diff options
author | Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me> | 2020-09-30 17:02:51 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me> | 2021-01-28 14:15:26 -0500 |
commit | 9c300cc8b3ce3d82874982fbf3087e48a6ac0ef2 (patch) | |
tree | c97b5a6ae6098a87906879fcf2d19224a1a9c1a4 | |
parent | 0e17c833cda67cdba5338bd7409061772b6d5edb (diff) |
validation: Pass in chainstate to TestBlockValidity
[META] This commit should be followed up by removing the comments and
assertions meant only to show that the change is correct.
-rw-r--r-- | src/miner.cpp | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/rpc/mining.cpp | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/validation.cpp | 12 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/validation.h | 2 |
4 files changed, 11 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/src/miner.cpp b/src/miner.cpp index 8f7bc66908..076d43c951 100644 --- a/src/miner.cpp +++ b/src/miner.cpp @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ std::unique_ptr<CBlockTemplate> BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock(const CScript& sc pblocktemplate->vTxSigOpsCost[0] = WITNESS_SCALE_FACTOR * GetLegacySigOpCount(*pblock->vtx[0]); BlockValidationState state; - if (!TestBlockValidity(state, chainparams, *pblock, pindexPrev, false, false)) { + if (!TestBlockValidity(state, chainparams, ::ChainstateActive(), *pblock, pindexPrev, false, false)) { throw std::runtime_error(strprintf("%s: TestBlockValidity failed: %s", __func__, state.ToString())); } int64_t nTime2 = GetTimeMicros(); diff --git a/src/rpc/mining.cpp b/src/rpc/mining.cpp index 4de1ce2cb4..da73d38af2 100644 --- a/src/rpc/mining.cpp +++ b/src/rpc/mining.cpp @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static RPCHelpMan generateblock() LOCK(cs_main); BlockValidationState state; - if (!TestBlockValidity(state, chainparams, block, g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(block.hashPrevBlock), false, false)) { + if (!TestBlockValidity(state, chainparams, ::ChainstateActive(), block, g_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(block.hashPrevBlock), false, false)) { throw JSONRPCError(RPC_VERIFY_ERROR, strprintf("TestBlockValidity failed: %s", state.ToString())); } } @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static RPCHelpMan getblocktemplate() if (block.hashPrevBlock != pindexPrev->GetBlockHash()) return "inconclusive-not-best-prevblk"; BlockValidationState state; - TestBlockValidity(state, Params(), block, pindexPrev, false, true); + TestBlockValidity(state, Params(), ::ChainstateActive(), block, pindexPrev, false, true); return BIP22ValidationResult(state); } diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp index 3a9ad5844e..f7aca45e66 100644 --- a/src/validation.cpp +++ b/src/validation.cpp @@ -3809,11 +3809,12 @@ bool ChainstateManager::ProcessNewBlock(const CChainParams& chainparams, const s return true; } -bool TestBlockValidity(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlock& block, CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, bool fCheckPOW, bool fCheckMerkleRoot) +bool TestBlockValidity(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CChainState& chainstate, const CBlock& block, CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, bool fCheckPOW, bool fCheckMerkleRoot) { AssertLockHeld(cs_main); - assert(pindexPrev && pindexPrev == ::ChainActive().Tip()); - CCoinsViewCache viewNew(&::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip()); + assert(std::addressof(::ChainstateActive()) == std::addressof(chainstate)); + assert(pindexPrev && pindexPrev == chainstate.m_chain.Tip()); + CCoinsViewCache viewNew(&chainstate.CoinsTip()); uint256 block_hash(block.GetHash()); CBlockIndex indexDummy(block); indexDummy.pprev = pindexPrev; @@ -3821,13 +3822,14 @@ bool TestBlockValidity(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainpar indexDummy.phashBlock = &block_hash; // NOTE: CheckBlockHeader is called by CheckBlock - if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, g_chainman.m_blockman, chainparams, pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime())) + assert(std::addressof(g_chainman.m_blockman) == std::addressof(chainstate.m_blockman)); + if (!ContextualCheckBlockHeader(block, state, chainstate.m_blockman, chainparams, pindexPrev, GetAdjustedTime())) return error("%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlockHeader: %s", __func__, state.ToString()); if (!CheckBlock(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus(), fCheckPOW, fCheckMerkleRoot)) return error("%s: Consensus::CheckBlock: %s", __func__, state.ToString()); if (!ContextualCheckBlock(block, state, chainparams.GetConsensus(), pindexPrev)) return error("%s: Consensus::ContextualCheckBlock: %s", __func__, state.ToString()); - if (!::ChainstateActive().ConnectBlock(block, state, &indexDummy, viewNew, chainparams, true)) + if (!chainstate.ConnectBlock(block, state, &indexDummy, viewNew, chainparams, true)) return false; assert(state.IsValid()); diff --git a/src/validation.h b/src/validation.h index ad5cbe019e..10a2f8f804 100644 --- a/src/validation.h +++ b/src/validation.h @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ bool UndoReadFromDisk(CBlockUndo& blockundo, const CBlockIndex* pindex); bool CheckBlock(const CBlock& block, BlockValidationState& state, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, bool fCheckPOW = true, bool fCheckMerkleRoot = true); /** Check a block is completely valid from start to finish (only works on top of our current best block) */ -bool TestBlockValidity(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, const CBlock& block, CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, bool fCheckPOW = true, bool fCheckMerkleRoot = true) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main); +bool TestBlockValidity(BlockValidationState& state, const CChainParams& chainparams, CChainState& chainstate, const CBlock& block, CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, bool fCheckPOW = true, bool fCheckMerkleRoot = true) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main); /** Check whether witness commitments are required for a block, and whether to enforce NULLDUMMY (BIP 147) rules. * Note that transaction witness validation rules are always enforced when P2SH is enforced. */ |