Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23146: Test transactions conflicted by double spend in listtransactions

502f50da12694dd0193744427f0f89238e612f54 Test transactions conflicted by double spend in listtransactions (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  Test the properties of transactions conflicted by a double spend as returned by RPC listtransactions in the abandoned, confirmations, trusted and walletconflicts fields. These fields are also returned by RPCs listsinceblock and gettransactions.

ACKs for top commit:
  brunoerg:
    tACK 502f50da12694dd0193744427f0f89238e612f54
  rajarshimaitra:
    Concept + tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23146/commits/502f50da12694dd0193744427f0f89238e612f54

Tree-SHA512: 28968f4a5f1960ea45b2e6f5b20fe25c1b51f66944062dcddea52ea970ad21c74d583793d091b84e8a5e506d6aecc1f0435c5b918213975b22c38e02bba19aa1

1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py b/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py
index 6365840041..70ca5a2fe4 100755
--- a/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py
+++ b/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
         balance = newbalance
 
+        self.log.info("Test transactions conflicted by a double spend")
         # Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output
         # Mine double spend from node 1
         inputs = []
@@ -163,6 +164,34 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
         self.sync_blocks()
 
+        tx_list = self.nodes[0].listtransactions()
+
+        conflicted = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["confirmations"] < 0]
+        assert_equal(4, len(conflicted))
+
+        wallet_conflicts = [tx for tx in conflicted if tx["walletconflicts"]]
+        assert_equal(2, len(wallet_conflicts))
+
+        double_spends = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["walletconflicts"] and tx["confirmations"] > 0]
+        assert_equal(1, len(double_spends))
+        double_spend = double_spends[0]
+
+        # Test the properties of the conflicted transactions, i.e. with confirmations < 0.
+        for tx in conflicted:
+            assert_equal(tx["abandoned"], False)
+            assert_equal(tx["confirmations"], -1)
+            assert_equal(tx["trusted"], False)
+
+        # Test the properties of the double-spend transaction, i.e. having wallet conflicts and confirmations > 0.
+        assert_equal(double_spend["abandoned"], False)
+        assert_equal(double_spend["confirmations"], 1)
+        assert "trusted" not in double_spend.keys()  # "trusted" only returned if tx has 0 or negative confirmations.
+
+        # Test the walletconflicts field of each.
+        for tx in wallet_conflicts:
+            assert_equal(double_spend["walletconflicts"], [tx["txid"]])
+            assert_equal(tx["walletconflicts"], [double_spend["txid"]])
+
         # Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted
         newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
         assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20"))