diff options
author | MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2022-05-06 16:49:34 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com> | 2022-05-06 16:49:01 +0200 |
commit | fa32ced49cf651b48e0a9cc165e45a27505a461f (patch) | |
tree | 33d9fe7b8e6dd1c7fa48a3c6376ab849b0bb506f /CONTRIBUTING.md | |
parent | 59ac8bacd573891d84e8ab96ff43ea12bd266f26 (diff) |
doc: Shorten explanation of "maintainers"
Diffstat (limited to 'CONTRIBUTING.md')
-rw-r--r-- | CONTRIBUTING.md | 9 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md index ba78a20ae3..aec6995d3b 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -10,10 +10,9 @@ First, in terms of structure, there is no particular concept of "Bitcoin Core developers" in the sense of privileged people. Open source often naturally revolves around a meritocracy where contributors earn trust from the developer community over time. Nevertheless, some hierarchy is necessary for practical -purposes. As such, there are repository "maintainers" who are responsible for -merging pull requests, as well as a "lead maintainer" who is responsible for the -[release cycle](/doc/release-process.md) as well as overall merging, moderation -and appointment of maintainers. +purposes. As such, there are repository maintainers who are responsible for +merging pull requests, the [release cycle](/doc/release-process.md), and +moderation. Getting Started --------------- @@ -293,7 +292,7 @@ projects such as libsecp256k1), and is not to be confused with overall Bitcoin Network Protocol consensus changes. Whether a pull request is merged into Bitcoin Core rests with the project merge -maintainers and ultimately the project lead. +maintainers. Maintainers will take into consideration if a patch is in line with the general principles of the project; meets the minimum standards for inclusion; and will |