat (limited to 'SECURITY.md')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions