aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>2022-05-06 16:49:34 +0200
committerMacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>2022-05-06 16:49:01 +0200
commitfa32ced49cf651b48e0a9cc165e45a27505a461f (patch)
tree33d9fe7b8e6dd1c7fa48a3c6376ab849b0bb506f
parent59ac8bacd573891d84e8ab96ff43ea12bd266f26 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-fa32ced49cf651b48e0a9cc165e45a27505a461f.tar.xz
doc: Shorten explanation of "maintainers"
-rw-r--r--CONTRIBUTING.md9
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md
index ba78a20ae3..aec6995d3b 100644
--- a/CONTRIBUTING.md
+++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md
@@ -10,10 +10,9 @@ First, in terms of structure, there is no particular concept of "Bitcoin Core
developers" in the sense of privileged people. Open source often naturally
revolves around a meritocracy where contributors earn trust from the developer
community over time. Nevertheless, some hierarchy is necessary for practical
-purposes. As such, there are repository "maintainers" who are responsible for
-merging pull requests, as well as a "lead maintainer" who is responsible for the
-[release cycle](/doc/release-process.md) as well as overall merging, moderation
-and appointment of maintainers.
+purposes. As such, there are repository maintainers who are responsible for
+merging pull requests, the [release cycle](/doc/release-process.md), and
+moderation.
Getting Started
---------------
@@ -293,7 +292,7 @@ projects such as libsecp256k1), and is not to be confused with overall Bitcoin
Network Protocol consensus changes.
Whether a pull request is merged into Bitcoin Core rests with the project merge
-maintainers and ultimately the project lead.
+maintainers.
Maintainers will take into consideration if a patch is in line with the general
principles of the project; meets the minimum standards for inclusion; and will