aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2020-11-18 11:23:50 +0100
committerMarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>2020-11-18 11:23:56 +0100
commita64ff1c4d32c0458660426e4f40b45b8b7c13a87 (patch)
tree97d10b5c1a8ceb7527a441bcb1bac8017708afcb
parent54532f46c4e257cde682d492de72cde261998d3f (diff)
parentfa7eed5be704ccdbdce5c9aedb953dd9c8b30446 (diff)
downloadbitcoin-a64ff1c4d32c0458660426e4f40b45b8b7c13a87.tar.xz
Merge #19905: Remove dead CheckForkWarningConditionsOnNewFork
fa7eed5be704ccdbdce5c9aedb953dd9c8b30446 doc: Clarify that vpindexToConnect is in reverse order (MarcoFalke) fa62304c9760f0de9838e56150008816e7a9bacb Remove dead CheckForkWarningConditionsOnNewFork (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: The function has several code and logic bugs, which prevent it from working at all: * `vpindexToConnect.back()` is passed to `CheckForkWarningConditionsOnNewFork`, which is the earliest connected block (least work block), *not* the new fork tip * `ActivateBestChainStep` will never try to connect a block that descends from an invalid block, so the invalid fork will only ever be of height 1, never hitting the 7 block minimum condition Instead of dragging the dead and wrong code around through every change in validation, remove it. In the future it could make sense to add a fork detection somewhere outside of the `ActivateBestChainStep` logic (maybe net_processing). ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK fa7eed5be704ccdbdce5c9aedb953dd9c8b30446 fjahr: Code review ACK fa7eed5be704ccdbdce5c9aedb953dd9c8b30446 glozow: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/fa7eed5be704ccdbdce5c9aedb953dd9c8b30446 I see that it's dead code Tree-SHA512: 815bdbac7c1eb5b7594b0866a2dbd3c7619797afaadb03a5269fb96739ffb83b05b8e4f7c1e68d48d7886132dd0b12c14c3fb4ee0e72de1074726050ed203e1a
-rw-r--r--src/validation.cpp87
-rw-r--r--src/warnings.cpp18
-rw-r--r--src/warnings.h2
3 files changed, 13 insertions, 94 deletions
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index feb7502a0f..8c87c53ac7 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -1312,8 +1312,6 @@ bool CChainState::IsInitialBlockDownload() const
return false;
}
-static CBlockIndex *pindexBestForkTip = nullptr, *pindexBestForkBase = nullptr;
-
static void AlertNotify(const std::string& strMessage)
{
uiInterface.NotifyAlertChanged();
@@ -1339,73 +1337,16 @@ static void CheckForkWarningConditions() EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
// Before we get past initial download, we cannot reliably alert about forks
// (we assume we don't get stuck on a fork before finishing our initial sync)
- if (::ChainstateActive().IsInitialBlockDownload())
+ if (::ChainstateActive().IsInitialBlockDownload()) {
return;
-
- // If our best fork is no longer within 72 blocks (+/- 12 hours if no one mines it)
- // of our head, drop it
- if (pindexBestForkTip && ::ChainActive().Height() - pindexBestForkTip->nHeight >= 72)
- pindexBestForkTip = nullptr;
-
- if (pindexBestForkTip || (pindexBestInvalid && pindexBestInvalid->nChainWork > ::ChainActive().Tip()->nChainWork + (GetBlockProof(*::ChainActive().Tip()) * 6)))
- {
- if (!GetfLargeWorkForkFound() && pindexBestForkBase)
- {
- std::string warning = std::string("'Warning: Large-work fork detected, forking after block ") +
- pindexBestForkBase->phashBlock->ToString() + std::string("'");
- AlertNotify(warning);
- }
- if (pindexBestForkTip && pindexBestForkBase)
- {
- LogPrintf("%s: Warning: Large valid fork found\n forking the chain at height %d (%s)\n lasting to height %d (%s).\nChain state database corruption likely.\n", __func__,
- pindexBestForkBase->nHeight, pindexBestForkBase->phashBlock->ToString(),
- pindexBestForkTip->nHeight, pindexBestForkTip->phashBlock->ToString());
- SetfLargeWorkForkFound(true);
- }
- else
- {
- LogPrintf("%s: Warning: Found invalid chain at least ~6 blocks longer than our best chain.\nChain state database corruption likely.\n", __func__);
- SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(true);
- }
}
- else
- {
- SetfLargeWorkForkFound(false);
- SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(false);
- }
-}
-static void CheckForkWarningConditionsOnNewFork(CBlockIndex* pindexNewForkTip) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
-{
- AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
- // If we are on a fork that is sufficiently large, set a warning flag
- CBlockIndex* pfork = pindexNewForkTip;
- CBlockIndex* plonger = ::ChainActive().Tip();
- while (pfork && pfork != plonger)
- {
- while (plonger && plonger->nHeight > pfork->nHeight)
- plonger = plonger->pprev;
- if (pfork == plonger)
- break;
- pfork = pfork->pprev;
- }
-
- // We define a condition where we should warn the user about as a fork of at least 7 blocks
- // with a tip within 72 blocks (+/- 12 hours if no one mines it) of ours
- // We use 7 blocks rather arbitrarily as it represents just under 10% of sustained network
- // hash rate operating on the fork.
- // or a chain that is entirely longer than ours and invalid (note that this should be detected by both)
- // We define it this way because it allows us to only store the highest fork tip (+ base) which meets
- // the 7-block condition and from this always have the most-likely-to-cause-warning fork
- if (pfork && (!pindexBestForkTip || pindexNewForkTip->nHeight > pindexBestForkTip->nHeight) &&
- pindexNewForkTip->nChainWork - pfork->nChainWork > (GetBlockProof(*pfork) * 7) &&
- ::ChainActive().Height() - pindexNewForkTip->nHeight < 72)
- {
- pindexBestForkTip = pindexNewForkTip;
- pindexBestForkBase = pfork;
+ if (pindexBestInvalid && pindexBestInvalid->nChainWork > ::ChainActive().Tip()->nChainWork + (GetBlockProof(*::ChainActive().Tip()) * 6)) {
+ LogPrintf("%s: Warning: Found invalid chain at least ~6 blocks longer than our best chain.\nChain state database corruption likely.\n", __func__);
+ SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(true);
+ } else {
+ SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(false);
}
-
- CheckForkWarningConditions();
}
// Called both upon regular invalid block discovery *and* InvalidateBlock
@@ -2746,8 +2687,8 @@ bool CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep(BlockValidationState& state, const CChai
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
AssertLockHeld(m_mempool.cs);
- const CBlockIndex *pindexOldTip = m_chain.Tip();
- const CBlockIndex *pindexFork = m_chain.FindFork(pindexMostWork);
+ const CBlockIndex* pindexOldTip = m_chain.Tip();
+ const CBlockIndex* pindexFork = m_chain.FindFork(pindexMostWork);
// Disconnect active blocks which are no longer in the best chain.
bool fBlocksDisconnected = false;
@@ -2767,7 +2708,7 @@ bool CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep(BlockValidationState& state, const CChai
fBlocksDisconnected = true;
}
- // Build list of new blocks to connect.
+ // Build list of new blocks to connect (in descending height order).
std::vector<CBlockIndex*> vpindexToConnect;
bool fContinue = true;
int nHeight = pindexFork ? pindexFork->nHeight : -1;
@@ -2777,7 +2718,7 @@ bool CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep(BlockValidationState& state, const CChai
int nTargetHeight = std::min(nHeight + 32, pindexMostWork->nHeight);
vpindexToConnect.clear();
vpindexToConnect.reserve(nTargetHeight - nHeight);
- CBlockIndex *pindexIter = pindexMostWork->GetAncestor(nTargetHeight);
+ CBlockIndex* pindexIter = pindexMostWork->GetAncestor(nTargetHeight);
while (pindexIter && pindexIter->nHeight != nHeight) {
vpindexToConnect.push_back(pindexIter);
pindexIter = pindexIter->pprev;
@@ -2785,7 +2726,7 @@ bool CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep(BlockValidationState& state, const CChai
nHeight = nTargetHeight;
// Connect new blocks.
- for (CBlockIndex *pindexConnect : reverse_iterate(vpindexToConnect)) {
+ for (CBlockIndex* pindexConnect : reverse_iterate(vpindexToConnect)) {
if (!ConnectTip(state, chainparams, pindexConnect, pindexConnect == pindexMostWork ? pblock : std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>(), connectTrace, disconnectpool)) {
if (state.IsInvalid()) {
// The block violates a consensus rule.
@@ -2821,11 +2762,7 @@ bool CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep(BlockValidationState& state, const CChai
}
m_mempool.check(&CoinsTip());
- // Callbacks/notifications for a new best chain.
- if (fInvalidFound)
- CheckForkWarningConditionsOnNewFork(vpindexToConnect.back());
- else
- CheckForkWarningConditions();
+ CheckForkWarningConditions();
return true;
}
diff --git a/src/warnings.cpp b/src/warnings.cpp
index 501bf7e637..1dec663a73 100644
--- a/src/warnings.cpp
+++ b/src/warnings.cpp
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
static Mutex g_warnings_mutex;
static bilingual_str g_misc_warnings GUARDED_BY(g_warnings_mutex);
-static bool fLargeWorkForkFound GUARDED_BY(g_warnings_mutex) = false;
static bool fLargeWorkInvalidChainFound GUARDED_BY(g_warnings_mutex) = false;
void SetMiscWarning(const bilingual_str& warning)
@@ -23,18 +22,6 @@ void SetMiscWarning(const bilingual_str& warning)
g_misc_warnings = warning;
}
-void SetfLargeWorkForkFound(bool flag)
-{
- LOCK(g_warnings_mutex);
- fLargeWorkForkFound = flag;
-}
-
-bool GetfLargeWorkForkFound()
-{
- LOCK(g_warnings_mutex);
- return fLargeWorkForkFound;
-}
-
void SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(bool flag)
{
LOCK(g_warnings_mutex);
@@ -60,10 +47,7 @@ bilingual_str GetWarnings(bool verbose)
warnings_verbose.emplace_back(warnings_concise);
}
- if (fLargeWorkForkFound) {
- warnings_concise = _("Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues.");
- warnings_verbose.emplace_back(warnings_concise);
- } else if (fLargeWorkInvalidChainFound) {
+ if (fLargeWorkInvalidChainFound) {
warnings_concise = _("Warning: We do not appear to fully agree with our peers! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade.");
warnings_verbose.emplace_back(warnings_concise);
}
diff --git a/src/warnings.h b/src/warnings.h
index 28546eb753..e87b64a86d 100644
--- a/src/warnings.h
+++ b/src/warnings.h
@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@
struct bilingual_str;
void SetMiscWarning(const bilingual_str& warning);
-void SetfLargeWorkForkFound(bool flag);
-bool GetfLargeWorkForkFound();
void SetfLargeWorkInvalidChainFound(bool flag);
/** Format a string that describes several potential problems detected by the core.
* @param[in] verbose bool