aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAdam Jonas <jonas@chaincode.com>2020-10-20 12:10:57 -0400
committerAdam Jonas <jonas@chaincode.com>2020-11-30 13:53:50 -0500
commit86e6add5ca7d425faa314103df6617044a910ab3 (patch)
tree2abd1370c1ccbd9a500c96713ef310e0ac472bd2
parentf5bd46a4cc6d395ce71ecb99852c1774235a249c (diff)
downloadbitcoin-86e6add5ca7d425faa314103df6617044a910ab3.tar.xz
doc: rename CODEOWNERS to REVIEWERS
This reverts #18949 since CODEOWNERS require write permission. Instead the REVIEWERS file uses DrahtBot to tag reviewers in PR comments.
-rw-r--r--REVIEWERS (renamed from CODEOWNERS)23
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/CODEOWNERS b/REVIEWERS
index 24a80fb35d..fa9a8f525f 100644
--- a/CODEOWNERS
+++ b/REVIEWERS
@@ -1,20 +1,15 @@
# ==============================================================================
-# Bitcoin Core CODEOWNERS
+# Bitcoin Core REVIEWERS
# ==============================================================================
-# Configuration of code ownership and review approvals for the bitcoin/bitcoin
-# repo.
+# Configuration of automated review requests for the bitcoin/bitcoin repo
+# via DrahtBot.
-# Order is important; the last matching pattern takes the most precedence.
-# More info on how this file works can be found at:
-# https://help.github.com/articles/about-codeowners/
+# Order is not important; if a modified file or directory matches a fnmatch,
+# the reviewer will be mentioned in a PR comment requesting a review.
-# This file is called CODEOWNERS because it is a magic file for GitHub to
-# automatically suggest reviewers. In this project's case, the names below
-# should be thought of as code reviewers rather than owners. Regular
-# contributors are free to add their names to specific directories or files
-# provided that they are willing to provide a review when automatically
-# assigned.
+# Regular contributors are free to add their names to specific directories or
+# files provided that they are willing to provide a review.
# Absence from this list should not be interpreted as a discouragement to
# review a pull request. Peer review is always welcome and is a critical
@@ -23,12 +18,12 @@
# Maintainers
-# @laanwj
-# @sipa
# @fanquake
# @jonasschnelli
+# @laanwj
# @marcofalke
# @meshcollider
+# @sipa
# Docs
/doc/*[a-zA-Z-].md @harding